Comments on: Clinton Challenges Obama In Dem Face-Off
Says Iowa Winner Changed His Positions On Health Care And "A Number Of Issues"
- Democrats and Republicans! If you are against the war then you have three anti-war candidates to choose from--Paul, Kucinich and Gravel. If not, support the war and vote for one of the others...it simply doesn''t matter.
- Reply to this comment
- What we need is a candidate that supports AMERICA. We have had plenty of politicians who support ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS. We need to start DEPORTING ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS and HEAVILY FINE those who support ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS. We MUST SECURE OUR BORDERS and rid OUR COUNTRY of these parasitic ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS. If our politicians refuse to do so WE, THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA, need to REPLACE the treasonous politicians with ones who SUPPORT AMERICA. Failure to act now could result in The United States of America becoming North Mexico. They have an army here already, they only need to arm them. Those who claim "they don''''t want to take over" need to look around, see the way they have ALREADY TAKEN OVER our jobs.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! GET RID OF THESE ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS, NOW! - Reply to this comment
- Polls, Polls, Polls: Obama vs. Clinton
Let''s put together all the polls released today and yesterday (carried in the last two days or so, most including Saturday).
##7NEWS/Suffolk Univ.(Sun): Obama 33% -----Clinton 35%
#Rasmussen Reports (Sun): Obama 39%---Clinton 27%.
#American Research Group (Sat):Obama 38%---Clinton 26%
#Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby (Sun): Obama 30---Clinton 31%
##MSNBC/Mason-Dixon (Sun): Obama 33%---Clinton 31%
##CNN/WMUR (Sat): Obama 33%---Clinton 33%
If we average all these polls, we should get a close to accurate picture: Obama leads Clinton by about 4%. But this math is true only from brute statistical/ mathematical perspective. If you like to believe the less known groups'' survey is truer against the establishment surveys, as was the case in Iowa, Obama could be beating Clinton by 10-12% in New Hampshire. - Reply to this comment
- Polls, Polls, Polls: Obama vs. Clinton
Let''s put together all the polls released today and yesterday (carried in the last two days or so, most including Saturday).
##7NEWS/Suffolk Univ.(Sun): Obama 33% -----Clinton 35%
#Rasmussen Reports (Sun): Obama 39%---Clinton 27%.
#American Research Group (Sat):Obama 38%---Clinton 26%
#Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby (Sun): Obama 30---Clinton 31%
##MSNBC/Mason-Dixon (Sun): Obama 33%---Clinton 31%
##CNN/WMUR (Sat): Obama 33%---Clinton 33%
If we average all these polls, we should get a close to accurate picture: Obama leads Clinton by about 4%. But this math is true only from brute statistical/ mathematical perspective. If you like to believe the less known groups'' survey is truer against the establishment surveys, as was the case in Iowa, Obama could be beating Clinton by 10-12% in New Hampshire. - Reply to this comment
- Polls, Polls, Polls: Obama vs. Clinton
Let''s put together all the polls released today and yesterday (carried in the last two days or so, most including Saturday).
##7NEWS/Suffolk Univ.(Sun): Obama 33% -----Clinton 35%
#Rasmussen Reports (Sun): Obama 39%---Clinton 27%.
#American Research Group (Sat):Obama 38%---Clinton 26%
#Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby (Sun): Obama 30---Clinton 31%
##MSNBC/Mason-Dixon (Sun): Obama 33%---Clinton 31%
##CNN/WMUR (Sat): Obama 33%---Clinton 33%
If we average all these polls, we should get a close to accurate picture: Obama leads Clinton by about 4%. But this math is true only from brute statistical/ mathematical perspective. If you like to believe the less known groups'' survey is truer against the establishment surveys, as was the case in Iowa, Obama could be beating Clinton by 10-12% in New Hampshire. - Reply to this comment
- tucker,
Were you 7 Pesos in a previous life? - Reply to this comment
- "samthetvcat writes: "Dam I thought we really had a chance to get the white house back."
................................
...........
I can''''t beleive your even trying to make the arguement that clinton is more electable. No one can be that dumb to think that."
Posted by jedi08
I didn''t write that - I was quoting forbesf. - Reply to this comment
- Your voting system is whacko. I don''t think I have ever seen anything like it.
Hillary was way ahead and now that Iowa, ONE state, is for Obama, she is way behind??? - Reply to this comment
- The nation is ready for a female president...we aren''''t ready for her!!! She can''''t handle the pressure of really being treated equally. And she plays dirtier than any politician to ever hold a place in politics...why everyone is scared to really put her feet to the fire is beyond understanding.
Posted by likeitis5050 at 11:52 AM : Jan 06, 2008
Why all the irrational hatred of a woman who is clearly ten times smarter than the current idiot-in-chief and who wants to serve her country? I don''t get it -- you can disagree with her, yes, but why hate her so much? It''s not like she has committed impeachable and treasonous offenses against our country like our current president and vice president. - Reply to this comment
- She admitted they had the chance to get Bin Laden and didn''''t, why didn''''t anyone pick up on that??!! DISGRACEFUL.
Posted by Jack3213
Good question. She''s been handled with kid gloves from the first day. She is allowed to cast all the nasty little comments she wants but I have yet to hear anyone in the media or in the moderator seat bring up anything to trip her up. Any tripping she''s done...she stepped into herself and the OTHER candidates latched onto...not the moderator. Why isn''t she questioned on how she can claim to have so much inside knowledge when she didn''t have security clearance? Why hasn''t the name Sandy Berger come back to bite her in her a.zz? It''s the same old song and dance...touch her the wrong way and she yells ''bias against women''. The nation is ready for a female president...we aren''t ready for her!!! She can''t handle the pressure of really being treated equally. And she plays dirtier than any politician to ever hold a place in politics...why everyone is scared to really put her feet to the fire is beyond understanding. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




