Comments on: Bush Vetoes Defense Policy Bill
Unexpected Move Centers On Provision That Could Freeze Iraqi Assets In The U.S.
- And just WHAT KIND OF SUPPORT would it be to freeze their assets? Hmm? Our troops would have to go back into areas that are under Iraqi control because they would not be able to pay the police on military. We would be stretching our forces at a time when we are seeing significant advances in Iraq.
Use your brain and think the problem through. Or do you just drink knowledge from the kool-aid that your Liberal leadership gives you?
You dumbarse, pea-brained, no-thought-of-your-own, Liberal lemming!
Posted by DemWatcher
So, the crimes of Saddam Hussein now get a free pass too? What was the point of going there, if the citizens that were oppressed under the ''evil'' regime have no recourse to compensate themselves for the pain they suffered? I guess only corporations have rights anymore. - Reply to this comment
- So Neoconscums and assorted Bushshytes, why doesn''''t the Darth Bushit regime support our troops while we''''re at war?
Tell us, we want to know!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gkc99 at 02:03 PM : Dec 28, 2007
And just WHAT KIND OF SUPPORT would it be to freeze their assets? Hmm? Our troops would have to go back into areas that are under Iraqi control because they would not be able to pay the police on military. We would be stretching our forces at a time when we are seeing significant advances in Iraq.
Use your brain and think the problem through. Or do you just drink knowledge from the kool-aid that your Liberal leadership gives you?
You dumbarse, pea-brained, no-thought-of-your-own, Liberal lemming! - Reply to this comment
- I agree, why is Bush himself bashing the troops?
- Reply to this comment
- So Neoconscums and assorted Bushshytes, why doesn''t the Darth Bushit regime support our troops while we''re at war?
Tell us, we want to know! - Reply to this comment
- So reading between the lines here Bush will veto the bill for one or more of the following reasons:
the bill is
1) good for America or Americans
2) good for the world in general
3) fair and equitable
4) a good use of public money
5) bad for the Bush anti-America cabal
That about cover Bush''s motivations? - Reply to this comment
- ""The new democratic government of Iraq, during this crucial period of reconstruction, cannot afford to have its funds entangled in such lawsuits in the United States,"
So Al-Maliki can''t make those big donations to the Darth Bushit retirement fund, no doubt!
This is how deep the Darth Bushit regime "supports our troops", by putting our soldiers in the field at risk for lack of funding because it might get in the way of payoffs to the bagmen of the Darth Bushit regime! - Reply to this comment




