Comments on: Could Nobel Prize Spur Gore To Run In '08?

Grassroots Groups Urging Former Vice President To Enter Presidential Race

Add a Comment See all 269 Comments
by hawksprings October 12, 2007 2:22 AM EDT

Run, Al, Run. You need to lose some weight.


So, sftodd, you think Algore knows how to be a leader, huh?

Is it how to be a leader in fundraising at Buddhist Temples?
Is it how to be a leader in fundraising using White House phones?
Maybe it''s how to be a leader in using 20 times the energy that the average home uses in your mansion?
Or could it be he knows how to be a leader in encouraging people to buy "carbon credits" from his bogus company of which he is the founder and chairman?
Reply to this comment
by sftodd October 12, 2007 2:03 AM EDT
Al Gore makes all other politicians look like 100% prostit*tes. Here''s a man that knows how to be a leader and how to change public opinion rather scurrying to follow it like the rest of the republican and democratic rats.
Reply to this comment
by mocalleo October 12, 2007 1:17 AM EDT
LONDON %u2014 A High Court judge in London has turned film critic, highlighting "nine scientific errors" in Al Gore''''s documentary, An Inconvenient Truth. The judge said some of the errors had arisen in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration" to support the former US vice-president''''s thesis on global warming.

WHY ISN''''T CBS REPORTING THIS!!!!


Sorry NeoCommies, but the truth does matter

..

Al Gore was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize.

So what?!?

Rush Liimbaugh was also nominated for the Nobel Peace prize.

Liberals would sh*t if he won.

squeak, squeak, squeak
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 12:08 AM EDT
CALIFORNIAR -- I am cutting and pasting, but my own words typed up in a word document. I alreay forseen that I would eventuall have to crush your intellect, so I wanted to get a head start.

Looks like it worked because you already dont have an answer to what I posted on here and your already running away like a little BIOOOTCH
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 12:05 AM EDT
And finally: The 4 worst SOCIALISTS in the history of man: Stalin, Mau, Hitler and Pol-Pot. All atheists, all socialists, and all failures. Just like the Dumb-o-cratic party.
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 12:02 AM EDT
2. Issue: Their %u201CMantra%u201D is to harp on tax cuts for the %u201CRich%u201D. It%u2019s the same old tired act that you keep hearing every election cycle.
Problem: The problem is is that the rich, are already paying the majority of the taxes in this country. The middle class is paying significantly more (percentage wise), and the lower class, are paying the least. Why keep falling for that tired act. So, having said that, what it all boils down to is this: Dumb-o-ocrats want to take your hard earned money, no matter what class your in, and redistribute that evenly across the board to people that don%u2019t deserve it.

3. Issue: Weak on Defense and have no answer on how to combat terrorism.
Problem: This is a funny one. Just listen to the Democratic response every time they are asked about how to deal with the terrorism threat. I don%u2019t have to elaborate on this one. It%u2019s strictly a %u201CCut and Run%u201D policy. Dumb-o-crats do not care what happens to Iraqis and the rest of the region if we pull out too soon. Just pull the troops out because I think that%u2019s what the majority of the Americans want and that will get me elected%u2026%u2026 Another fatal mistake for the Dumbs and that will lead to Giuliani as being OUR next President!
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 12:00 AM EDT
Socialism - system of social organization in which property and the distribution of income are subject to social control rather than individual determination or market forces.(Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2007)
Now, I ask you liberals out there, does this not exemplify what Hillary Clinton and the rest of her ilk%u2019s party stands for? Government controlled health care %u2013 Income Redistribution -- The Democratic Party%u2026.
Why would you liberals want to vote for a Democrat? For you see, here is the problem with the Democratic Party (Closet Socialists):
1.Issue: They want to exercise government control over your health care
Problem: If that occurs, you will lose all the rights you currently have for healthcare. For one, the govt will not be able to afford for everyone%u2019s health care. There go your tax increases ! Do you want to know what they will do next? They will start dictating what%u2019s coverable, and what%u2019s not. For example, if you%u2019re a smoker, forget it%u2026no long term coverage. Look at California and all the smoking bans going on. Why is that? It%u2019s a heavily Democratic state. Another example would be government mismanagement of hardware and medicines. That equals long wait times, greater time that goes by before you can even make an appt, etc%u2026. Just ask Canada. It%u2019s in socialized health care system is in shambles but yet, they only have a quarter of the people we have.
To be continued%u2026%u2026
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:55 PM EDT
mh4cbs1 -- News flash from History "Bill Clinton ordered a strike against the serbo-croats and bombed the Chinese Embassy by mistake"......all those innocent people. My oh My.....
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 October 11, 2007 11:53 PM EDT
From the AP wire service.... "U.S. troops backed by attack aircraft killed 19 suspected insurgents and 15 civilians, including nine children, in an operation Thursday targeting al-Qaida in Iraq leaders northwest of Baghdad, the military said."

NINE Innocent Children snuffed out by US TERROR Operation.

''''Shock and Awe'''', which continues to this day, IS Terror. It is Terror with a $500 Billion dollar budget.

Most Germans didn''''t see Hitler as evil. They believed his lies. They were even inspired by him. Sound familiar? If the Iraqis hadn''''t fought back to rid their land of foreign occupiers, Bush would have invaded Iran by now on his way to build the 4th Reich.
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:51 PM EDT
Hmmmm...that''s interesting, I believe we''ve been attacked by terrorists as far back as the late 70''s.....I dont believe Bush was in office then. Do you?

Well, it doesnt matter CALIFORNIAR, I''m not trying to convince you to change your mind. I''m just trying to debate with you and show people on here that your actually a "Media Matters" radical that really doesnt know anything about Geo-Politics at all.
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:44 PM EDT
CALIFORNIAR - Hmmmm...I will give you one credit, we have spent a hell of a lot of money, that''s for sure.

Now, to be blatantly honest, I dont know where you came up with "We dont know how to fight terrorism"...in fact, we are the only ones that ARE fighting the terroists.

Although, your sister Nancy Pelosi and your blood brothers Harry Reid and Jack-Off Murtha have tried to undermine us at every turn. And failed miserably :)
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:37 PM EDT
CALIFORNIAR -- Dont be so hasty. You will not want to embarrass yourself when Giuliani wins the election.

At any rate, perhaps you tell us why you want to vote for a Dumb-o-crat and if that Dumb-o-crat wins, what benefits to this country will be attributed to that election?
Reply to this comment
by rohink-2009 October 11, 2007 11:35 PM EDT
Californiar, you are acting like a spoiled child. You gave me exactly what I wanted. I enjoyed it. Thanks
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:31 PM EDT
Your right Californiar....I''m jealous. You got me. I''m wrong.....
Reply to this comment
by rohink-2009 October 11, 2007 11:28 PM EDT
HEY ROHINK, it''''s a good thing you''''re not a comedian, because you''''re not funny. You''''re also bitter, but I understand because i know deep down you know a Democrat will be taking the oath of office in january 2009 :)
`````````
Hey Californiar, I wasn''t trying to be a comedian, I just enjoy watching you freak shows spout off!
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:27 PM EDT
replace excepted with accepted
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 11, 2007 11:25 PM EDT
CALIFORNIAR: HAHAHAHA. Because of gore, I''m surfing right now? The internet was invented by the Dept of Defense. After its explosion, AL "BORE" Gore just happened to be a Senator at the time and contributed, along with a whole slew of people, money to the ongoing project.

Cut the BS on Al Gore. He''s a Buffoon that has finally excepted his defeat (twice, mind you) and has now created another hoax to keep himself in the limelight.
Reply to this comment
by luigi999-2009 October 11, 2007 11:23 PM EDT
Gore is nothing more than a FAKE! This idiot is no more deserving of a Nobel Prize than Michael Vick. Gore is a phony who constantly seeks the spotlight. I think he represents ALL democrats.
Reply to this comment
by rohink-2009 October 11, 2007 11:22 PM EDT
It might be fun, then I could watch him lose again. What would be even more fun would be to have Rush Limbaugh beat him out for the nobel prize.
Reply to this comment
by hanginchad2 October 11, 2007 11:12 PM EDT
A Nazi bootlicker, moi??? I''ve NEVER voted for a Rethuglican presidential candidate, and I''ve never said GWB would be a good prez. He''s a disaster, just like Al would be. You guys are nuts.
Reply to this comment
See all 269 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: