Comments on: GOP Rivals Agree On Iraq, Spar On Abortion

9 Republican Presidential Candidates Face Off In Live Iowa Debate

Add a Comment See all 149 Comments
by johnpatrick9 August 6, 2007 10:48 AM EDT
So eager to shed blood and treasure abroad and to do so little at home!!! What a morally corrupt group of individuals and what a corrupt (Republican) party that buys this absurdity. Three cheers for those within this pitiful group who bravely stand against these puppets.
Those of you who support this rampant fascism and militarism: go to Baghdad, send your sons and daughters to and then when you and they come home dead and maimed...in your soul and heart of hearts can you say: "Glad to have taken a bullet for bush and the oil corporations in Baghdad....it was worth my life, my arm, my sight, my leg, the death and or maiming of my son and daughter to be physically ruined for life for a nation called Iraq. Thank you George Bush for giving me this opportunity to be killed and maimed to save your chickenhawk legacy. WAKE UP...THE TERRORISM IS WITHIN OUR CITY GATES AND IT IS THE REPUBLICAN FASCIST PARTY.
Reply to this comment
by oakishpines August 6, 2007 10:41 AM EDT


pharoahs congresses companies can't feed the world?

the world really feeds itself anyway?

they just tax the world to reduce demand for tax the world?

in order to fill the tax the world voids that already exist?

voids that would be filled by the 'enemy' anyway?

like tornados filling voids between air masses?

though kids are raped and killed more during peace and raped and killed 99% more during wars to tax the world?


if two percent of folk are more or less capable of feeding the world?

and half the world lives below global poverty line at two dollars a day?

then a minimum of 4% of the budget of the poorest half is required to feed the world?

and they needn't change their shopping habits?

folk have but to focus on those that the poorest and richest alike already spend on to feed the world?


Reply to this comment
by donnie900 August 6, 2007 10:40 AM EDT
The executive office has been hijacked by big money! The power to declare war! Hijacked! By big money!

Patriotism? Faith? Conservatism? These are just punchlines! Punchlines in the face of secret money dealings!

And I'm sorry, Mr. Blue Suit.. that is unacceptable.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet August 6, 2007 10:37 AM EDT
I'm going for Romney. The nation needs another Religious Fascist to divide us even more! Sieg Heil ROMNEY!!
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 August 6, 2007 10:36 AM EDT
I don't see how the story could be "agree on Iraq". That Paul guy came up with a sound idea of what america's war machine has become, and how its completely diverted the constitution in its declarations of these wars.. Wars that it happens to lose all the time.

It is so wrong.. so wrong. For presidents like these to decide the fates of these young men and women based on some.. special op, secret op, socio-engineering crusade that always seems to wind up getting us in more trouble that when we started. It is a very real and tangible thing! This notion that we ourselves are what the enemy claims. That its not propoganda.. that we're some rich arabs on-call bodyguard. That its not propoganda that we violate the borders of sovereign territories in our.. pretentious mandates.

Napoleon, and Stalin, and Hitler, and all them others! Were just like we are now! We have no mandate to make democracy in the world! I have no idea where a "conservative" would ever get that idea in his head. And yet? For the sake of arms deals? And big money? We violate our own ideals!

No war should ever be declared in this country, except thru Congress!
Reply to this comment
by donnie900 August 6, 2007 9:47 AM EDT
Hey jerry, its loser. Not looser. A looser is a less tightening.. or a lady whose open all the time with her legs. A loser is what yer talk'n about I think.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 August 6, 2007 6:15 AM EDT
NONE OF US IS FREE UNLESS ALL ARE FREE!!!

WHY IS IT NOT ONE MUSLIM COUNTRY GRANTS EQUAL RIGHTS TO NON MUSLIMS???

FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM SAYS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATES ISLAM LAW...

Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

For example, in 1981, the Iranian representative to the United Nations, Said Rajaie-Khorassani, articulated the position of his country regarding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by saying that the UDHR was "a secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition", which could not be implemented by Muslims without trespassing the Islamic law.

http://www.un.org/terrorism/
http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.html
http://www.un.org/

But the accepted assumption in India is that most of India's Muslims were converted to Islam through the sword. Meaning the Indians were given an option between death or adopting Islam. The third option was getting examined in Islam religion along with heavy taxes- Jeziya (poll tax) and Kharaj (property tax).

http://adaniel.tripod.com/Islam.htm

this is what fascist nazi islam calls peace....

are you ready to live under islam rule as a non muslim???

apartheid fascist nazi islamic style

Rights of Non-Muslims in an Islamic State
http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/islamic_state.htm
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 August 6, 2007 5:59 AM EDT
Posted by j-whitman at 12:29 AM : Aug 06, 2007

no one ever accused you of being able to read jihad j... hahahaha

From May of 1801 to June 10, 1805, sailors and Marines of the young American nation fought battles immortalized in a line of the Marine Hymn: %u201Cto the shores of Tripoli.%u201D As American forces approached Tripoli on land threatening to capture it, Karamanli suddenly became interested in negotiations. The war ended with a treaty exchanging prisoners, Americans giving Karamanli another $60,000 in ransom and an agreement from the Muslims to cease attacks on U.S. ships.


But for a Muslim to keep his word to an infidel at the expense of opportunities to expand Islamic power is the Islamic equivalent of a mortal sin. In 1807, Muslim pirate attacks on American ships began anew. As a result Americans led by President James Madison fought Algerians in the Second Barbary War in 1815, leading to another treaty under which the Muslims paid American $10,000 for damages. The Algerian ruler almost immediately repudiated the new treaty after the U.S. departure and again began piracy and the enslavement of captured Christian sailors necessitating an 1816 Anglo-Dutch shelling of Algiers and ultimately the colonization of Algeria in 1830 and Tunisia in 1881 by France and Libya in 1911 by Italy.
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?6bdec278-6a71-4436-bc4d-29d1c54b0ad7
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers August 6, 2007 5:33 AM EDT
CORRECTED

As an independent voter I have watch this campaign season very closely over the past few months. The Democrats don't have a candidate I would vote for, Obama shot himself in the foot, when he said one week he would be willing to talk to any leader, and seek compromise, then the next said he would go into Pakistan with military force to seek out Osama Bin Ladan. Hilliary is more pro big business than Bill was. Not to mention she voted to go into Iraq. Lets see now who else is running on the Democrat side? Exactly, no body impressed or depressed me enough to even remember them.

Most of the Republicans spew the same old neocon rhetoric we been hearing for years.

Then there is Ron Paul, a real American who has time after time showed that he is for the citizens of America, and not the neocon right. He voted against invading Iraq, and the Patriot Act, and also believes the Federal reserve should be abolished, as well as the IRS, and most of the other over bloated government buracracy. He has never voted to raise taxes, and believes that most government handouts should be abolished. He was also a flight surgeon in the Air Force for 6 years. He also ran for President in the 1988 presidential election as the nominee for the Libertarian Party.

All of these reason are why I support Ron Paul for President.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers August 6, 2007 5:29 AM EDT
As an independent voter I have watch this campaign season very closely over the past few months. The Democrats don't have a candidate I would vote for, Obama shot himself in the foot, when he said one week he would be willing to talk to any leader, and seek compromise, then the next said he would go into Pakistan with military force to seek out Osama Bin Ladan. Hilliary is more pro big business than Bill was. Not to mention she voted to go into Iraq. Lets see now who else is running on the Democrat side? Exactly, no body impressed or depressed me enough to even remember them.

Most spew the same old neocon rhetoric we been hearing for years.

Then there is Ron Paul, a real American who has time after time showed that he is for the citizens of America, and not the neocon right. He voted against invading Iraq, and the Patriot Act, and also believes the Federal reserve should be abolished, as well as the IRS, and most of the other over bloated government buracracy. He has never voted to raise taxes, and believes that most government handouts should be abolished. He was also a flight surgeon in the Air Force for 6 years. He also ran for President in the 1988 presidential election as the nominee for the Libertarian Party.

All of these reason are why I support Ron Paul for President.
Reply to this comment
See all 149 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: