Comments on: Giuliani Defends Girlfriend's Expenses
Former NYC Mayor Says The Police Deemed Security Necessary For Judith Nathan
- Just a Gigolani and everywhere he goes-------.
- Reply to this comment
- Imagine how much Bill used to spend on all his women?
How the drive by media quickly forgets - Reply to this comment
- First Bush, now this guy. What, is it a prerequisite to be an condescending liar if one is running for President?
- Reply to this comment
- If he gets the republican nod, he will get the democrat boot.
- Reply to this comment
- Better keep your day job.
- Reply to this comment
- As Mayor, he would know how much expense would be incurred to engage security to make such trips. The taxpayers shouldn''t have to be responsible for his feckless lifestyle. Such trips require travel and hotel expenses and overtime. I guess if someone else is footing the bill for it all his urge to see his mistress is justified to himself, nevertheless. On the other hand, why couldn''t he just stay home where it''s safe if he was in so much danger.
The really sticky mickey is trying to hide the at least $444,000 worth of expenses by charging it to other agencies. His security is vested in the police department and the mayor''s office. There is absolutely no reason to be charging his security costs to other agencies. Those agencies seriously need to have their books checked for fraud and payoffs. Actually this sheds light on the need for all of his financial activities to be heavily scrutinized while he was mayor of NYC.
As far as I''m concerned, all of his business dealings, especially with foreign countries, need to be disclosed and shephardized for conflicts of interest. You cannot be an effective representative of the people of the United States and be doing business and taking money from countries and projects that effect the welfare of our citizens.
And that should apply to ALL presidential candidates. - Reply to this comment
- Make that...
The answers you give could determine whether you lose to Hillary by 10 percentage points, or only by 7 and a half. - Reply to this comment
- "Smiling broadly and laughing at some of the tougher questions, Giuliani..."
Better put your game face on, Rudy.
This isn"t a joke. It"s serious business.
The answers you could could determine whether you lose to Hillary by 10 percentage points, or only by 7 and a half. - Reply to this comment
- Rudy''s defense? "''ho''s gotta eat don'' she?"
- Reply to this comment
- Rudy, you are so phony. Why don''t you be honest for a change. That big grin isn''t going to get you elected. You let the fires department, police etc... involved in 911 down. You are nothing but a phony.
- Reply to this comment
- Rudy - my advice to you would be to come clean on all of this stuff. Air it all out. The reason is simple. There is blood in the water - your blood. The sharks are the media and your opponents - both Republican and if you do get nominated the Democrats plus the Sections 537s.
- Reply to this comment
- who cares? the guy''s not going to be elected president anyway. move on.
- Reply to this comment




