Comments on: Similar Plotlines In Dem Debate Sequel
Vaughn Ververs: Tension Increased In New Hampshire Debate, But Story Remains The Same
- demonic-rats lead The Chorus of Useful Idiots
Leftist Support of Islamist Terror
Most shocking is the outright sympathy of many leftist-liberals for Islamic fascism. They said little about the murder of 500 Russian civilians, many of them children, but screamed week after week because some Arab savage at Abu Ghraib prison wore a bag on his head. They cared nothing about the beheadings committed by the Islamo-savages or the execution of 12 Nepalese. David Horowitz gives an excellent discussion of who this "Left" really is. He calls them neo-communist, I call them Leftist-Liberals. I'm a classical Liberal myself and I feel it's time to remove this irrational element that has been allowed to poison our good name.
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/list.htm
The Chorus of Useful Idiots
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/thornton.htm
Supporters of Muslim Terrorism on the un-Religious Left
http://www.sullivan-county.com/id2/index1.htm
Exposing Leftists' Radical Islam Connection
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/left_islam.htm
Definitions, Lies, and Losing Your Head
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/def_lies.htm
Shocking (Liberal) Silence
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/leftist_silence.htm
See no evil: Why the Left is blind to suffering
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/no_evil.htm
When is violent speech still free speech?
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/speech.htm - Reply to this comment
- Lars008 - not sure I get your point
Teddy Roosevelt was a great man and has some wonderful quotes
Sorry, though - He would not recognize the repub party of today
I'll bet you don't recall his quotes on conservation and protecting the environment, do you? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by stevepdx1 at 01:28 PM : Jun 04, 2007
Character is far more important than intellect in making a man a good citizen Theodore Roosevelt
In any moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing. Theodore Roosevelt
I would rather go out of politics feeling that I had done what was right than stay in with the approval of all men, knowing in my heart that I had acted as I ought not to. - Speech to the New York Assembly 1884 Theodore Roosevelt
Our country offers the most wonderful example of democratic government on a giant scale that the world has ever seen; and the peoples of the world are watching to see whether we succeed or fail.- Saratoga, New York September 27, 1910 Theodore Roosevelt
We believe in all our hearts in democracy; in the capacity of the people to govern themselves; and we are bound to succeed, for our success means not only our own triumph, but the triumph of the cause of the rights of the people throughout the world, and the uplifting of the banner of hope for all the nations of mankind. - Saratoga, New York September 27, 1910 Theodore Roosevelt
Avoid the base hypocrisy of condemning in one man what you pass over in silence when committed by another. - Cambridge, Massachusetts March 11, 1890 Theodore Roosevelt - Reply to this comment
- .......too fvck!n' funny....
Posted by veteran71 at 01:32 PM : Jun 04, 2007
Here's another one of those hallucinating dems hitting the crack pipe once too often. :) - Reply to this comment
- Having not seen the candidates that much, last night was my chance to form an opinion on some. Right off one thought came to mind; I can't see where all the hype about Obama comes from...unless last night he was medicated. Clinton was (as expected) totally gray...never black or white to her! She's one of those people who can't be wrong simply because she won't take a side. There was certainly not a winner to the debate...Biden should get acknowledged for being the most truthful and forthcoming of the lot. But, the American people are the true losers here if they are forced to choose a President out of the dismal group assembled to debate last night. I'm certainly going to hope I see something that I can believe in on Tuesday, because I refuse to believe that what I've seen so far is the best the people of the US can be offered.
- Reply to this comment
- "My vote will go to Fred Thompson - he's got character, courage, integrity - something that NONE of the Dems have. Sure would like Sam Waterston to be his running mate, though.
Posted by USA1881"
I have no problem with someone voting Repub if you can at least support your beliefs with thought and reason.
But voting for two actors - Thompson and Waterston - is completely idiodic
There should be an IQ test before they let people vote - Reply to this comment
- NOW CAN WE KILL THEM???
If they can kill us, we can kill them
Qaeda warns of attacks 'worse than 9/11'
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070530102648.wuwa6k96&show_article=1
Hizbullah Deputy Sec-Gen Sheikh Naim Qassem: We Have Jurisprudent Permission to Carry Out 'Martyrdom' Operations, Fire Missiles on Israeli Civilians From Ayatollah Khomeini
http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD154907
Switching Sides: Inside The Enemy Camp
But then in 2000, well before his arrest, something happened which would make Abas question everything he believed in: a fatwa, a religious edict, was issued by Osama bin Laden.
"It should be understood that killing Americans and Jews anywhere found are the highest act of worship and the highest form of good deeds in the eyes of Allah," Simon quotes bin Laden.
Abas and his fellow commanders were ordered to read the fatwa to their men and make sure they carried it out. The others obeyed, but Abas refused. It was his moment of truth. He firmly believed that jihad was to be fought only on the battlefield in defense of Islam; he had always been taught that the killing of civilians had nothing to do with holy war and that it was forbidden.
The fatwa justified killing non-Muslim civilians everywhere.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/04/60minutes/main2761108.shtml?source=RSSattr=60Minutes_2761108
American Al Qaeda Member Threatens Attack
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/29/terror/main2865282.shtml - Reply to this comment
- As long as oil companies can charge whatever they want for a gallon of gasoline.....
Posted by davidchery at 12:21 PM : Jun 04, 2007
Home grown terrorists and home grown communitsts - both equally distructive. . In case you're interested, Exxon makes about $0.08 (that's 8 cents) on a gallon of gas. How much do the FEDS MAKE?? 50-60 cent per gallon... and all the do is skim it off the top!
I suppose you believe that socialist Hillary when she says she wants to "TAKE" those profits and use them for funding alternative energy research? HA! - Reply to this comment
- We're gonna tax "the rich." Who are "the rich?" According to Muhamad Obama, it's people who earn over $250k/yr. That's ALL these losers know how to do.....take away from the producers and give it away to the slackers. Right out of the communist manifesto. Figures it's broadcast on the (C)ommunist (N)ews (N)etwork!
- Reply to this comment
- Why are democrats arguing about the war in Iraq? It's like republicans arguing about Social Security, or like men arguing about abortion. A waste of time, jibber-jabber, there is no answer. Hello! They didn't vote for the war. They voted to give the president the authority to make war. If they really wanted to, they could take it away. This is the Bush war, he's the decider, and he decided to take us into something we couldn't win. There is nothing to win. And health care? As long as oil companies can charge whatever they want for a gallon of gasoline, and doctors can charge whatever they want for an exam, they will fight a public system. Too much money involved, folks!
- Reply to this comment
- Whatever happened to the DEMOCRAT party concept of:
"Ask NOT what your party can do for you, but rather, what YOU can do for your country"
?????
Hillary sounds to me like she is plagarizing the "communist manifesto"
Hillary also sounds like Venezualan's communist president, Hugo Chavez, when she speaks of nationalizing the health industry and energy, too.
LET'S BRING BACK
"Ask NOT what your country can do for you, but rather, what YOU can do for your country"
... - Reply to this comment
- Whatever happened to the DEMOCRAT party concept of:
"Ask NOT what your party can do for you, but rather, what YOU can do for your country"
?????
Hillary sounds to me like she is plagarizing the "communist manifesto"
Hillary also sounds like Venezualan's communist president, Hugo Chavez, when she speaks of nationalizing the health industry and energy, too.
LET'S BRING BACK
"Ask NOT what your country can do for you, but rather, what YOU can do for your country"
... - Reply to this comment
- Go Obama!!! woot!
- Reply to this comment
- Dem or Rep, no candidate gets my vote except the one that votes against immigration reform and get tough at the border.
- Reply to this comment
- Dr. Ron Paul would very easily beat any of these democratic candidates.
- Reply to this comment
- Dr. Ron Paul would very easily beat any of these democratic candidates.
- Reply to this comment
- Ron Paul is the only candidate willing to say that we bring Muslim hatred on ourselves by meddling in the Middle East and failing to understand the cultures of the people there. Respecting Muslim nations is the only way to guarantee our security.
We respect Pakistan. We don't occupy Pakistan. We ask the Pakistani government to hand over terrorists, and they do. Pakistan has nukes. Iraq wanted to be treated like Pakistan. Iran wants to be treated like Pakistan. Iraq sought nukes. Iran is developing nukes. Does all this make sense to anyone? - Reply to this comment
Obama, with CBS%u2019s help, is deftly playing the typical political con-game with the vote for/against the Iraq invasion.
Obama%u2019s sole bona fides are his expounded, blown-out-of-proportion, speech at a democratic convention and the continued hero-image building by the MSN. Remember, the MSN is mostly corporate owned/controlled now.
%u201CHe reminding voters that he alone of the major candidates opposed the war from the very beginning.%u201D The natural conception of that by voters is to assume that he would have voted against it. But since Obama did not have access to the same information that the others did, and was not in a position to vote one way or the other, his claim is based solely on hindsight and is questionable at best. We have to accept his word that he would have voted against it.
Clinton refuses to admit she was wrong in voting for the invasion and even says we are safer because of it. I can%u2019t see any change in policy if she is president.
Edwards has said, repeatedly, that he was wrong and would have voted against it if he had it to do over. Once again this is hindsight, and he could be saying that just for campaign purposes. However, at this point in time, and given the choices, I would prefer Edwards as the democratic candidate.
But like many others posting here I would vote for any of the above over a continuance of a republican controlled administrative department (presidency).- Reply to this comment
- In most recent presidential elections, you could pretty much figure out in advace who the major party candidates were going to be. Not so this year, and to be honest, I'm not overly enthusiatic about any of them. I do know I not vote for any of the Republicans in the race, since just about all of them support the war in Iraq.
As far as the 'promises' they make on things like universial health care, or imigration, they seem to forget that a President is not a dictator, whatever they propose has to get past congress. Hillary of all people should know that. Look what happend to Bill Clintons health care proposals once the big money drug companies spent millions to defeat it! - Reply to this comment
- Nothing but the usual BS from the Democratic Candidates. I wish one of them really stood for something besides "opposing the war but supporting our troops". What a bunch of marlakey.
Hillary is still a cold, calculating NOTHING and Obama still carries water for Mr. Byrd.
My vote will go to Fred Thompson - he's got character, courage, integrity - something that NONE of the Dems have. Sure would like Sam Waterston to be his running mate, though. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




