Comments on: Clinton, Obama Agree To Bury Racial Spat
At Nevada Debate, Democratic Rivals Blame Campaign Supporters For Controversy
Add a Comment See all 140 Comments
- September 11th, 2001, brought to you by George W. Bush and Condoleeza Rice.
- Reply to this comment
- How long was Obma addicted to crack cocaine?
How long has Bush been a drunk who can''t stay on a bike or keep from slurring his words?
How long has Clinton not been inhaling?
Is that the best you got Mr. Psyco logist. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by johnfrost at 11:28 AM : Jan 16, 2008
You are on Crack! Try a little harder with your BS smear tactics frosty. You are pitiful. - Reply to this comment
- Not so fast, they may end up sucking prunes.
- Reply to this comment
- Hitlery and Barack can suck on Ron Paul''s balls.
- Reply to this comment
- Did Obama used Crack Cocaine in School and College?
a.- Yes, Obama himself brags about it in his book and to High School students.
How long was Obama addicted to crack cocaine?
a.-Obama has been addicted to crack cocaine for at least 10 years by his own admission.
Did Sen. Obama sold crack cocaine to other students?
a.- Likely,most users either resort to stealing or selling crack cocaine to pay for
their use and addiction.
Did Sen. Obama went to a rehabilitation program for his addiction to crack cocaine?
a.- There is no record anywhere Sen.Obama went to rehab or treatment for his addiction to cocaine.
Why is Obama so skinny and spaced out at times?
a.- Possibly, Loss of weight, and ashen color skin are telltales of drug addiction.
Rumors have it. that Muslim countries are giving Obama millions to run for President,is this true?
a.- It''s only a rumor but Obama bought a 1.6 million dollar mansion with the help of his partner
Muslim Tony Rezko,a well known Chicago slumlord, whom exploits poor blacks.
Is there evidence Sen. Obama still adiicted to crack cocaine?
a.- Since Sen. Obama has not done rehab it''s highly possible He''s still addicted
to crack cocaine. It''s a question we must ask Sen Obama as soon as possible.
- Reply to this comment
- Is there something wrong with Mark Fuhrman? His church believes in:
- Commitment to God.
- Commitment to the White Community.
- Commitment to the White Family.
- Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence.
- Adherence to the White Work Ethic.
- Pledge to Make the Fruits of All Developing and Acquired Skills Available to the White Community.
- Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting White Institutions.
- Pledge Allegiance to All White Leadership Who Espouse and Embrace the White Value System.
- Personal Commitment to Embracement of the White Value System.
He is also an outstanding community members as he served in the Marines and received numerous commendations placing his life on the line as an LAPD officer. - Reply to this comment
- joshdestardi,
The only ones on their knees are pieces of horse squeeze like you; Anti-America, crybaby liberals whose only function in life is to let everyone know how much you hate George Bush.
Why don''t you follow Danny Glover and go get on your knees in from of Castro? - Reply to this comment
- And further, unless you actually WATCH Fox News, I don''t see where you have any right to slander them. You may want to dig back on past studies by MSNBC (of all places) about the ENORMOUS rate at which ''unbiased'', ''objective'' journalists give to democrats.
But that''s ok. I understand you live in a bubble and you think the LAMEstream media is giving it to you straight. Hope you enjoy living in Oz. LOL - Reply to this comment
- Dream on, Candie. I just LOVE IT when libs are confronted by evidence but still choose to get their talking points from the dailykook and Rosie O''Lardass.
Once a bedwetting liberal, always a bedwetting liberal! :) - Reply to this comment
- Fox News Channel reveals that Fox''''s evening news show is the most balanced of the four''''
So wipe the teras from your eyes and blow your sniveling nose.
Posted by Infidel_Us at 11:10 AM : Jan 16, 2008
Yes, because they define balanced by how much air time they give candidates, and most assuredly, for every story Fox does about the good deeds of Laura and George Bush, they spend an equal amount of time trying to dig up dirt about the Clintons. I''ve watched their technique -- I don''t need a fancy biased University study to tell me what I can figure out simply by wathcing. Faux News may be "balanced" in some sense, but it is far, far from fair, as any one with a brain can discern from watching their propaganda. - Reply to this comment
- They love to make racist comments. Big surprise.
Posted by Candide777 at 10:46 AM : Jan 16, 2008
As for you, you should check out the study by George Mason University. Here''s an excerpt for your edification:
''subject of more negative reporting than her closest competitor, Senator Barack Obama, says a new study by George Mason University''s Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA). The study also says that a comparison of election news reports from the three major news networks and Fox News Channel reveals that Fox''s evening news show is the most balanced of the four''
So wipe the teras from your eyes and blow your sniveling nose. - Reply to this comment
- with a name so similar to Osama Bin Laden? Posted by BaghdadsHere at 10:59 AM : Jan 16, 2008
LMAO -- are you serious? Should it be a guy who''s name rhymes with zit? Or one who sounds like he was named after a jar of jam? Don''t forget, Mike Ross is a serial killer -- do we really want a president named Mike? Wake up, people -- it could be a long four years indeed! LOL - Reply to this comment
- BaghdadsHere,
Bush was an alcoholic and crackhead too.
I think it''s a prerequisite for being president these days. - Reply to this comment
- Its not about color of skin.The question is: Is America ready for its first Black President? If yes should it be an Arabic with a name so similar to Osama Bin Laden? Should it be a confessed crack and marijuana admirer? WAKE UP AMERICA, this could be a 4 years long nightmare.
- Reply to this comment
- Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton both believe that law-abiding citizens should not be trusted to own common handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Meanwhile they are constantly surrounded by armed guards who are carrying fully automatic machine guns.
"Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control. Our Founders, having just expelled the British army, knew that the right to bear arms serves as the guardian of every other right. This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government."
-- Congressman Ron Paul, June 27, 2006 - Reply to this comment
- Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton bopth believe that law-abiding citizens should not be trusted to own common handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Meanwhile they are constantly surrpunded by armed guards who are carrying fully automatic machine guns.
"Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control. Our Founders, having just expelled the British army, knew that the right to bear arms serves as the guardian of every other right. This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government."
-- Congressman Ron Paul, June 27, 2006 - Reply to this comment
- My bad, then you are just a baiting racist - sorry for the confusion
Posted by cptdeuce at 10:50 AM : Jan 16, 2008
Still can''t answer the question though, can you? Because you know I''m right. Enjoy soaking your brain in Faux News tonight while you drool over their reporters. - Reply to this comment
- "Hitlery''s ideas of gun control are similar to Adolph Hitlers.."
Posted by Klingon69
Both Barack and Hiltery are gun-banning extremists.
"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual ... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of."
- Suzanna Gratia-Hupp
www.a-human-right.com - Reply to this comment
- Wrong, again, as usual. I''m a white male - Posted by Candide777
--------------------
My bad, then you are just a baiting racist - sorry for the confusion - Reply to this comment
