Comments on: Clinton Calls For Universal Health Care
Plan Requires Every American To Have Insurance, With Assistance To Help Defray Cost
Add a Comment See all 942 Comments
- Used to be.. a fella came home after werk.. turned on de teevee.. and it was a hour. 1 hour! And den it was dun.. Now its just a buncha ********* bullshyyt philosophies. Thinktanks.. peckkkerscandals.. wars on turnips.. de skies de limit.
- Reply to this comment
- Slim - it was a vicious analogy implying the very worst of those whom I believe have a lot to loose in this proposal.
- Reply to this comment
- I blame the messenger..
Dis her lady? She used to have her pears picked every season! EVERY SEASON! Dey came in by de truckload and worked der azzzes off.. Now? Now its just a pile of spoil.
Deez here presidents? Dey used to ****** de ****** trees in de back yard! Dey used to stick der ****** peckkkers in watermelons! Now? Now its just a ****** up piece''a shyyt, dat office''a de presidency. And we''re at war wit whats likely the most hardline religion in all de werld.. "Gee.. I wonder why." *eyeroll* - Reply to this comment
- Slim - the problem I have is with the word "fair". We can all understand the concept but it can''t be applied in real life. Fair is relative to each individual. Socialist systems are created for the purpose of fair distribution of the wealth - and they have always failed. In very small communities it works because each individual is committed to that process. In a system as big as a nation it can''t work due to far to many people who will abuse it for personal gain.
Do I want health care for all Americans - yes. Do I trust any government agency to deliver that - no. And taking money out of peoples pockets to give to a new government agency to have them redistribute some smaller portion is the height of irrational delusion. It hasn''t worked in England over the long run, it doesn''t work in Canada and it isn''t working elsewhere.
I want a debate on this, open and fair discussions but more government oversight is not good. - Reply to this comment
- I call that stereotyping and irrational.
Abbe was trying to make an analogy, on that one jimmy - Reply to this comment
- Peckkkkertracks? Vagggina juice? Whats next? Boogers? Poop samples? Huh? Does a "journalist" have de ******* conscience of a cartoon?
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by realpatriot1 at 11:16 AM : Sep 18, 2007
Yah we''ve gotten off subject, a bit. Just like any conversation tends to do, from time to time.
But know one wants to be forced to buy something, when the system is broken! - Reply to this comment
- The Law of Unintended Consequence is a pile''a shyyt the media dun stepped in. It used to be politicians tried to solve a problem, and everybody figered it out real fast.. "Ain''t no way, fella.. dat yer de cure''a dis here problem! Go back to Washington."
Now its the media''s turn. - Reply to this comment
- slim1h2o - below is the post made by abbe91 at 9:59 this morning.
"We have already heard this argument before ...
How am I going to run my cotton plantation without slaves ? Too bad for them. I need them to keep my lifestyle."
That statement implies that anybody who disagrees with having more taken from them to give to others must be:
A - a rich slave holder
B- Wealthy living in luxury
C- Whinney and greedy
I call that stereotyping and irrational. - Reply to this comment
- Just... hand''em a tomato. And say: "Make me a story." They can do it. A ******** tomato.
- Reply to this comment
- rhs648/slim1h2o,
Did you guys read the article? It doesn''t appear so from your comments.
The proposal calls for consumer choice. People who are happy with what they have can keep it. The government won''t be controlling what benefits are offered, the competitive market will still do that.
What the proposal does is regulate abuses in the market, such as denying coverage or claims for patients deemed to have "pre-existing conditions".
The insurance companies can currently deny any person or claim they want. That''s what this addresses.
It''s like forcing the Chinese to improve product safety, only in this case the government is forcing the insurance companies to stop endangering public safety by denying coverage and the payment of claims. - Reply to this comment
- Thats why I can''t find a jury of my peers, they''re all foxnews and cnn....But we digress....LOL
- Reply to this comment
- They cause trouble, slim. They''re de cause of everything. And we''re de effect.
All dem kids in highschool who used to tattle on you.. deyz all became CNN and Foxnews "journalists". - Reply to this comment
- Posted by donnie900 at 11:08 AM : Sep 18, 2007
Yah, they talk everything to deaf,....haha get it! LOL - Reply to this comment
- Posted by jimmyc1955 at 10:59 AM : Sep 18, 2007
No ones'' mentioned race, but you. abbe just wants a fair and just system, so do I. It aint coming though! - Reply to this comment
- slim, its this 24/7 dialogue''a bullshyyt. If we''re smart.. IF WE''RE SMART! We''ll go back to de 6 o''clock news. And shut down these 24/7 manipulators.
Rosie O''Donnel said it best: "Yaz can''t talk 24/7 witout suck''n on some *****." - Reply to this comment
- Donnie - other than being foul is there any point to your witless rambling?
- Reply to this comment
- And illegal immigration? Uh-uh. Terrorism? Uh-uh. Taxes? Uh-uh. Healthcare? Free air conditioners? Surplus? Peace? Prosperity? Uh-uh.
Vagggina juice. - Reply to this comment
- THIS WHOLE THING! Is their fault..
Who is "their",,donnie? - Reply to this comment
- Its the truth, slim. These people? They don''t know peckkkker from vagggina.. They rely on.. THEY RELY ON! The exclusive..
In fact slim? I''d venture a guess? That this whole thing.. THIS WHOLE THING! Is their fault.. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
