Comments on: Dems Fail Again To Pass Anti-War Bill
Senate Blocks Measure To Order U.S. Troops Home From Iraq In 9 Months
- Betray Us has been out there on the blogosphere for months.
Moveon just used what has been circling since the man first opened his mouth at the behest of Bush. - Reply to this comment
- I have to admit that I agree about one thing with republicans: The Moveon ad was way outta line. The general has spent a significant portion of his life moving up in the corporation. I''m sure he did the go-along to get-along thing often. But I looked at his uniform. You don''t get those things for free. Stars, maybe. But service decorations?....... Yeah his and Crocker''s testimony was coached. What do ya think loony''s foto-op was for?
- Reply to this comment
- "Dems Fail Again To Pass Anti-War Bill"
The headlines should read:
Neocons Fail Again to Allow Troops to Come Home.
Or: Conservatives Successful in Blocking Ending War, Against the Wishes of Entire Nation
Or: Senate Congratulates Itself in Continuing Loss of Iraqi and US Lives in Useless War
Or: Bush Wins Again, Using His Cronies to Back His Bogus War. - Reply to this comment
- One_American ,,,,,,
.. Just calling the bill to give our troops the time for training & rest they need an "Anti-War Bill" is a betrayal of trust to America -
-- It actually forces this administration to increase the numbers for our military to insure an honorable outcome....... And provide a new direction - Reply to this comment
- pwrslm,,,, Maybe you should pay closer attention to the arguments on what our Constitution does provide to our Congress & the Seperation of Powers...
... This Iraq War of Roses is a major Failure & a Humanitarian Crises the world hasn''t seen since the Holocaust ---
--- Why ? You might ask.. A Lock Step GOP with bad Bush Strategies & Policies - Reply to this comment
- Petraus has his eye on the seat Bush currently is staining. With ambitions like that, you do not go against a) The Party, and b) a wealthy future endorser/backer of your political aims.
Petraus has his own personal agenda and if he seeks POTUS, then his voice and the GOP voice must be one and the same.
Does the evidence support that Petraus puts:
Political party before country (Whatever Bush wants)
personal agenda before national interests (presidency)
personal agenda before party (my career before country) - Reply to this comment
- ...and the Democrats FAIL YET AGAIN TODAY TO PASS A ANTI-WAR BILL!
But they still push ahead with their failed policy:
"I ask my Republican colleagues for the courage and wisdom to join the American people and bring our troops home," [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid said Friday morning. "Courage and wisdom demands that we do such."
Harry Reid knows nothing about courage or wisdom, since he posesses neither of those attributes, nor does he have any respect for those who do.
Bad form, Dirty Harry. - Reply to this comment
- The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer", I''''m wathing "Washington Week" --
--- If you want to stay informed of anything other that dishonerable GOP BS, you might tune in.
Posted by j-whitman
So what exactly is honorable about gossip columnists on TV? - Reply to this comment
- mbcsmith,,, After a full afternoon of news then the "The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer", I''m wathing "Washington Week" --
--- If you want to stay informed of anything other that dishonerable GOP BS, you might tune in. - Reply to this comment
- I didnt realize that the constitution gave congress any rights in dictating how to fight a war....there should be a distinct separation of powers there, Congress is given power to declair war, but he power to wage war is firmly vested in the Executive Branch. This keeps them both in Check, a war machine that cannot arbitrarily declair war, and a Congress that cannot run one.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




