Comments on: Jimmy Carter Slams Bush On Human Rights
Says U.S. Has Tortured Prisoners, Ignoring Geneva Convention
Add a Comment See all 196 Comments
- irishbitch11- Couldn''t agree with you more. It is amazing how many of these Bush supporters have no opinion of their own. What ever Bush says, not one thing do they disagree with him on. True, a few of them are payed to be here, and some just enjoy getting people rowled, but the majority of them have no intelligence what so ever. They are traders to the country and what it stands for, these are the real terrorists.
- Reply to this comment
- If it wasn''''t for Carter betraying the Shah, and standing up firm behind him, we might even have avoided 9/11.
Posted by Draftreid at 12:47 PM : Oct 11, 2007
Now Iran was part of 9-11 ! How many Iranians were involved in 9-11 ??
Iranian State Radio, 5 Nov. 1978
Shah of Iran
Promise to the nation: You, the people of Iran, rose against injustice and corruption%u2026 I too, have heard the voice of your revolution. As the Shah of Iran, and as an Iranian, I will support the revolution of my people. I promise that the previous mistakes, unlawful acts and injustice will not be repeated.
If Bush could only walk in the Shah''s foot prints ! - Reply to this comment
- The best thing that could happen to Jimmy Carter?
Outside of dropping dead...
Send him to Gitmo or Al Gharib and have him share a cell with his friends. At second thought, maybe send Pelosi, Reid, the two Clintons, Boy Obama and KKK Byrd down there too. All of them deserve the Qaedists they will be sleeping with - in Hillary''s case it might be the second time she''s slept with a man.
LOL. - Reply to this comment
- Pepperpot,
Who are the judges who are disdainful of the rights of American citizens and workers - and who legislate more often than not from the bench?
Hint - they''re NOT G.W. Bush or Reagan appointees - nor are they your dreaded Neo-Cons.
The next time an American kid is gunned down in Hazleton or savagely murdered like the four in New Jersey, I hope you have the guts, if not the brains to place the blame where it lies.
It won''t be the Neo-Cons but rather those who also give the David Dukes of the USA a pass too. - Reply to this comment
- That last message was also for Pepper - who needs a spray. LOL.
Another typical Neo-Fascist, MoveOn.Org goosestepping dummy who blames Neo-Cons aka the Jews for the anti-Semitism, the pro-Islamofascist appeasement, and the pro-ILLEGAL policies of its fellow Left wacknuts. - Reply to this comment
- Boy, IOWEIGN,
the funny farm must be allowing its inmates to use a computer these days.
If anything David Duke''s policies neatly dovetail with MoveOn.Orgs - and yours too.
The Republicans kicked him out, and rightly so. The Democrats kept Jew-baiters and America haters like KKK Byrd and Carter.
Care to respond? - I''m sure it will be a typical spew about Neo-Cons. You don''t have the backbone or brains to shine a Neo-Conservative''s shoes. Just like weee Jimmeee.
Neo-Conservatives elected Ronald Reagan - a man with true courage and integrity - MoveOn.Org ideological allies of Duke and KKK Byrd elected guys like Carter and Clinton. Who are the real ANTI-Americans? The ones who stand up for citizens over ILLEGALS, and advocate a strong military and a willingness to confront Islamonazis - or those who don''t? Meknows its the latter.
Better develop some intelligence soon, lil boy. - Reply to this comment
- Boy, IOWEIGN,
the funny farm must be allowing its inmates to use a computer these days.
If anything David Duke''s policies neatly dovetail with MoveOn.Orgs - and yours too.
The Republicans kicked him out, and rightly so. The Democrats kept Jew-baiters and America haters like KKK Byrd and Carter.
Care to respond? - I''m sure it will be a typical spew about Neo-Cons. You don''t have the backbone or brains to shine a Neo-Conservative''s shoes. Just like weee Jimmeee. - Reply to this comment
- If it wasn''t for Carter betraying the Shah, and standing up firm behind him, we might even have avoided 9/11.
As it is, we now have to face the spectre of a hostile Iranian regime with the possibility of nuclear weapons it is all too willing to drop on Tel-Aviv or New York City if they''re built.
Thanks to the legacy of Coward, Bigot, Liar, Klan Acolyte and Anti-Semitic James Earl Peanut Boy Carter. - Reply to this comment
- Don''''t forget to cut a check to David Duke. I''''m sure you''''ve sent them off to the Carter Center, KKK Byrd, and MoveOn.Org already. Draftreid
Duh David Duke is on your side, lol..............must not have been in the RNC BOT BITE talking points, well that is silly like they tell the thruth ever...Add back of the Jews will ya
neoconservatism is a fringe anti american intrest political philosophy, aka Bush Doctrine, you can be of any faith, or none%u2026..duh - Reply to this comment
- I checked it out, moron, and by the way, the Shah was much more benevolent to opponents. One of the reasons why he didn''t keep his throne.
If he had ignored Carter and was the devil you Left Nazis make him out to be, the streets of Iranian cities would have been filled with the blood of his enemies, including Khomeini and Ahmedinejedad.
Unfortunately he was a bit more kind hearted and benevolent, not a brutal thug like YOUR friends like Ahmedinejedad.
If it wasn''t for Carter betraying the Shah, we MORE THAN LIKELY would never have had Hizbullah, Hamas and Al Qaeda. Maybe they should go and live with you.
Again, Carter supported an even more repressive, anti-American regency, the House of Saud - he hated the Shah because he was an ALLY - get that in your thick, brain dead skull. - Reply to this comment
- Oh, and are you in jail right now, IOWEIGN? When you are, and for violations of the Patriot Act, please write me.
Don''''t forget - it will be a Constitutionalist judge, more likely a Republican who will protect your rights to spew - not a horsefaced Left Fascist who legislates from the bench.
Posted by Draftreid at 12:38 PM : Oct 11, 2007
Ask Mayfield that question, if you think it can''t happen ? - Reply to this comment
- Carter''''s human rights -
Allowing the Ayatollahs to torture, maim, kill and repress a once vibrant Iranian society.
Supporting the kidnappers of American children in Saudi Arabia.
Paying NO heed to the abuses of Castro, of Arafat, of the then-Mengistu regime in Ethiopia, or his old Sandinista friends. Thank goodness a Republican President has made sure Danny Ortega and his thugs don''''t go back to their old ways.
And this b*stard and bigot cries about his Hamas friends of Al Qaeda being interrogated. Tell you what - he and Rosalynn need a interrogation. A permanent one.
Posted by Draftreid at 12:36 PM : Oct 11, 2007
You better checkout the Shah of Iran''s behaviour too. - Reply to this comment
- Oh, and are you in jail right now, IOWEIGN? When you are, and for violations of the Patriot Act, please write me.
Don''t forget - it will be a Constitutionalist judge, more likely a Republican who will protect your rights to spew - not a horsefaced Left Fascist who legislates from the bench. - Reply to this comment
- Carter''s human rights -
Allowing the Ayatollahs to torture, maim, kill and repress a once vibrant Iranian society.
Supporting the kidnappers of American children in Saudi Arabia.
Paying NO heed to the abuses of Castro, of Arafat, of the then-Mengistu regime in Ethiopia, or his old Sandinista friends. Thank goodness a Republican President has made sure Danny Ortega and his thugs don''t go back to their old ways.
And this b*stard and bigot cries about his Hamas friends of Al Qaeda being interrogated. Tell you what - he and Rosalynn need a interrogation. A permanent one. - Reply to this comment
- I work in the information field, and there''''s no way I would give out someone''''s private files to an FBI or police agent unless it is by court order or in the interests of our security. You Left wackonuts would gladly do it.
Posted by Draftreid at 12:27 PM : Oct 11, 2007
Just because you haven''t been asked doesn''t mean it isn''t happening.
PS... The moon isn''t made out of cheese either ! - Reply to this comment
- Who appointed this Ann Aiken?
9TH Circuit Court appointment - and I''d bet a dollar a doughnut it was a Carter or Clinton choice.
The kind of judge who''d open our doors to the Attas as well as the other illegals sneaking across our borders. And again, this DOESN''T prove a thing. I have worked in the information field for 20 years, over six since the Patriot Act, and only once has a policeman asked for records - in this case concerning a s(exual harassment issue. And he had to wait for a court order plus the approval of my supervisors before he got anything from me.
But guys like you IOWEIGN, in your Stalinist and Hitlerite mindsets would have given him the keys to the kingdom. Just ask the unfortunates in the countries that you respect. - Reply to this comment
- nolalou,
One question - are your liberties being taken away or threatened? And if so, are they being taken away by Conservative, Law Abiding Judges who stick to our Constitution, or by your Left-Fascist (and by the way, when you call me a Nazi, you''d had better look at yourself in the mirror)Carter and Clinton appointees who legislate from the bench.
Methinks, no, Meknows it is the latter. Again, I''ve proved it with the cases of Carter and Clinton judges supporting ILLEGAL aliens who have committed crimes - you''ve proven nothing.
I work in the information field, and there''s no way I would give out someone''s private files to an FBI or police agent unless it is by court order or in the interests of our security. You Left wackonuts would gladly do it. - Reply to this comment
- Prove it - if anything the rights of American workers and citizens are being violated by Carter and Clinton appointed JUDGES who seem to think an ILLEGAL thug''''s life and well-being are more important than those of Americans.
Posted by Draftreid at 11:56 AM : Oct 11, 2007
The Patriot Act is Unconstitutional
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/11/terror/main3356551.shtml
Federal Judge Struck Down Secret Searches And Surveillance As Unconstitutional
The Bush administration is appealing a ruling by a federal judge in Oregon who struck down key portions of the USA Patriot Act as unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled last month the act cannot be used to authorize secret searches and wiretapping to gather criminal evidence - instead of intelligence gathering - without violating the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures.
The FBI has already admitted violations.
http://www.showmenews.com/2007/Mar/20070309News021.asp
Federal audit: FBI violates Patriot Act
Agency conducted searches without proper authorization.
Published Friday, March 9, 2007
WASHINGTON (AP) - The FBI improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA Patriot Act to secretly obtain personal information about people in the United States, a Department of Justice audit concluded today.
And for three years the FBI has underreported to Congress how often it forced businesses to turn over the customer data, the audit found.
- Reply to this comment
- Draftreid ,
You have the *** nerve to call someone who doesn''t agree with you a ''nazi goosestepper'', when it is people like you who support the patriot act that want to take away American freedoms that are more Nazi like! American''s privacy IS BEING VIOLATED! Just because they may not have gotten to you yet, doesn''t me it''s not happening!
To quote a German pastor in 1945: "%u201CIn Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn''t speak up because I wasn''t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn''t speak up because I wasn''t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn''t speak up because I wasn''t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn''t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.%u201D - Reply to this comment
- Kat,
You''ve got a date! g I like your style and common sense, hon.
Love ya too.
Draftreid - Reply to this comment
