Comments on: Kucinich Blasts Edwards Over Debate Rules
Ohio Congressman And Democratic Presidential Candidate Says Rival Shows "A Consistent Lack Of Integrity"
- tcoleman12,
Re: "When was the last time anyone cared what Kicinich had to say?"
- Ending the illegal war in Iraq
- Ending corporate control of our government
- Impeachment of ******** Cheney
- Universal health care
- Repealing catastrophic and anti-democratic trade intitutions like NAFTA and the WTO
These are some of the issues that Kucinich brings to the forefront. If you don't know anyone that is interested in these issues, then you must live in a cave, or in Israel. - Reply to this comment
- "War mongering traitors like Edwards and Hillary have no patience for anyone who is not owned by AIPAC and big Corporations."--Posted by FeelFree1
And Edwards real name is Edwardstein, his mother was born in Israel, and he secretly attends a synagogue in Carolina. His wife practices Kabalah. Hillary had Jewish ancestors who were part of the international Zionist banker conspiracy financed by the Rothschildts, who secretly financed a takeover of New York by Rudy Gulianovich.
I only hope there are some Aryan of sufficient racial purity for the ********* of the Left. - Reply to this comment
- When was the last time anyone cared what Kicinich had to say?
- Reply to this comment
- Politics... We need mics everywhere. We need to know what is REALLY going on behind the scenes with both sides. I think we would be shocked to hear the way they talk behind the publics back. Would you keep a friend that did that to you?
- Reply to this comment
- We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group, I agree.
Posted by pepperp1 at 05:38 PM : Jul 13, 2007
I agree. First we should dump lars, didntinhale, mudrose, one_american, etc.
Anyone else?
Posted by RandalDS at 05:40 PM : Jul 13, 2007
Yes Donnie900 - Reply to this comment
- We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group, I agree.
Posted by pepperp1 at 05:38 PM : Jul 13, 2007
I agree. First we should dump lars, didntinhale, mudrose, one_american, etc.
Anyone else? - Reply to this comment
- We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group, I agree.
- Reply to this comment
- DETROIT (AP) - Democrats John Edwards and Hillary Rodham Clinton consider themselves among the top presidential candidates.
They were caught by Fox News microphones discussing their desire to limit future joint appearances to exclude some lower rivals after a forum in Detroit Thursday.
Edwards says, "We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group."
Clinton agrees, saying, "We've got to cut the number" and "they're not serious." She also says that she thought their campaigns had already tried to limit the debates and say, "We've gotta get back to it."
Probably NEVER will see this on CBS. Biased, biased, biased.
Posted by infidel_us at 10:06 AM : Jul 13, 2007
You were saying??? - Reply to this comment
- Time restrictions aren't really necessary, are they? I mean, you want to hear what these people have to say. Even if its the mundane.. Moderators are good for direction of the questioning.. maybe zeroing in. But the time restrictions for the answering isn't really necessary. If they ramble on, people can see that too.
One of the interesting things I find is how these people will never answer the questions.. specifically. - Reply to this comment
- Well that, or have longer debates.
- Reply to this comment
War mongering traitors like Edwards and Hillary have no patience for anyone who is not owned by AIPAC and big Corporations.
These two a-holes are deeply complicit in many of the most serious of the Bush regime crimes. I agree that fewer candidates should share the stage in the Democrat Party debates.
Edwards and Clinton should apologize to the people of the U.S. and the world, and resign in disgrace, or find themselves standing on the dock of a war crimes tribunal, next to the Bush regime butchers and traitors!- Reply to this comment




