Comments on: All-Night Iraq Debate Brings Little Change
Republicans Continue Filibuster Of Democratic-Led Legislation On U.S. Troop Withdrawal
- "All-Night Iraq Debate Brings Little Change"
Did anyone really believe it would? - Reply to this comment
- seven-pesos - Last president that didn't come out of the south???
- Reply to this comment
- history shows what happens when southerners get the power in america.
the south has a dark and sordid past.
bush is just the latest chapter to come out of that most militaristic and extremist region of america.
the south never does good for america.
always war, hate, phony christian creeps and crooked republican snakes.
ha,ha,ha.
that's the south for you, folks! - Reply to this comment
- We never should have gone there; however, we did so we have an obligation to not abandon the real Iraqi people. They did not ask for this.
Posted by scottyusa at 05:00 PM : Jul 18, 2007
Very few people are demanding or expecting all US soldiers to be withdrawn, including me.
What I am demanding (like anyone cares) is that US forces stop being used as policemen. Iraq has more than enough people to provide their own police forces. It does not take years to train some guy to walk up and down a street waiting to be blown up.
The US military is not trained nor equipped to be policemen in Iraq or anywhere else. They should be confined to their fortified compounds and only used to protect civil affairs personnel involved in the actual reconstruction of Iraq. Or, providing assistance to Iraqis when requested to do so.
They should not be protecting the Iraqi "government." Nor should US taxpayers being paying mercenaries to do so.
Iraq belongs to Iraqis, not Americans. - Reply to this comment
- seven-pesos - by your name you came out of the south - South of the Border!!
- Reply to this comment
- somebody give me a joint!...
'cause i'm getting awful sick of these republican, christian creeps.
ho's, drugs, homos, child predators...
swaggart, foley, haggard, vitter...
all fine, upstanding, christian republican southerners...
only snakes come out of the bush loving south.
slave state, dixie republican, christian snakes.
ha,ha,ha.
nothing good comes out of the south. - Reply to this comment
- Can anyone explain why Israel has not sent troops to Afghanistan or Iraq?
Israel is the primary beneficiary of the "war on terror", so why isn't Israel doing anyting to help?
As a matter of fact, immediately following 9/11/01, Ariel Sharon ran to Washington and demanded over 20 billion dollars in grants, loans and loan guarantees. Why did we give Israel our money when we are fighting their fight?
Israel doesn't seem to be much of an ally. For $20 billion, we can buy lots of "allies." Including that staunch "ally" Pervez Musharraf, military dictator of Pakistan. He only cost $10 billion, but he is at least providing troops (sort of). - Reply to this comment
- ICEMAN_1960.................THANKS for the education today
- Reply to this comment
- i'd rather die as a muslim and get 72 virgins
than die as a christian and have to spend eternity with jerry falwell, pat robertson and jerry swaggart...
faith professing, bible thumping, bush loving dixie snakes.
ha,ha,ha.
war, hate, phony christian snakes, republican creeps...
nothing good comes out of the south. - Reply to this comment
- Can anyone explain how having US soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan is preventing anyone, Islamic extremist or otherwise, from detonating a car bomb at your local shopping center, school or anywhere else in your neighborhood?
And, if you can't, can you explain why you claim George Bush is "protecting Americans"?
Or, for that matter, why you think the "war on terror" is "keeping you safe"?
Thanks. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




