Comments on: White House Backs Cheney's Secrecy Stance
Bush Administration Defends VP's Decision Not To Cooperate With Archives
- You%u2019re a fraud and I do give a dam, you%u2019re spinning of this issues is disgusting and please stop contradicting yourself.
Posted by menofoz at 12:54 AM : Jun 24, 2007
There is no logic to your conclusion. How am I a fraud? I have never said anything fraudulent. I have never contradicted myself or my position. You have no basis to use the word fraud. So you are wrong. It is not fraudulent to say I hate Bush's guts, but that I agree with him on one issue. In fact it makes sense that out of all of the possible positions on all of the possible issues we are bound by the sheer law of averages to agree on some things. In fact I'd say it would be unheard of not to agree with another person on at least one thing, even if you disagree on just about everything else. Seems impossible to me. - Reply to this comment
- I personally don't care what Bush's private motivations are for supporting an amnesty for the undocumented workers already here. The fact that I support the same thing doesn't mean I have to support it for his reasons either. I support it because I honestly believe it's the most sane and humane answer to the fact that they're here and they're not going away. I have no idea why Bush supports amnesty and quite frankly I don't give a dam*n.
Posted by RandalDS
You%u2019re a fraud and I do give a dam, you%u2019re spinning of this issues is disgusting and please stop contradicting yourself. - Reply to this comment
- Suddenly acting as though the Bush Admin is somehow looking out for the best interest of the majority of Americans as if the policies, legislation, bills and amendments supported by this President were intended to benefit most Americans is laughable.
Posted by menofoz at 12:30 AM : Jun 24, 2007
I personally don't care what Bush's private motivations are for supporting an amnesty for the undocumented workers already here. The fact that I support the same thing doesn't mean I have to support it for his reasons either. I support it because I honestly believe it's the most sane and humane answer to the fact that they're here and they're not going away. I have no idea why Bush supports amnesty and quite frankly I don't give a dam*n. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by menofoz at 12:28 AM : Jun 24, 2007
It's fine to be against immigration. Many people are. However this is not the thread for that discussion. It is also ridiculuos though to say that because a person hates Bush's policies on just about everything that they are somehow required to hate his policy on absolutely everything. That's foolish and wrong. That's blindly following party or ideological loyalty over what you believe in your heart. I hate Bush on most of his policies, but you're full of sh*it if you think I'm a phony just because one of his policies happens to agree with mine. - Reply to this comment
- from continue
Oh did I mention privately the pentagon big wigs want a new influx of potential pawns for the next military adventure for other countries oil to assist international banking, world finance and global control for elitists. Nothing wrong with that, some group of men has to control the world but when things go wrong all *** going to break loose and world war 3 is going to kill over 200 million people. Doesn%u2019t that sound great? - Reply to this comment
- It's not about Bush, it's about what's best for the country.
Posted by realpatriot
In my opinion, you%u2019re both frauds and your phony positions pretending to oppose G.W. at just about every level. Suddenly acting as though the Bush Admin is somehow looking out for the best interest of the majority of Americans as if the policies, legislation, bills and amendments supported by this President were intended to benefit most Americans is laughable. Now here%u2019s the President leading the charge to allow over 20 million people who came into the United States illegally to become US citizens. Theirs nothing in the bill that%u2019s going to improve the poor conditions in Mexico which has caused so many immigrants to leave there own country illegally, to enter the USA. - Reply to this comment
Big business supports the Bush Admin illegal immigration reform bill, those working to build the new super highway from the border at Mexico/Texas to the border at Minnesota/Canada approve. Lobbyist for multinational corporations promotes the bill; politicians in the pockets of constructions companies and the service industry push this bill. The automobile industry wants this bill to pass. The only ones opposed to illegal immigration are the majority of working Americans.
How both of you can ignore the alarming negative effects on working Americans wages the increase in crime and costs to US taxpayers for health care, the closing of hospitals and many other terrible consequences attributed to this mass migration is stunning. However, in retrospect the fact you%u2019re both frauds can be the only logical explanation for what you both post.
continue- Reply to this comment
- It's not about Bush, it's about what's best for the country.
Posted by realpatriot1 at 11:16 PM : Jun 23, 2007
Thanks. It gets sort of old when some people think that just because you hold the same position as someone on one issue, that it automatically agree with everything that they say and hate everything those opposed to them says. For instance I refer to myself as a liberal because I agree with MOST of the liberal positions, but I for instance disagree with the need for more gun control, so some liberals get on me about that and some conservatives start to think I'm one of them. I look at each issue and how it fits into America and my life and I make my judgement on that basis. Not on what people say I should. I think that the biggest problem facing America today is that everyone THINKS they're supposed to all march in lockstep with their party or the political philosophy they most associate themselves with, instead of thinking for themselves more. - Reply to this comment
- This corruption does not stop at Libby, Gonzo, or even Cheney. The rampant corruption endemic in this Administration radiates from the top, down, through-out this Administration.
Dubya chooses corrupt individuals for top posts because he believes they will do things his way, in a corrupt fashion if necessary, in order that his corrupt policies are enacted, come hell or high water.
Their consensus is that they will deal with the consequences later in a corrupt manner if necessary, if the need arises. - Reply to this comment
- IOWEIGN,
It's no secret what changed in 2003 that would cause Cheney to stop complying with the law.
That's when The White House released classifeid information in order to out the CIA's anti-WMD
network in order to stick it to one of its agents-Valarie Plame.
No sense in complying with the law if doing so would provide evidence for your own prosecution. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




