Comments on: Why Clinton Won

Women, Labor Households And Low-Income Voters Bring N.Y. Senator N.H. Victory

Add a Comment See all 198 Comments
by macusweil January 9, 2008 6:40 PM EST
Why Hillary won? two words.. VOTER FRAUD

It appears votes were shaved using the Diebold machines from Edwards, Obama and other minor candidates. Same thing happened on the Repub side too stealing votes from Huckabee and Ron Paul to the benefit of Romney and Guliani.
Reply to this comment
by guysdigdirt January 9, 2008 6:39 PM EST
YOU are the idiots that voted him in, not once but twice.
Posted by erasmus6

erassmus, you are the idiot that lives in Canada, but then again you are just and idiot.
Reply to this comment
by usayesterday January 9, 2008 6:35 PM EST
To sum up the story...

...women and the less educated voted for Hillary.

Well that says it all. (Especially the less educated part).
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 9, 2008 6:30 PM EST
"We agree what Hillary should go. She should go to Canada and be your next Queen. And take her entire family with her. Maybe she could take the Bushes, as well. . ." posted by tuckerndfw

Hillary would be more than welcome but you can keep Bush. You need to keep in mind that YOU are the idiots that voted him in, not once but twice.

Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 9, 2008 6:26 PM EST
Posted by pepperp1 at 03:13 PM : Jan 09, 2008


Could you repeat that in ENGLISH?
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 6:14 PM EST
""you don''t see Barack turning the race into blacks versus whites . . ."

That would probably be unwise considering he is BOTH."

Posted by erasmus6

Well isn''t Hillary half man half woman . . . so what''s your point?

:D
Reply to this comment
by klifton2-2009 January 9, 2008 6:14 PM EST
At the end it does not really matter who wins the White House. The new occupant like the existing one and those before him will always be beholden to the real powers that put him or her in office. There is always a piper to pay in politics, particularly money politics like in America. Each wannabe will tell you things you like to hear. When in office the occupant will, more likely than ever, do the opposite and you cannot do anything. Look at the heap of manure now in the White House and you should get the point. Unfortunately, many do not! Blindfold yourself, throw a beer can - full preferably - and you hit a politician that will do the opposite of what he or she promises to do. The political system is so corrupted by big business that your vote really do not count, because if it does count, the likes of Bush and gang would have been thrown not only out of office a long time ago, but would be in yellow jump suits from the inside looking out for the corruption, no bid contracts, and every conceivable white collar crimes you can think of.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 January 9, 2008 6:13 PM EST
you don''''''''t see Barack turning the race into blacks versus whites . . ."

That would probably be unwise considering he is BOTH.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by erasmus6 at 03:05 PM : Jan 09, 2008

dont see that I am seeing Obama vs. Women any race I guess as a strategy or are you saying the specific target is code for the broader race issue... that he is exploiting the stereo type of women fear black men thing ????
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 January 9, 2008 6:12 PM EST
A recent Letter to Ann Landers:

My husband is a liar and a cheat. He has cheated on me from the
beginning, and, when I confront him, he denies everything. What''s worse, everyone knows that he cheats on me. It is so humiliating.

Also, since he lost his job seven years ago, he hasn''t even looked
for a new one. All he does all day is smoke cigars, cruise around
and shoot the bull with his buddies, while I have to work to pay the
bills.

Since our daughter went away to college he doesn''t even pretend to
like me, and even hints that I may be a lesbian.


What should I do?

Signed: Clueless



Dear Clueless:

Grow up and dump him. Good grief woman! You don''t need him anymore!

You''re a Senator from New York running for President of the United
States. . Act like it!
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 6:12 PM EST
"What%u2019s going on whats the strategy on here?? Either way an interesting war to have created for sure%u2026"
Posted by pepperp1

Didn''t you just say in a prior comment that there was really nothing Obama could say or do to get your vote? Every candidate has a ''base'' which is largely untappable. The reality is that paradoxically Hillary doesn''t have as much substance in terms of her experience or policy laid out in comparison to Obama, so we can tell that ppl aren''t voting based on anything other than ''passion''.

Incidentally the woman who asked Hillary the question that made her cry ended up voting for Obama because in the period that followed the clip that was shown in the media Hillary segued right into her stump speech and left the woman feeling like Hillary was being fake.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 9, 2008 6:08 PM EST
"Voting for HRC is the same as voting for George Bush. She is just as corrupt and twice as phony. She would be a total disaster for the US just like her hubby would have been if the GOP Congress hadn''''t reined him in." posted by tuckerndfw

And YOU are an idiot that HATES women so anything you say, doesn''t count.


GO HILLARY!!!

Reply to this comment
by lilvinnyb January 9, 2008 6:07 PM EST
A woman shed tears and suddenly gains the "sympathy" vote. Youve got to be kidding me !!! Just goes to show that women will vote with emotion over substance ... how shallow can some voters be.

I bet our enemies are salivating for some weak democrat to win the white house so they can walk all over us.
Reply to this comment
by Razzl January 9, 2008 6:07 PM EST
Whatever happens in the Presidential primaries, those "traditional Democratic voters" owe it to the rest of us to show the same zeal for showing up at the polls on election day to oust Sununu from the Senate. Finishing the job of turning New Hampshire "blue" is an important job that only they can accomplish...
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 9, 2008 6:05 PM EST
SamTheTVCat

"...you might see lying in terms of black and white, but I think most people tend to judge in terms of degree."

My point was that they ALL lie and stretch the truth to whatever degree.

"you don''''t see Barack turning the race into blacks versus whites . . ."

That would probably be unwise considering he is BOTH.


Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 January 9, 2008 6:04 PM EST
I find it interesting this fight that Obamas campaign is brewing by attacking women as pitiful pathetic old gals good ENOUGH to boo hoo about their looks but not passionate governance, and that they will if Senator Clinton drops out will either run into Obamas arms embracing his candidacy at Oprahs behest or has he that famous Rove 51 percent math that says they are not needed to win the Presidency.

I think I may be missing something here I can feel it but not see the strategy, jump in here as I am not an angry male who fears strong women is their traction here can he pull some untapped voting block of men, was that disparaging dismissal of Senator Clinton during the debate a political stunt to marginalize humiliate a group he can win?.

What%u2019s going on whats the strategy on here?? Either way an interesting war to have created for sure%u2026
Reply to this comment
by gangesdak January 9, 2008 5:51 PM EST
Thank you for your blessings. I too hope that Hillary wins the nomination. After that just relax and watch how the Republican nominee loses. This year the question is how big is the loss.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup January 9, 2008 5:47 PM EST
I frankly hope Hillary wins the Democratic nomination.

I don''t believe she is electable.
Reply to this comment
by slpdisk January 9, 2008 4:10 PM EST
Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.
According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:
Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn%u2019t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. 81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as %u201CPremier%u201D). We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots.
But they%u2019re not. They%u2019re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004,
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us January 9, 2008 4:00 PM EST
Why Clinton won, can you say cheat?
Posted by Gunnerv1 at 12:54 PM : Jan 09, 2008

Her husband is the cheat. She''s the conniving c**t.
Reply to this comment
by hillaryin08 January 9, 2008 3:55 PM EST
Why Clinton Won?

She cried on national TV
Reply to this comment
See all 198 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: