Comments on: Fred Thompson Prepares For First Debate

Focus Will Be On Former Senator At Tomorrow's Sixth Republican Debate

[speakinup]

katg21 - don''t feed the troll j-whitman. You''ll find he never gives good documentation, but expects you to. He makes outrageous statments - flat out lies and semi-truths, twisting words, changing topics when proven wrong and like a pig, he likes to wallow in the mud. So, just don''t waste your energy on this fly looking for a T urd to eat up.

[katg21]

Just what does Hillary Clinton have to do with my comment about a PROFESSIONAL actor having to practice for weeks?
Posted by jn122736

The way I look at it Hillary''s a PROFESSIONAL actor too. Well, maybe more of a PROFESSIONAL liar. Thought the comparison was clear.

I don''t care which way you go, it''s a free country.

[jn122736]

katg21,
Just what does Hillary Clinton have to do with my comment about a PROFESSIONAL actor having to practice for weeks?

Most candidates have to practice before debates because it takes a lot more practice to lie than to tell the truth.

BTW, I am neither a registered democrat nor republican.

I can understand why you would jump to your conclusion however because almost any TRUTHFUL statement about republicans of late, and this administration in particular, will be essentially critical.

[katg21]

I WONDER IF CBS IS WORKING OVERTIME TO AVOID COVERING THIS STORY....
Posted by One_American at 06:34 PM : Oct 08, 2007

No need to wonder.

[one_american]

Here is the news that the liberal media is ignoring today:

Hillary Clinton has hired Sandy Berger as her National Security Advisor to her campaign.

You remember Sandy Berger - the guy who worked as National Security Adviser to Bill Clinton - and who also pled guilty to stealing National Archive documents by stuffing them in his pants and socks, and stashing them under a construction trailer near the National Archives building, and took the documents home and cut them up with scissors...

...yah, that guy.

Well, he has joined the Hillary team now.

Only problem is - he is barred from gaining access to any National Security information.

That means that if Hillary discloses any information, SHE IS GOING TO JAIL.

Some speculate that the documents showed how Bill Clinton failed to take action on National Security issues, which is why Bill Clinton had Sandy Berger destroy them.

I WONDER IF CBS IS WORKING OVERTIME TO AVOID COVERING THIS STORY....

[one_american]

Here is the news that the liberal media is ignoring today:

Hillary Clinton has hired Sandy Berger as her National Security Advisor to her campaign.

You remember Sandy Berger - the guy who worked as National Security Adviser to Bill Clinton - and who also pled guilty to stealing National Archive documents by stuffing them in his pants and socks, and stashing them under a construction trailer near the National Archives building, and took the documents home and cut them up with scissors...

...yah, that guy.

Well, he has joined the Hillary team now.

Only problem is - he is barred from gaining access to any National Security information.

That means that if Hillary discloses any information, SHE IS GOING TO JAIL.

Some speculate that the documents showed how Bill Clinton failed to take action on National Security issues, which is why Bill Clinton had Sandy Berger destroy them.

I WONDER IF CBS IS WORKING OVERTIME TO AVOID COVERING THIS STORY....

[katg21]

Defense Secretaries, generals including Adm. Fallon the head of all our military forces in the Middle East, Far East & Africa & much more say you are wrong & we are goinig in the opposite direction.
Posted by j-whitman at 06:22 PM : Oct 08, 2007

Opposite direction of peace? You''re *** straight. How would you suggest we accomplish peace...leave Iraq? Truth is no one has an answer for how to obtain peace because it is impossible. They have waged war against us and we''re working with their timetable. No Democrat or Republican could ever bring peace to that region. We cannot afford to turn a blind eye to what''s going on in Iraq/Iran, we must stay. Peace is a lovely dream but not in our lifetime and that is not our fault. Why don''t you all ask the terrorists to declare peace; it''s all in their hands.

[j-whitman]

katg21,,,, You should start doing some research on your own instead of listening to anyone conected with the GOP ----- Too many think tanks, foreign policy experts both democrat & republican, past State Dept. Secretaries, Defense Secretaries, generals including Adm. Fallon the head of all our military forces in the Middle East, Far East & Africa & much more say you are wrong & we are goinig in the opposite direction.

[katg21]

The peace would be possible only with the Democrats, but ok, I will try not to be so angry
Posted by SuhaAlNafa

I can see why you might think that; being from another country and all, but you are wrong. We were attacked by Alqaeda in a time of "peace"; over 3,000 of our people were incinerated. So I ask you, what does peace look like from your point of view? From where I''m standing, the only people who can declare peace are the terrorists and that is not going to happen any time soon. We must stay on the offense and the best candidate to do that for us is a Republican. Democrats believe in doing nothing and surrender. No matter what anyone says, the most important job that the President has to do is to protect his/her own people and that is exactly what President Bush has done. It really is unfortunate that you and the left in this country can''t understand that.

[j-whitman]

gkc99,,, It''s more like ideaology & politics continuing our 60 year old policies of supporting Isreal''s zionism & fueling the problems of terrorism