Comments on: Poll Shows Obama, Huckabee Lead In Iowa
Des Moines Register Puts Democratic Senator, Former GOP Arkansas Governor Ahead
Add a Comment See all 98 Comments
- Happy New Year from www.interracialloving.com ... you know it is a site where diversely ethnic singles meet new friends, make great dates, and build lasting interracial relationships.
- Reply to this comment
- I do not share your trust in polls that involve "p.c." issues.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:58 AM : Jan 01, 2008
So you reject objective polling in favor of "gut feeling", apparently.
Poll after poll indicates that your contention is absolutely false.
But you can believe what you want, tuck. You don''t HAVE to accept proof to the contrary. - Reply to this comment
- Hillary will be elected President and will be re-elected in a landslide. Why?
Because the common sense majority of this country, who are also moderates as most of the country is, will realize what a great President she had been and will reward her.
It will happen - deal with it.
Posted by forbesf at 09:57 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Why do you think Hillary made the cover of Business Week instead of Obama or Edwards? - Reply to this comment
- So go ahead, let the Neocons put the snow job on you about Hillary.
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 09:52 AM : Jan 01, 2008
I think it a might naive to blame Hillary''s fall on the neocons. To me, it appears that she''s shooting herself in the foot and doesn''t need the neocon''s help in torpedeoing her campaign.
To wit: Hillary claims that she was part of a "presidential team" for 8 years, something her own husband, who actually WAS president during that time, publicly disavows.
It wasn''t a Clinton/Clinton ticket that won, it was Clinton/Gore and everybody knows that to be the case. - Reply to this comment
- hey tucker - guess what?
Hillary will be elected President and will be re-elected in a landslide. Why?
Because the common sense majority of this country, who are also moderates as most of the country is, will realize what a great President she had been and will reward her.
It will happen - deal with it. - Reply to this comment
- That''''s not a threat to kill anyone, if fact it is nothing compared to the vile filth posted about Bush or Chemey, or even the hatefull stuff about the Clintons. Look what Kerry, Kennedy, Murtha and Durbin have said about US troops in Iraq. Goldsrarjanr doesn''''t even come close with that comment.
Posted by jowand at 09:49 AM : Jan 01, 2008
I didn''t say it was a threat, jowand.
But as you always try to do, you place words in other mouths and then take exception with what YOU say they said.
I said it was a "potential", which you can not debate.
This person''s post obviously and absolutely seethes with hatred. - Reply to this comment
- Then I guess if it is left up to you, we''ll have another Neocon in the White House.
Your insecurity and hatred of Hillary would assure that. The Neocons discredit of Hillary is working and once again, you will let them snow you.
Edwards couldn''t carry it in 2004 and hasn''t surged this time either. He''s an also ran, and a fake. Obama is still a wild card, and his motivation is not clear, nor does he have the backing to make the changes that have to be made, even if he is elected. We don''t have time for him to train for the presidency.
So go ahead, let the Neocons put the snow job on you about Hillary. - Reply to this comment
- In a head to head match up, based on agendas (without the Iraq factor) Dems are going to lose..
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:42 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Depends on who''s in the head-to-head.
See head-to-head polling results at
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo
lls/2008/president/national.html - Reply to this comment
- This country would have to be crazy and ashamed to disgrace us by electing someone named OBAMA to be President.
Posted by goldstarjanr at 09:10 AM : Jan 01, 2008 Posted by formrusmcsgt at 09:39 AM : Jan 01, 2008
That''s not a threat to kill anyone, if fact it is nothing compared to the vile filth posted about Bush or Chemey, or even the hatefull stuff about the Clintons. Look what Kerry, Kennedy, Murtha and Durbin have said about US troops in Iraq. Goldsrarjanr doesn''t even come close with that comment. - Reply to this comment
- Very few Americans support "gay rights"
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:42 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Not true.
http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm
There''''s a subtle but significant difference between a party winning a contest and their opponent losing it.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:42 AM : Jan 01, 2008
The difference is mere semantics. - Reply to this comment
- Obama is of African heritage not Arab
Posted by jowand at 09:37 AM : Jan 01, 2008
The post to which I responded was taking exception to Obama''s name, which is obviously of Arabic origin.
Barack Hussein Obama - Reply to this comment
- Who was the last neocon to try and assasinate a public official, be truthful.
Posted by jowand at 09:37 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Well jowand, here''s one potential....
----
This country would have to be crazy and ashamed to disgrace us by electing someone named OBAMA to be President.
Posted by goldstarjanr at 09:10 AM : Jan 01, 2008 - Reply to this comment
- Considering that some neocon xenophobe would probably try to assasinate Obama jsut because of his Arabic heritage, I don''''t think having Hillary one heartbeat from the presidency is very prudent.....
Posted by formrusmcsgt at 09:19 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Who was the last neocon to try and assasinate a public official, be truthful. Obama is of African heritage not Arab - Reply to this comment
- The best ticket for Dems is Obama/Richardson or Obama/Biden.
The worst ticket includes placing Hillary anywhere on the ballot.
But, Dems, as a party, are stupid, so I''''m sure they''''ll choose Hillary.
That''''s why they can''''t win elections.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:30 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Agreed on the ticket choices.
Regarding your last line there, were you conscious in November ''06? - Reply to this comment
- And I''ll tell you why, tuck.
I despise Hillary. But, on the other hand, Huck is a former dogma peddler who has no grasp whatsoever of foreign affairs.
Mitt believes in magic underwear and anyone THAT gullible doesn''t deserve to office.
Rudy is an infidel who moved his mistress into his home along with his wife and family.
And McCain is a dubya clone. ''Nuff said.
Not a single good choice in the bunch. - Reply to this comment
- Independents will decide the election and I know very few independents who would vote for Hillary over any of the Repubs you listed.
Including me.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:26 AM : Jan 01, 2008
This Independent is hoping hw won''t have to make that choice. - Reply to this comment
- hungry-
see the head-to-head poll results @
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html - Reply to this comment
- Posted by hungry1968 at 09:19 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Actually hungry, polls show that they would do well against Hillary.
Not so against Obama. - Reply to this comment
- OBAMA in 2008...Clinton for VP.
Posted by inbredwhty at 09:15 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Considering that some neocon xenophobe would probably try to assasinate Obama jsut because of his Arabic heritage, I don''t think having Hillary one heartbeat from the presidency is very prudent..... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by perception5 at 08:35 AM : Jan 01, 2008
Chances of them winning the Nov 2008 election vs the WORST democratic candidate:
Mitt - 0%, Huck - 0%, Fred - 0%, and Rudy - 0%. - Reply to this comment
