Comments on: Huckabee's Views On Women Scrutinized
GOP Hopeful Signed 1998 Statement Backing Idea That Wives Should "Submit Graciously" To Husbands
Add a Comment See all 86 Comments
- If you guys are so adament at keeping church and state seperate, then why on earth do you keep trying to combine them?
Liberal Democrats...
I just don''t know what to think of them... "Organized chaos" is all I can bring to mind. - Reply to this comment
- I guess if a women absolutely should be in the White House, then Huckabee has no choice than to get a ***-change. I guess he is agreeing to that with his final statement in this article!
- Reply to this comment
- The guy isn''t going to be president, so I guess it really doesn''t matter what he thinks of women. Why is he a politician anyway. I thought ministers were called to serve and not run for public office. Jesus would be very disappointed since he had no love for politicians.
- Reply to this comment
- You may fool some of the folks out there with this but not me. You see I was born and raised in the South and I know what he and you are saying. The Religious Reich had a real problem with the Women''''s movement during the 60''''s because it played into the movement of Blacks, Both groups were VERY surpressed in the South. Any Woman who "slipped" and gave in to nature was painted a "bad girl" or was forced into a wedding. Once "Wed" she became a slave for all intents and purpose''''s. How many times I''''ve heard these "human''''s" say, "keep''''em bare foot and pregnant and you don''''t have to worry". They, like this loser, concidered Women as nothing more than Property to be used. Still do!
Posted by MCVet at 09:34 PM : Dec 13, 2007
It seems you are the one fooled, feminism was not instigated in the south by religion, but by anti christians rebelling against biblical principles and the status quo. Not surprising coming from a reich raper - Reply to this comment
- Posted by realpatriot1 at 08:43 PM : Dec 13, 2007
"Flingbat" descripes that wacko pres that had his brains in his dingdong, more interested in skirts than the country. Bush is no shining angel sure, but at least he took action after 9/11 to fight jihad,which seems to have escaped from many memories.And I,ll bet you were rooting for him just as hard as the other 85 percent back then. Surplus? give me a break,where were you back then? obviously not in tune with the 9 or so trillion we were already in debt - Reply to this comment
- I agree, we should be submissive. If we are married to a Christian man who is following Christ and living his life appropriately, we have nothing to fear; he will have our best interest at heart. Submissive doesn''t mean slave and the passage that discusses this is in the context of two way respect for each other.
- Reply to this comment
- " A wife is to submit graciously to the servant leadership of her husband ..."
Is this fellow in the 21st century? I think he must belong in the Middle East.
They not only believe that, but are allowed four wives.
And he thinks we should elect him president of a western democracy ?? - Reply to this comment
- jankebenz,
My wife could be desribed as a feminist but there''s nothing radical about her. I think the concept is more a figment of your imagination than a real phenomenon.
There''s nothing ideal about the marriage I describe, it''s the kind of marriage that I and most rational and well adjusted adults in the 21st Century have.
We both care and nurture and provide for one another and it''s totally natural. It''s not a 50-50 relationship, it''s a 100-100 relationship. - Reply to this comment
- We already have an anti-science wingnut in the White House. Huckabee will drag us down the slippery slope into theocracy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by memerider at 08:00 PM : Dec 13, 2007
+ report abuse
Maybe worse! - Reply to this comment
- The marriage you describe is an ideal scenario more prevelant before the age of radical feminism. The feminist ideology and agenda has put a rive into the family unit by pitting woman against man and/or confusing the distinctive roles each was meant for. Man,s physiological nature is and should be to lead and provide,and women,s genetical nature is to care and nurture. Thats essentially what each were made for,but now both sexes are not satisfied with nature,s design and hence we have chaos
Posted by jankebenz at 09:21 PM : Dec 13, 2007
+ report abuse
You may fool some of the folks out there with this but not me. You see I was born and raised in the South and I know what he and you are saying. The Religious Reich had a real problem with the Women''s movement during the 60''s because it played into the movement of Blacks, Both groups were VERY surpressed in the South. Any Woman who "slipped" and gave in to nature was painted a "bad girl" or was forced into a wedding. Once "Wed" she became a slave for all intents and purpose''s. How many times I''ve heard these "human''s" say, "keep''em bare foot and pregnant and you don''t have to worry". They, like this loser, concidered Women as nothing more than Property to be used. Still do! - Reply to this comment
- At least he''''s better than the previous flingbat who cared more for slippery things than the country. Huckabee''''s record is the cleanest one of the bunch,and as far as I''''m concerned, he''''s the man for the job
Posted by jankebenz at 08:27 PM : Dec 13, 2007
+ report abuse
"flingbat" Is that FASCIST Slang for the last REAL President we had.. you know the guy who gave us 8 YEARS of REAL prosperity, PEACE and handed over a SURPLUS to the pathetic LYING Scum you call a President? ROFLMAO You freaks are SO arrogant it''s rediculous. What Clinton did is MILD to what the vast majority of the CEO''s in this nation do every week... Get off your high horse Sparky.. you aren''t surpior to anyone and the WORST President in US History PROVES that point!! Sieg Heil and AMEN!! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by realpatriot1 at 08:43 PM : Dec 13, 2007
The marriage you describe is an ideal scenario more prevelant before the age of radical feminism. The feminist ideology and agenda has put a rive into the family unit by pitting woman against man and/or confusing the distinctive roles each was meant for. Man,s physiological nature is and should be to lead and provide,and women,s genetical nature is to care and nurture. Thats essentially what each were made for,but now both sexes are not satisfied with nature,s design and hence we have chaos - Reply to this comment
- He''''s a Republicant, and an evangelical fundamentalist. he thinks women like it in the dark, take it whenever the man wants, and live a hollow life without ever experiencing or -------- gasm.
- Reply to this comment
- He''s a Republicant, and an evangelical fundamentalist. he thinks women like it in the dark, take it whenever the man wants, and live a hollow life without ever experiencing ***.
- Reply to this comment
- jankebenz,
Mature adults approach life''s problems as a team working for the common good. Those who value their marriage and their mate resolve issues through collaboration. Couples who truly respect one another recognize that both must occasionally defer to the other.
That''s a marriage; what your describing is a dysfuntional relationship masquerading as a marriage.
A tyrannical cult of personality based upon the insecurities of 2 people is not leadership. - Reply to this comment
- Submit graciously to your husband. My wife won''t submit graciously to me. She wants to be an equal partner. That''s the way it should be. That doctrine is misguided and if taken out of context, can lead to middle-eastern thinking.
- Reply to this comment
- We already have an anti-science wingnut in the White House. Huckabee will drag us down the slippery slope into theocracy.
Posted by memerider at 08:00 PM : Dec 13, 2007
At least he''s better than the previous flingbat who cared more for slippery things than the country. Huckabee''s record is the cleanest one of the bunch,and as far as I''m concerned, he''s the man for the job - Reply to this comment
- Mitt Romney is the Republican Howard Dean!!! Read all about it!
After the Iowa debate yesterday Mitt Romney stopped in Marion, Iowa to give a speech at Linn-Mar High School. He said the following:
%u201CAnd I%u2019m convinced the world will remember as well because you%u2019re going to do something which people don%u2019t expect, which is give me a victory,%u201D Romney said. %u201CAnd then I%u2019m going to New Hampshire where I%u2019m pretty solidly in the lead in New Hampshire, and I%u2019m gonna be in Nevada, and I%u2019m gonna win Nevada, and I%u2019m gonna be in Wyoming, and I%u2019ll win that one and Michigan. And we%u2019re gonna do pretty *** well%u2014that%u2019s at least what I plan."
.... Yahhh Hip Ha!!!
Everybody is reading all about this now. Mitt Romney is Howard Dean all over again. The media and the Democrats will now play this over and over and over and over.
This is what brought down Howard Dean and now is bringing down Mitt Romney. Republicans don''''t need another Howard Dean.
.... Yahhh Hip Ha!!! - Reply to this comment
- And Huckabee raised his hand when asked did he believe in "creationism," or the fundamentalist Christian belief that the world is only about 6,000 years old and the supernatural being in the sky with the big gonads created it to look like there was a big bang and evolution--as if a supernatural being couldn''t make those things actually happen.
We already have an anti-science wingnut in the White House. Huckabee will drag us down the slippery slope into theocracy. - Reply to this comment
- Every segment of society all through history has its leaders ie chief,boss, manager, ect. to run things, but when more than one leader tries to run the show, problems occur.Unfortunatly, such is the case with the modern family where traditional leadership has come against rebellion by currant ideology,and now chaos is the order.
- Reply to this comment
