Comments on: Giuliani Defends Girlfriend's Expenses

Former NYC Mayor Says The Police Deemed Security Necessary For Judith Nathan

Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by radiob-2009 December 9, 2007 8:48 PM EST
Just a Gigolani and everywhere he goes-------.
Reply to this comment
by jedi08 December 9, 2007 8:44 PM EST
Imagine how much Bill used to spend on all his women?

How the drive by media quickly forgets
Reply to this comment
by oeangus December 9, 2007 8:35 PM EST
First Bush, now this guy. What, is it a prerequisite to be an condescending liar if one is running for President?
Reply to this comment
by Hybdiesel December 9, 2007 8:14 PM EST
If he gets the republican nod, he will get the democrat boot.
Reply to this comment
by drudge2 December 9, 2007 8:10 PM EST
Better keep your day job.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 9, 2007 8:09 PM EST
As Mayor, he would know how much expense would be incurred to engage security to make such trips. The taxpayers shouldn''t have to be responsible for his feckless lifestyle. Such trips require travel and hotel expenses and overtime. I guess if someone else is footing the bill for it all his urge to see his mistress is justified to himself, nevertheless. On the other hand, why couldn''t he just stay home where it''s safe if he was in so much danger.

The really sticky mickey is trying to hide the at least $444,000 worth of expenses by charging it to other agencies. His security is vested in the police department and the mayor''s office. There is absolutely no reason to be charging his security costs to other agencies. Those agencies seriously need to have their books checked for fraud and payoffs. Actually this sheds light on the need for all of his financial activities to be heavily scrutinized while he was mayor of NYC.

As far as I''m concerned, all of his business dealings, especially with foreign countries, need to be disclosed and shephardized for conflicts of interest. You cannot be an effective representative of the people of the United States and be doing business and taking money from countries and projects that effect the welfare of our citizens.

And that should apply to ALL presidential candidates.

Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 December 9, 2007 7:55 PM EST
Make that...

The answers you give could determine whether you lose to Hillary by 10 percentage points, or only by 7 and a half.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 December 9, 2007 7:54 PM EST
"Smiling broadly and laughing at some of the tougher questions, Giuliani..."

Better put your game face on, Rudy.

This isn"t a joke. It"s serious business.

The answers you could could determine whether you lose to Hillary by 10 percentage points, or only by 7 and a half.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales December 9, 2007 7:53 PM EST
Rudy''s defense? "''ho''s gotta eat don'' she?"
Reply to this comment
by stagg_lee December 9, 2007 7:52 PM EST
Rudy, you are so phony. Why don''t you be honest for a change. That big grin isn''t going to get you elected. You let the fires department, police etc... involved in 911 down. You are nothing but a phony.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 December 9, 2007 7:46 PM EST
Rudy - my advice to you would be to come clean on all of this stuff. Air it all out. The reason is simple. There is blood in the water - your blood. The sharks are the media and your opponents - both Republican and if you do get nominated the Democrats plus the Sections 537s.
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft December 9, 2007 7:43 PM EST
who cares? the guy''s not going to be elected president anyway. move on.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: