Comments on: Obama: War Vote "Irresponsible And Naive"

Criticized By Clinton Over Foreign Policy, Obama Uses Same Words To Jab At Her Iraq War Vote

[hawksprings]

Even though I'm a strong conservative, I like this Obama-whama-fofamma guy. MUCH more than I like Hillary.

Let's not have 4+ years of Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton-Clinton.

I think it's time for some new blood in the White House. Hillary needs to fade away and bake cookies.

...

[jetranger7]

Obama-Wamma Bamma Shamma, Bequiet !!!!

[one_american]

One thing good that would come out of an Obama presidency:

The token black comedians on "Saturday Night Live" would have tons of work & abundant material that just keeps writing itself...

[bennyblack1]

And in response to "no WMD's." Saddam Hussein was only a middleman. He had scientists experimenting with new WMD since about 1985, and formulated a bioligical agent that infects and kills birds in 1988. In the Persian Gulf war, our soldiers came home infected with some kind of disease that was caused by this chemical. The chemical, upon ingestion, mutated, and disappeared, leaving behind damage to the reproductive organs of our soldiers, producing malformed children in the United States. That desert was infected. Then, between 1992 and 2001, INS inspectors were invited by Saddam to check out its facilities. Who knew where the facilities were? Saddam. Do you really think he's going to show you the real arsenals? Furthermore, being that Saddam was really only a middleman, due to some satelite video that I saw, after INS was finished inspecting, vehicles were sited moving from various areas in Iraq toward the border of Iran. So, OF COURSE, there was no WMD. Saddam had lied, finagled, moved, hid, and accomplished his mission prior to his capture. Then, he was given up, and captured. And, now Iran has the technology. Now, all Al Queda has to do, is continue distracting the US. I'm not stupid. I've followed the events. It couldn't be any clearer.

[danielleclar]

***CLINTONS FEAR OF PROPAGANDA ALREADY LOOSED WITH HER
WORDS AROUND THE WORLD***

yes thats right she has already given those so called
"axis of evil" leaders propaganda, with her statement
at the debate

Yes those leaders are ALREADY using her words against
her

Check it out for yourself

For those who have access to those languages
please do your research.

***My friend (an english teacher) in S. Korea told me
that many Koreans are mad as hell at Clinton for her
words. Many there wanted a president who would start
out without negative rhetoric. They had hoped to build
positive relationships with their relatives up north,
but many fear it will go backwards***

well the fear of propaganda is already out there NOW.

Hillary is now seen in Korea as another BUSH !


VOTE AT WWW.CAPITALNEWS.ORG EVERYDAY

[samthetvcat]

Hillary beating Barack in the polls by something like 15 points - why pick a fight with him now? It just makes her look like an overbearing tyrant.

Also, this isn't exactly a 'slam-dunk' issue - even if the nuanced answer of Hillary's is technically more accurate, public sentiment is more along the lines of what Barack said so most of us aren't really going to see this as a case of 'naivete' given that it's just talk. Has there ever even been an instance in which a President has talked with a head of state and it's been used for 'propaganda' purposes with great adverse consequences? It's just talk!

And Barack shouldn't get caught up in the petty namecalling . . . these two are starting to look like Rosie O'Donnell and Donald Trump and people got so sick of their bashing neither of them are on tv any more.


Ugh!

[bennyblack1]

I think, after looking at these opinions, that you are all wrong. I don't think that the United States should be talking to ANYONE. Frankly, we need to be circling the wagons around the United States, saving who we can save IN the United States, and pursuing criminals, terrorists, and illegal immigrants. What I understand that most people don't, is that the United States has lost focus of the United States. I understand why, now, that other countries didn't want to participate with George Bush in Iraq. I understand that the other countries understood on a larger scale the consequences of aiding Iraq. They also know that sacrificing their own country for another is wrong. These other countries are IN and around the area, and know more than what they are telling us. Rest assured, if Osama is still alive, they know it, and aren't telling. We have inserted ourselves into a situation that we must pull out of. Or, we risk the sovereignty of the United States, and the lives of innocent people due to our lack of responsibility to OUR OWN COUNTRY. Wake up, people. When it comes to you, there is no party affiliation. It's YOUR opinions, YOUR views, and YOUR ability to connect the dots to accurately assess the actions of the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court. Without the people, there is no United States. It's just another totalitarian state.

[prinzowhales]

hopetrumps-I live in the middle of the woods in North Carolina and wrote to Edwards telling him that the evidence presented by the Regime for war was a crock. If I knew, Edwards should have known--and Rockefellar with his inside sources and family's private intelligence network, most certainly knew--that Saddam and Iraq were toothless. All Edwards had to do was DUE DILIGENCE!! A Marine officer on the UN inspection team said there were no WMDs. The Regime gave that team dozens upon dozens of leads that produced exactly nothing...nada...zip!
These leads are the product our intelligence gathering aparatus...SIGINT, HUMINT, ELINT... and this proved --BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT--that Saddam had no WMDs.

Edwards is using the same PR argument that the Administration used when the truth--that was readily apparent before the war--was finally revealed...They both claimed to have been deceived. Obviously, this was a lie--as the failure of Intelligence to show WMDs before and after the war conclusively prove...the set of facts regarding the war did not change after the invasion.

[gunownerdan]

If Hitlery Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama are the best the demotards can do, America's in even bigger trouble.
Dr. Ron Paul seems to be the only candidate who would obey the presidential oath of office.

[fryedbread]

I'm equally tired of both of them.