Comments on: Coulter Attacks Give Edwards A Boost
Conservative Pundit's Swipes Help Democrat's Campaign Fundraising Efforts
- I can tell that JEG takes his playbook directly from Ann's. In a war of philosophical ideas calling your opponent names and wishing for their untimely demise never solved anything. This is what I hate about Coulter, she neglects the issues and goes for the personal attacks from the beginning. This is no way to win the hearts and minds of anyone.
- Reply to this comment
- Just what the heck do gibby's "comments" have to do with the article? Kinda sounds a little like donnie900, or worse. I like folgers.
- Reply to this comment
- As a conservative, all I can say is Ann Coulter embarrasses even me.
Posted by arealtexan at 11:09 AM : Jun 28, 2007
+ report abuse
exactly. Churchill was a conservative.
Shes not a conservative...shes a right wing wacko... theres a difference ( duh )
One of these millenia the right wing Bushie wackos will figure this out and we will get back to a sensible debate
gawd these wackjobs are dense !! - Reply to this comment
- As a conservative, all I can say is Ann Coulter embarrasses even me.
Posted by arealtexan at 11:09 AM : Jun 28, 2007
+ report abuse
exactly. Churchill was a conservative.
Shes not a conservative...shes a right wing wacko... theres a difference ( duh )
One of these millenia the right wing Bushie wackos will figure this out and we will get back to a sensible debate
gawd these wackjobs are dense !! - Reply to this comment
- BTW What are you LEFTIE LOONIES putting in your coffee these days?
Posted by JEGibbons at 11:10 AM : Jun 28, 2007
Cream, one sugar for the first cup, then black the rest of the day (It's a "nuance" thing). You? - Reply to this comment
- JEGibbons, you are just another hack. A lying judgemental hack who uses religion as an excuse to feel superior to other human beings just like you.
There isn't one ounce of truth in what you just posted.
Your words prove this is a war of ethics. Conservatives have none. They will use any lie, any stereotype, any propoganda to make others look bad. You do not conduct your own behavior by the very Book you use to judge others behaviors by. You are a pretender.
If I judged YOU by that same book, you would be more wanting in honest ethics than any liberal. - Reply to this comment
- ==From what I read neither of these words are even referred to. The word %u201Creligion%u201D relates to many different sects including Islam, Judaism, et al.==
Posted by jn122736 at 11:08 AM : Jun 28, 2007
You gotta be an ACLU attorney! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by yamuttya at 11:03 AM : Jun 28, 2007
Says You! Count those Red vs Blue States and do post again when you get up off the floor.
BTW What are you LEFTIE LOONIES putting in your coffee these days?
Posted by JEGibbons
JEG
For a while there you had it together but you lost it...buh bye......buh bye..... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by yamuttya at 11:03 AM : Jun 28, 2007
Says You! Count those Red vs Blue States and do post again when you get up off the floor.
BTW What are you LEFTIE LOONIES putting in your coffee these days? - Reply to this comment
- As a conservative, all I can say is Ann Coulter embarrasses even me.
- Reply to this comment
- JE -- you say that there can be no doubt that this country was founded on judeo-christian beliefs. I think if you look more closely, you will find that it was based on opposition to excesses and abuses within the judeo-christian establishments from whence they came. consider thanksgiving day as an example. It was founded on efforts to curb.
Posted by pombo47 at 10:41 AM : Jun 28, 2007
-----
I agree, and I would appreciate someone/anyone pointing out just where in the Constitution of the United States, either of the words, Christ, Christian, or Jesus is used. From what I read neither of these words are even referred to. The word %u201Creligion%u201D relates to many different sects including Islam, Judaism, et al. - Reply to this comment
- Legalizing drugs.
Killing babies in the womb, calling it a CHOICE.
Denying the victim JUSTICE in FAVOR of the criminal. All of it is a result of druggie minds / liberal thinking. It doesn't take a minister to point these things out.
THIS IS A WAR OF ETHICAL VALUES!
Posted by JEGibbons
Jeg
your time is gone. Sensible people dont follow this trash anymore.... there was a time but its gone.
In the 21st century people are looking for solutions to republicant messes, not more messes...
wake up...
smell the Folgers..... - Reply to this comment
- Wow.....In the two pics above, I actually think Edwards is more attractive than Ann Coulter. ROFL!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Legalizing drugs? By liberals? Where? OREGON
Liberals favor criminals over justice? When? MIKE NIFONG 2007?
Hinting that liberals have no ethics? WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
== "IT DEPENDS UPON WHAT YOUR DEFINITION OF THE WORD IS, IS?"==???
"What is it with you conservatives and war?" ROSIE THINKS THE CIA BLEW UP THE WTC!!!
And you think I'm an alarmist???
Wake up and sell the coffee! - Reply to this comment
- *** a chicken.
Posted by huskerarmy at 10:24 AM : Jun 28, 2007
Where he lives, I don't think this is illegal! lol
Guess you haven't heard about his "foundation?" Somewhat dubious at best. I'm sure it will be scrutinized very closely. If he's clean, well that will be that. But I'll be watching. - Reply to this comment
- I think we should contemplate that we are a nation of diversity, and that the political question is not necessarily what one thinks is in their own interest and instead look at things from the perspective of what is best for our nation as a whole. The divisiveness we are currently plagued with originates in the justification of self interest, but a house divided against itself is a disaster waiting to happen in this geopolitical world. I wonder if JE has ever considered "turning the other cheek" as a judeo-christian ethic. Monied interests love this divisiveness because it gives them power by default.
- Reply to this comment
- JE -- you say that there can be no doubt that this country was founded on judeo-christian beliefs. I think if you look more closely, you will find that it was based on opposition to excesses and abuses within the judeo-christian establishments from whence they came. consider thanksgiving day as an example. It was founded on efforts to curb.
- Reply to this comment
- Legalizing drugs. Killing babies in the womb, calling it a CHOICE. Denying the victim JUSTICE in FAVOR of the criminal. THIS IS A WAR OF ETHICAL VALUES! Posted by JEGibbons at 09:58 AM : Jun 28, 2007
JEGibbons, I call you on this garbage you have written. I post here to counter-act this kind of baseless stereotyping of liberals.
Give me one link or example that backs up one iota of the crud you have posted here.
Legalizing drugs? By liberals? Where?
Liberals favor criminals over justice? When?
Hinting that liberals have no ethics? Pardon?
This is a war? What is it with you conservatives and war.
I find you to be just another religious hypocrite, who uses religion to hold others accountable while your own actions are contrary to Jesus' teachings.
Taking a stand on abortion is a very serious issue and I will respect your stand. But you are obviously male.
Too few people, especially males, take your stand without ever BOTHERING to look at the bloody reality of what NOT have a choice has done to women and children throughout history.
Try reading The Hand-Maids Tale or the Cider House Rules to get even the most basest of idea about women and children and their second rate status in the world of men. See if you can hold on to your lofty opinion when you get a dose of reality.
But I doubt you will make such an effort. Judging the speck in your neighbors eye is far easier than removing the plank in your own. - Reply to this comment
- Re. Post by jmagarotz at 10:05 AM : Jun 28, 2007
--------
Suppose we leave the "last word" to the readers of our comments?
I am sure they have the intelligence to decide for themselves the difference between truth and rhetoric. - Reply to this comment
- "int he end, their campaign lacks substance and will eventually collapse.....especially when he gets indicted for tax evasion and campaign fraud." Posted by infidel_us
Well sure... he could be indicted for most anything... stealing a horse or *** a chicken. Just because the neo-cons are falling like dominos... I wouldn't Don't hold my breath... - Reply to this comment




