Comments on: Sparks Fly In Democratic Debate
In Nevada, Presidential Hopefuls Spar Over Health Care And Foreign Policy, Accuse Rivals Of Mudslinging
- where are posts
- Reply to this comment
- "Republican playbook," Hillary? Who does she think she''s kidding?
- Reply to this comment
- "Republican playbook," Hillary? It would seem there''s a Democratic one as well.
- Reply to this comment
- Mud out of the what playbook, Hillary? It would seem there''s a Democratic playbook as well, Hillary.
- Reply to this comment
- Mud out of the what playbook, Hillary? It would seem there''s a Democratic playbook as well, Hillary.
- Reply to this comment
- HITLERY = BILDERBERGER MEMBER & CFR MEMBER......
Both are baaaaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddddddddd!!!!!!!!!!
HITLERY IS A PHONY AND HAS MOST PEOPLE FOOLED...... - Reply to this comment
- This "debate" clearly showed that the campaign platform of double-talking Conniving Calculating Cackling Clinton is pathetic. It consists of: Show-Me-The-Money, Say-Whatever-They-Want-To-Hear, Continue-The-Neocon-Wars, Sell-The-Lincoln-Bedroom, and I-Want-A-New-Pair-Of-Hsu''s. There are no depths of depravity to which this moneywhor''e won''t go, including staging questions at public events.
America needs to do better than Conniving. She is nothing more than Bush-Lite on the neocon wars and many other critical issues. As an advocate for the most un-American piece of legislation ever enacted, the so-called "Patriot" Act, Conniving shows clearly that she will be as lawless, secretive and anti Bill of Rights as DickNBush.
The women that vote for Conniving will, eventually, deeply regret it - after four more years of their children being killed and maimed in the wars that Conniving will continue. In fact, any Dem that supports Conniving will eventually suffer deep "buyer''s remorse", once reality sets in.
Wake up Dems - take the party back from the Loser Faction and nominate somebody who is NOT hated by 50% of the voters, who is NOT a puppet of lobbyists, one that has ethics, honesty, and a commitment to ending the endless NEOCON wars. There are many good choices, but Conniving isn''t one of them. - Reply to this comment
- Anyone claiming that this was a strong showing for Hillary should recheck their medication dosages. There should be a huge asterisk next to that claim. The crowd was so obviously biased and coached it was ridiculous. It reminded me of Hitler''s sickening propoganda machine that helped skew the opinion of the German people with calamatous results. Wolf Blitzer made no effort to "sling the mud" at Hillary like he did at Obama and Edwards. For example, when he first asked Obama about the driver''s license issue, his answer was "When I was a state senator in Illinois, I voted to require that illegal aliens get trained, get a license, get insurance to protect public safety. That was my intention." Too clear? Lets ask again, and again and again until it seems like an unclear answer. By the way, he finished with a distinct "yes", and it didnt take two weeks. Hillary was given a free pass by her lap-dog Blitzer by being allowed to simply say "no" even though she would have desrved a follow up for clarification since she so painfully waffled on that answer in Philadelphia.
- Reply to this comment
- Also, since everyone has tried to raise a big stink in the past about Obama''s patriotism with trivial issues like a flag pin or the ridiculous and unwarranted national anthem scandal, I hope the media will prove just as ambitious in reporting the utter disrespect Hillary showed to one of our fine patriots that has nobley chosen personal sacrifice and service to our country by risking his life on three tours of duty in Iraq. Shouldn''t the first words that come out of the mouth of Presidential candidate be, "First and foremost, I want to thank you for your service?" Instead she was in such a hurry to spew her prepared "textbook" answer that she overlooked that basic, deserved respect. She should be ashamed. OK MSM, show me what your made of...sick ''em.
PS - Obama acknowledged both his and his mother''s sacrifices before he answered the question. That''s class.
This is Obama''s moment in time!
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/447956/obamas_moment_in_time.html - Reply to this comment
- Anyone claiming that this was a strong showing for Hillary should recheck their medication dosages. There should be a huge asterisk next to that claim. The crowd was so obviously biased and coached it was ridiculous. It reminded me of Hitler''s sickening propoganda machine that helped skew the opinion of the German people with calamatous results. Wolf Blitzer made no effort to "sling the mud" at Hillary like he did at Obama and Edwards. For example, when he first asked Obama about the driver''s license issue, his answer was "When I was a state senator in Illinois, I voted to require that illegal aliens get trained, get a license, get insurance to protect public safety. That was my intention." Too clear? Lets ask again, and again and again until it seems like an unclear answer. By the way, he finished with a distinct "yes", and it didnt take two weeks. Hillary was given a free pass by her lap-dog Blitzer by being allowed to simply say "no" even though she would have desrved a follow up for clarification since she so painfully waffled on that answer in Philadelphia.
- Reply to this comment
Ex-NBA ref Tim Donaghy 




