Comments on: Rivals Target Clinton At Debate

Edwards, Obama Assail Democratic Frontrunner Over Iran, Iraq, And Consistency Of Positions

[gkc99]

"the ravings of that Indian animal who called the 9-11 victims a bunch of Nazis..."--Posted by Prinzowhales


I''m surprised at you, Prinzo! Ward Churchill is not Indian, in the first place. Second, the guy made the point that a fair number of the tenants of the Twin Towers were the corporate masters who oppress us all.

For a guy who thinks the Zionist conspiracy is behind all our troubles, don''t you think those nasty Zionists were among the Twin Towers tenants? And don''t you frequently call them Nazis?

Gotta get your story straight.

I''d say the corporate masters are not Zionists or Jewish at all, more like Episcopalians. But a fair number were Twin Towers tenants, so maybe Churchill makes a point!

[johnny343sc]

Y''know-

In 2008, if the Democrats were SMART (which they aren''t normally) they would run Biden or Edwards since they have to capture Republican votes away from the Republican candidate to win. These candidates -seem- to be more centrist to your average conservative voter, even though they are spoiled, scumbag liberals like the rest.

Obama Bin Laden and "Queen Hitler-y the Unholy" are too wacky and scary to garner Republican votes.

If Hell-ery weren''t trying to please everyone to fulfill her own HUGE ambitions and self-glorfication and Obama bin Laden was named "Joe Smith" or any other normal American-sounding name and was a conservative African-American Republican, then they
-might- have a chance with Joe Average American.

Think about that...

Heck, I hope they run so the Republican swill turn-out en force against them and another Commie-crat presidential election loss will ensue yet again!

;)

[mocalleo]

As a professor of Woman''s Studies, I am greatly insulted by the reaction my last reasoned post generated. Let me be clear, an attack on CONDALEEZA RICE is an attack on ALL WOMEN !

Posted by TrueProgress at 11:04 AM : Oct 31, 2007


.

Do you still believe your own words, TrueProgress ???

.

[pepperp1]

Posted by Emma915 at 10:59 AM : Oct 31, 2007

You are so right that goof Chris Matthews really though he had the Hillary swifty bot bite maybe Fox noise has an opening for him. Lordy, NY would not have the problem they do if Rudy had not invited millions of illegal to town without id and placed the State at risk from unknown unidentified potential terrorist.

[jon_mccain]

gunownerdan, oh great, another Ron Paul nut in our midsts! Get it though your head this guy is a loser anti goverment nut job!
Posted by nolalou

Nolalou, whether you support Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich is irrelevant, these fringe candidates (that can freely speak their minds) with our support, have the potential to pull the mainstream candidates off of their sound bites and into a real discussion of the issues that America yearns for.

[mcvett]

I find it frightenly ironic that the very same people who promote themselves
as tolerant and open-minded,
are the very same people who want to CLOSE their minds to Rush Limbaugh.

Remember, we need to keep our minds open to alternative ideas and celebrate diversity.
including Rush Limbaugh.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

"Free Speech" is to protect speech that is politically INcorrect.

Thereby exposing the concept of "political correctness" for the danger it is.

.

PERSONAL NOTE:

It wasn''''t conservatives who created "Sensitiviity Training Classes"
(A.K.A.-re-education camps) during the 1990''''s, that was liberals.

"Sensitivity Training Classes" / Re-education Camps
...Tomato/Tomahto.

Either way, it was a place that liberals sent you so you can be taught to speak/think the way liberals wanted you to speak/think.

"Political Correctness" IS THE BIGGEST DANGER "free speech" HAS EVER FACED.


ROTFLMAO...Seig Heil, Hillary

.

[prinzowhales]

nolalou--The important thing is that Ron Paul does not endorse David Duke and Stormfront.

If you find the Constitution so objectionable, then by all means...vote for its enemies.

What is "anti-sane" about controlling our borders and enforcing our immigration laws?

That he is pro-Life is not "anti-sane"...In fact, he maintains, quite rightly, that the central government has no Constitutional power to deal with the abortion issue.

He doesn''t care what two consenting adults do--which is one reason that he is against the war on drugs... which helps the connected-drug dealers maintain their market position. That''s not "anti-gay" and his position on the drug war is not "Pro-drug"...it is "Pro-freedom".

Cross burning, regardless of how abhorrent it is, is an act of free speech...just as putting a Crucifix in a bottle of urine is an act of free speech...or wearing a tee-shirt expressing support for the ''Plan of San Diego'' which calls for the murder of every American in the Southwest...or the ravings of that Indian animal who called the 9-11 victims a bunch of Nazis...all of these things are abhorrent...but, we certainly don''t want a switch-hitting, dry-drunk, coke-headed mass murdering psychopath like George W. Bush and his chums deciding what can be said and what can''t be said. It is good that people are not forced to hide their views by law...it allows us to see them for what they are, unreserved and unedited.

[mocalleo]

As a professor of Woman''''s Studies, I am greatly insulted by the reaction my last reasoned post generated. Let me be clear, an attack on CONDALEEZA RICE is an attack on ALL WOMEN !

Posted by TrueProgress at 11:04 AM : Oct 31, 2007


.

Do you still believe your own words, TrueProgress ???

.

[setumstrt9]

Emma915,

You sound a little nervous. I think Hillary fell apart last night. I hope she gets the dem nomination, I think any of the republican candidates can beat her.

[emma915]

Way to go Dennis! I''m proud of you!

[emma915]

In addition to the misinterpretation of what Hillary said, the debates are disappointing in relation to the fact that Edwards, Obama and Dodd have turned the whole thing into a "bash Hillary" contest. The idea of attacking each other reflects badly on the image of the party. They should say that they would do things differently, but present a consolidated Democratic front. What happened to the idea of running a clean campaign?

[trueprogress]

As a professor of Woman''s Studies, I am greatly insulted by the reaction my last reasoned post generated. Let me be clear, an attack on Ms. Clinton is an attack on ALL WOMEN ! Do you think it is finally time for us to have a chance to run the country ? We have been passengers long enough.
I tell my students to record ALL conversations with MALE professors, as some of you may know, so that we can justifiably "protect ourselves" from gender generated criticism and provocative language while the male poses for an exchange for "better grades" ( I need not go into details !). This is no different, only now it has become more open, as the oppression does not appear to be working, the verbal daggers come out. Disgusting.
AS for all of you, I do have a very responsible job, teach over 5 hours a week and have produced several conferences and meetings for young college aged women who have open their minds and hearts to reality. My State funded projects promote wisdom, maturity, and femal independence. My students of course can vote for and work for any candidate they choose, I just help guide them with knowledge and perspectives that other professors choose to deny.
This rant on Ms. H, is a disgusting revelation of how difficult it is in the Western Societies ( not Middle East or African ) to be a Upper tiered/societal-unregulated women.

[mudrose-2009]

Gee, I missed the debate. I''ll bet it was stimulating. Almost like watching a holidy yule log. Hahahahha!

[Frisky1989]

The only reason Obama is coming up with all this now is because his ratings are dropping

[emma915]

GOD! I hate the media!!! Commentators and reporters twist things around so they can tell us what candidates said as though we aren''t able to hear it on our own. Go back and read it or listen to it again, in full, without any editing. . . . . Don''t let others tell you what was said. Listen!
HILLARY WAS NOT DOUBLE TALKING ON THE DRIVERS'' LICENSE TO IMMIGRANTS ISSUE! What she said was; she would NOT support what Spitzer was doing, NOR would she do it that way herself. BUT, the fact that he was trying to come up with a way to keep track of illegal immigrants, and at the same time make sure those driving on our highways had passed a test to prove they can drive, "makes sense."

[pepperp1]

Wow Hillary took a beating but still won the debate, the rest of the crew not impressive trying to act like Republican attack dogs with bot bite black and white gotchas. Wrong party fellows we non republicans are not afraid or frightened peoples and can add more than two subjects one emotional together and still find wisdom, assualting reason, wrong party.
By the way Sptizer idea is a good one, everyone should have identification that is official in some manner, NY has a huge number of illegals because Rudy invited them in no questions asked, what if there is another Mohammad Atta hiding in that protected unidentified group, immigration reform is required for the country and Congress has failed the States and Bush has stripped the number of prosecutions and immigration judges of any power to enforce our laws just another failed governance mess to clean up say on thing do another and we Americans suffer.

Good training for Hillary,
Edwards blew it, looked southern and petulant remindful of Bush also rocks from a glass house it is he I do not trust never have, Kucinich oh well UFO%u2019s great, these two are the reason Democrats shoot themselves in the foot.

Russert and Matthews sure looked like frightened white males, foaming mouth Hillary haters make no mistake, they can%u2019t even keep their facial expression neutral.

[nolalou]

gunownerdan, oh great, another Ron Paul nut in our midsts! Get it though your head this guy is a loser anti goverment nut job! He''s enthusiastically endorsed by David Duke, former KKK leader, and StormFront, a white separatist group for gods sake! Sure he sounds good on some issues, like the war in Iraq, but this guy is as dangerous as some of his supporters. Ron Paul is anti-choice, anti-gay, anti-environment, anti-sane immigration policy, and apparently, anti-separation of church and state as well. When he ran for congress in 1996, he endorsed the concept of secession, defended cross burning as an act of free speech and expressed sympathy for a man sentenced to prison for bombing an IRS building."

Not that I''m worried about Ron Paul, he won''t win a single primary, let alone the nomination. In most states, only registered Republican''s can vote in the Republican primary, and I don''t see them voting for Paul.

[mcvett]

I find it frightenly ironic that the very same people who promote themselves
as tolerant and open-minded,
are the very same people who want to CLOSE their minds to Rush Limbaugh.

Remember, we need to keep our minds open to alternative ideas and celebrate diversity.
including Rush Limbaugh.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

"Free Speech" is to protect speech that is politically INcorrect.

Thereby exposing the concept of "political correctness" for the danger it is.

.

PERSONAL NOTE:

It wasn''t conservatives who created "Sensitiviity Training Classes"
(A.K.A.-re-education camps) during the 1990''s, that was liberals.

"Sensitivity Training Classes" / Re-education Camps
...Tomato/Tomahto.

Either way, it was a place that liberals sent you so you can be taught to speak/think the way liberals wanted you to speak/think.

"Political Correctness" IS THE BIGGEST DANGER "free speech" HAS EVER FACED.


ROTFLMAO...Seig Heil, Hillary

.

[zootallures2]

Anyone who votes for Hillary or Guliani is a total gawd aweful moron just like them.

[mocalleo]

I still wonder how Hillary is going to politically destroy Barack Obama,
While simultaneously proclaiming to "feel the pain" of black people

LOL