Comments on: Clinton: Obama "Irresponsible" And "Naive"
Democratic Rivals Clash Over Obama Saying He'd Be Willing To Meet With Heads Of Rogue Nations
- Obama gets my vote.
- Reply to this comment
- Hillary's right. He is naive. Someone should tell him he's not in Kansas anymore.
- Reply to this comment
- Obama is turning out to be a real disappointment. He's is the John McCain of the DNC - high hopes at the start, but the more we learn, the less we like.
His campaign even had a hard time backtracking:
"Obama adviser David Axelrod said on Tuesday that Obama would not just meet blindly with such leaders but only after diplomatic spadework had been accomplished."
Bulls-h-i-t. Obama himself said he would meet with those leaders without precondition. His days are numbered. - Reply to this comment
- ban_Islam,
Nobody poses and flip flops more than Guliani. Hillary is not a typical woman, a typical woman would've kicked her loser husband to the curb.
US18988,
We're you Al Jolson in a previous life or just an ignorant slug in this one?
Hawksprings,
It sums up the Bush mission accomplished precisely. - Reply to this comment
- Little by little the USA Sen. Joe McCarthy helped build in the 50's by making Americans fear the enemy within is dissapearing.
You can only cry wolf so many times before people realize you're fooling with them. And thanks to Bush and his ilk Americans now have a better sense of who our real enemies are and who aren't. And why, and how.
There's less fear and more wisdom and that's why Obama resonates with so many people. He knows the old order is coming to an end so he's preparing the ground for the new order by running for president. It really doesn't matter if he doesn't win this time. But in the future, after another Democratic or Republican candidate keep on going with the old regime with the same old tired arguments and the same hypocrisy that has fueled our foreign policies, voters will have a better understanding of why Obama speaks the way he does.
He along with a new generation of Americans are creating a new language, a new way of thinking that will set the USA straight by using our power wisely.
Thank you Obama for having the balls to speak against the old regimes, Democrat and Republican, and forging forward with a new vision we sorely need after more than half a century of irrational confrontations and bogus wars. - Reply to this comment
- We have a terrible crop of presidential candidates this coming election.
The Dems are totally useless, apart from their aggressive aim of having America surrender to a vastly inferior but extremely barbaric enemy, they have an abysmal track-record, esp. with their juvenile theatrics in Congress lately.
Hilary flip-flops her positions with her changing moods (typical woman) and then you have Obama, an inexperienced poser trying to make it in the big leagues but can't quite keep up with the 'big boys.'
Vote for Guiliani, he's liberal enough in most of his views, which will appeal to the leftists but more critically, he's very aggressive on the war on terror, something that's going to become much more important to the West over the next few years and decades. - Reply to this comment
"Irresponsible" And "Naive"
Sums up the Democrat Party perfectly, doesn't it.
...- Reply to this comment
- Posted by US18988 at 01:48 AM : Jul 25, 2007
That was lame - Reply to this comment
- Remarks by Boy Obama right after the battle of Gettysburg.
Mr. Linkum, wi' all dooo rispect i like it jus fine with my Massa Byrd and eating dat watermelon all day long. Why you send dem white boys from the noth to com don here and fight dem good ol' boys. you should talk to Jef Davis and Nat Forrest...mabeee dat Quantrill kid too. Dey do nuthin' wrong. I se talk to dem - and dey keep me on the plantation singing Stephen Foster songs all night long.
I se tak to dem, Mr. Linkum, and I se get to be big boy on plantation - dats what Mr. Byrdie sez me. U.S. soljars no need to come here. Con-fed-eraccccy is jus fin. - Reply to this comment
- Clinton is using the Republican playbook, parsing every word an opponent makes and then repeatedly pouncing on a perceived "gaffe". This is small-minded and unseemly for anybody aspiring to be the leader of this great nation. Americans should demand someone with great ideas to be their leader, not someone who tries to win by silly, negative tactics such as this one.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.



