Comments on: Congress Overrides Bush Veto On Water Bill

First Veto Override During Bush Presidency Comes On $23B Water Resources Bill

Add a Comment See all 220 Comments
by abbe91 November 9, 2007 7:36 AM EST
"Time to stop all the less important BS, and focus on the main, most serious problem for America, the impeachment, arrest, and trials of the members of what I call the Bush klan.
Posted by brianbwb at 11:42 PM : Nov 08, 2007"

Actually, there is something going on, but hardly reported in the MSM ...
Reply to this comment
by mrconservatv November 9, 2007 2:50 AM EST
Time to stop all the less important BS, and focus on the main, most serious problem for America, the impeachment, arrest, and trials of the members of what I call the Bush klan. Stop this 10 billion per month robbery of our treasury, bring our troops home, hold the Bush klan personally accountable for the losses, and then we can focus on the important infrastructure modernization vital to this country''''s future.


Posted by brianbwb at 11:42 PM : Nov 08, 2007

The Senate has confirmed Michael Mukasey as the nation''s 81st attorney general.

Theirs no stopping the madness; but I share your view.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 November 9, 2007 2:42 AM EST
Time to stop all the less important BS, and focus on the main, most serious problem for America, the impeachment, arrest, and trials of the members of what I call the Bush klan. Stop this 10 billion per month robbery of our treasury, bring our troops home, hold the Bush klan personally accountable for the losses, and then we can focus on the important infrastructure modernization vital to this country''s future.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 1:41 AM EST
I''''m confused.

Posted by bennyblack1 at 10:32 PM : Nov 08, 2007

It shows.
Reply to this comment
by neobrian-2009 November 9, 2007 1:33 AM EST
WORST EVER !!! W is blatantly corrupt,...W is a" Pawn of Big Business",..W is Evil ! W is The WORST President in USA history,...
Reply to this comment
by bennyblack1 November 9, 2007 1:32 AM EST
Since when has Michale Gorbachev been right? We are slowly drifting from a free state to the philosophies of Gorby, who was allowed to speak freely on the principals of Stalin in the United States. I''m confused. America was founded on being FREE from the clutches of government. Now we are moving toward being enslaved to it again.
Reply to this comment
by bennyblack1 November 9, 2007 1:28 AM EST
Hey! Dana Perino!
President Bush has NOT been standing up for the taxpayers. He and Cheney have both been saying that they will do what is right. But that only means what they believe is right according to their own value systems. That is, THEIR OWN value systems apart from the rest of the country. There is nothing right about prolonging Iraq. There is nothing right about backing a country that supports Al Queda and that knows where Bin Laden is (if he isn''t dead). There is nothing right about funding pork programs that line the pockets of the rich and leave the poor and middle class digging for money to pay their bills. There is nothing right about ignoring the economic and (silent) war torn state of the United States. There is NOTHING RIGHT about hiding from the people because you don''t want to hear "them .a.s.s.e.s." opinions. There is NOTHING RIGHT about trading the United States in for an elite driven, corporate run, communist state.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 1:26 AM EST
From what I see, the only thing that Hillary has going for her is that she''s married to one of the best politicians this country has ever produced.

Now, before I get jumped, I did not say one of the best presidents this country has produced, but rather, one of it''s best politicians.

As an individual, I think he''s a scumbag. But he is a consumate politician in my view.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 1:21 AM EST
Forum, you sound like you want the war to continue so that it will be good for the Democrats.

I know you do not mean that.
Posted by donbl1 at 09:57 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Want it to continue? I never wanted this stupidity to start.

The insurgents have not been captured. They haven''t gone anywhere. WWhat do you think? That after 5 years of stalemating the strongest army on the planet that they''ve just given up?

They''re not blowning $10 billion a month on this boondoggle. It costs them nothing to wait out the surge.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 November 9, 2007 1:03 AM EST
Forum, we are both correct. Hillary has been getting briefings from the WH and she has said she appreciates them. The other candidates as well. However, she has seen the multiple outcomes in 2008 of the current Iraq effort and is carefully picking a path that will let her claim prescience either way.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 12:58 AM EST
Hillary understands this and that is why she has the positions she has......

Posted by donbl1 at 09:51 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Hillary has the positions she has because she knows that women alone will not elect her.

She also wants to hold on to her sizeable Jewish base and plays both sides of the table when convenient. A little for this side, a little for that side, not too much now, not enough to really get pinned down on a commitment, etc., etc., etc.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 November 9, 2007 12:57 AM EST
Forum, you sound like you want the war to continue so that it will be good for the Democrats.

I know you do not mean that.

Let us hope it is off the 2008 political table. It would be good for the country and allow us to talk about domestic issues which have taken a back seat for the last several years.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 12:55 AM EST
Forum, actually, because the GOP wants the issue off the table for the 2008 elections, I suspect we will be down below 90,000 troops (Gates'''' number) and we will be withdrawn to relative safety.

Hillary understands this and that is why she has the positions she has......


Posted by donbl1 at 09:51 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Hoiw many times have you seen these rosy projections from Repubs? Too many times to believe any of them, I''ll tell you that.

Rumsfeld said we''d be below 100,000 troops by the end of 2003.

Gates can say 90,000 now, but when the violence returns to pre-surge levels as the troop strength returns to pre-surge levels, he''ll be singing a different tune, you can bet.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 12:51 AM EST
Forum, you are correct today. However, if the Iraq War does wind down and the troops are coming home in large numbers, then he will become very popular in Republican circles.

Posted by donbl1 at 09:47 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Remember all the talk a few years ago about Jeb possibly succeeding Dubya?

Boy howdy, did Dubya make sure that no other Bush will ever sit in the oval office....
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 November 9, 2007 12:51 AM EST
Forum, actually, because the GOP wants the issue off the table for the 2008 elections, I suspect we will be down below 90,000 troops (Gates'' number) and we will be withdrawn to relative safety.

Hillary understands this and that is why she has the positions she has......
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 12:48 AM EST
Forum, you are correct today. However, if the Iraq War does wind down and the troops are coming home in large numbers, then he will become very popular in Republican circles.

Posted by donbl1 at 09:47 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Watch what happens in spring when the unsustainable surge ends.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 November 9, 2007 12:47 AM EST
Forum, you are correct today. However, if the Iraq War does wind down and the troops are coming home in large numbers, then he will become very popular in Republican circles.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt November 9, 2007 12:46 AM EST
Oh also I love Bush''''s clueless look in the photo in this artical.

Posted by fedupwithit1 at 08:17 PM : Nov 08, 2007

Does he have any other kind of look? I''ve never seen it and I was in Texas during his tenure as governor.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 November 9, 2007 12:45 AM EST
Sunset, he did not take Econ at Yale. He took it at Harvard and passed as part of his MBA.
Reply to this comment
by usayesterday November 9, 2007 12:44 AM EST
GEORGE BUSH FAILED ECONOMICS.. when he was at YALE...



Posted by sunsetbillyb at 06:53 PM : Nov 08, 2007

He''''s now getting a crash course

Posted by mrconservatv at 06:57 PM : Nov 08, 2007
................


With an emphasis on "crash".
Reply to this comment
See all 220 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: