Comments on: Clinton Emphasizes Shared Prosperity
Democratic Senator Denounces "On Your Own" Society; Touts "We're All In This Together" Model
Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
- If she wins in '08, your going to see one of the largest Government giveaways in history and guess what, she's going to be giving away your money!
- Reply to this comment
- They had "their hands on us" from 92 to 2000, the economy boomed.
Posted by sparks224 at 05:23 PM : May 29, 2007
And personal liberties and rights were eroded just as bad as the current administration. There is not a cup of warm spit difference between either party.
Gun bans, Brady Law, Giving control to the UN, placing American Soldiers under direct UN control, More spying on American Citizens,...etc, the list goes on. - Reply to this comment
- Confiscate from the hard working and give to the lazy. hmmm sounds like communism to me. It hasn't and never will work. The countries that have tried it go bankrupt because the hard working figures, why should I bust my hump so that money I earned is taken from me and given to someone who does nothing but birth or father illegitimate children. Look at communism and the liberal agenda, scarily similar.
- Reply to this comment
- North American Free Trade Agreement and WHO? Whoa, this sounds scary to me. Who is she kissing up to now? America is in perilous times. We've have got too many fires going....can't keep 'em all put out. This might just throw some gas on a few of them.
- Reply to this comment
- Your corporate masters don't want a fair market, they want a market that is free for them to make unfair. You fell for Reagan's stupid anecdotes. SUCKER.
- Reply to this comment
- to processor2
What happened? After decades of paying taxes, dying in private, for-profit wars that only benefit the rich and corrupt, giving our livelihoods away to "globalization" for increased profit margins, and otherwise "doing for our country", it is time now to ask, "why should I do for my country, when my country chooses to do nothing for me"... - Reply to this comment
- Mr. Clinton says some things that are necessary, some things that are not. All of you mudslingers and sycophants on these blog sites can debate their merits or shortcomings 'til the fat lady sings. My problem with the whole lot, (dems, repubs, indies, supreme court, etc) is that they are all liars, pandering to their core bases, but if elected (and/or appointed), the only promises remembered are the ones that make the already super rich even richer, and on a social level, encourage more social, economic, racial, and religious intolerance.
Reagan's "trickle-down" economics is a proven dismal failure, yet since then all the candidates from both sides offer up only slight variations on this failed economic theme. The neocons' knee-jerk free market drivel is just that, no one seems to notice that leaving essential services to the free market also facilitates corruption, racketeering, fraud, and other factors that actually reduce, or eliminate the effectiveness of said services. - Reply to this comment
- I think Sparks 224 needs a better legitmate reason to state why she should not get a vote other than hair!
Posted by jantesh
I was making fun of the anti-Hillary people. I was hoping you'd get it. - Reply to this comment
- Whatever happened to the DEMOCRAT party concept of:
"Ask NOT what your country can do for you, but rather what YOU can do for your country"
Sounds like Hillary is plagarizing "the communist manifesto"
... - Reply to this comment
- Whatever happened to the DEMOCRAT party concept of:
"Ask NOT what your country can do for you, but rather what YOU can do for your country"
Sounds like Hillary is plagarizing "the communist manifesto"
... - Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.
