Comments on: All-Night Iraq Debate Brings Little Change
Republicans Continue Filibuster Of Democratic-Led Legislation On U.S. Troop Withdrawal
- If Sen. Saxby Chambliss actually said that the Levin/Reed amendment would tell our enemies when to take over Iraq he's wrong. Why? because they already have thanks to our total mismanagement of the war from the get go. And who are our enemies anyway? Are they al-Qaida, the Sunis, the Sheites, the Kurds? Your choice Mr. Senator.
- Reply to this comment
- You intentionally create havok.. and in that.. religious extremist atheist political mind'a yer's, you figure it some sorta payback.. for what they done on 9/11.
You guys have that psychology prison guard disease. Intentionally making people feel bitter about yaz, and calling it diplomacy. Yer subjective wars are evil.. Yer blanket statements are evil.. Yer judgementalisms.. yer racisms.. yer nationalisms.. Its all evil.
Its the evil politician. The machiovelli machine created.. - Reply to this comment
- Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R) said the bill "is the wrong approach at the wrong time." UH, and the right time would be?
Posted by drummer94 at 12:29 PM : Jul 18, 2007
Chambliss is a right wing clone, these people cannot think for themselves so they join cults he's part of the cult know as agents of Satan, to join you must agree to worship money, support capitalism and take an oath to kill anyone that does not. You also must pretend to be a Christian it%u2019s part of the cults deception every fours years the group pretends to have an election for the last six years the leader of the cult is a man so unworthy of leadership only the Devil could bring him to power. Satan is the author of confusion and most of the people reading the book are either right wing Christianize cults groups or Islam radicals both parties need to be moved to a deserted island to kill each other off so the rest of the world can live a less chaotic life. - Reply to this comment
- If we believe the Zionist propaganda that Muslims want to kill all Americans, then what has taken them so long to get around to it?
Terrorism has been around a long time, so why haven't "Muslim extremists" been attacking the US for the last 200 years? Islam predates the US by about 1200 years. - Reply to this comment
- OpinionRules
The dems are going to congress AND the whitehouse next year. It is possible they will hold a super majority.
And it is not because of anything they have done, espcially. It is because of what the republicans have done. The republicans have caused such chaos and death that the American people are rebelling AGAINST THEM, rather than voting FOR the dems.
the Rep will have no one to blame but themselves for allowing themselves to follow a mad leader, who is determined to lead them to ruin. They have just kept on following him and will pay the price by being banished from office, FOR YEARS! - Reply to this comment
- You know what I sense with you people? This is gonna kill yaz.. You know what I sense with you people about this whole problem?
You don't want to find solutions. You treat the whole problem like you treat the criminals: With vile hostility, unsolutionable.
You never intended to solve anything, is my guess. Because you guys want a new cold war. - Reply to this comment
- liberals
At least the Bush administration hasn't used tanks and helicopters to attack Americans on their own soil, like the previous administration did at Waco.
Also, it wasn't the Bush administration who shredded the constitution by trying to replace "freedom of speech" with "political correctness".
That was also the previous administration.
... - Reply to this comment
- liberals
At least the Bush administration hasn't used tanks and helicopters to attack Americans on their own soil, like the previous administration did at Waco.
Also, it wasn't the Bush administration who shredded the constitution by trying to replace "freedom of speech" with "political correctness".
That was also the previous administration.
... - Reply to this comment
- thats why no one wants to get in the middle of this..
Posted by forthepeopl1 at 12:42 PM : Jul 18, 2007
Well who created the ones who have been attacking us since the WTC back in '93, or whenever it was? These fools have been probing us and testing us for years before 9/11. Why?
Because to them, we are the GREAT SATAN. To them, America will either be 'won over' for Allah or we will die. Look at what happened when the Dutch put some cartoons out.
It happens to christians all the time...no big deal. But these arseclowns killed each other as they were taking to the streets shouting 'death to the infidels.' We'll be fighting these extremeists for the next 50 years. - Reply to this comment
- Occupying Iraq or Afghanistan will only bleed this country of wealth and military strength and defensive abilities.
We do not need to occupy any country to fight terrorism.
Clinton used the right strategy in retaliating against offenses committed against us with strategic military strikes, although he probably should have gone farther in some instances.
Holding responsible, the country/countries where the attacks originated is the only workable defense.
All countries/nations must do all in their power to punish any and all citizens who actively participate in or encourage such attacks, be they religious groups or political factions.
If they refuse to do so, as in the case of Afghanistan & Bin Laden (Al Qaeda), the attack must be treated as an act of war and responded to accordingly. Most all other countries in the world would understand and accept any REASONABLE action like that.
Terrorism, per se, cannot actually be defeated, but it can%u2019t even be contained without the support of the rest of world. - Reply to this comment




