Comments on: Clinton Pounces On "Mission Accomplished"
Democratic Candidate Calls President's 2003 Speech Blot On Leadership
- [ and YOU call THEM barbarians?]
Yes Iceman, they are primitive, barbaric, vulgar and beast-like zealots without conscience, plucking the eyes out of their wives, daughters, or other relatives for being seen by a man or raped. They cut tongues out using a pliers and a razor as easily as you or I would prepare a melon for breakfast. They keep birds in their homes to eat the flies. I saw a film of Saddam's men pushing victims off of a three story building as punishment for some kind of minor crime. They teach beheading techniques in their religious instruction. What a great bunch. Again, I say eliminate them all and end this jihad baloney. - Reply to this comment
- "...recommend we use the neutron bomb on the whole area..."
Give the Israelis a heads up first.
They might have a problem with this plan. - Reply to this comment
- "They have oil, and that has made these barbarians wealthy and powerful. I consider them a sub-human form of life and recommend we use the neutron bomb on the whole area. Let's eliminate them all and take the oil."
- Posted by drivelphobe at 10:32 AM : Apr 29, 2007
Wow... Genocide for fun and profit.
And YOU call THEM barbarians ? - Reply to this comment
- [... but our public (70%+) and our congress (both houses, both parties) were overwhelmingly sure Saddam was a threat with WMD (Other "allies" as well ... ]
was this before or after the aluminum tube/yellowcake stories? - Reply to this comment
- [the media is 90% left, outside FOX, name one MAJOR newspaper or TV outlet that isn't liberal, name ONE!!]
[Posted by fredgrad2000 at 10:33 AM : Apr 29, 2007]
washington times, wall street journal - Reply to this comment
- [Let's eliminate them all and take the oil.]
let's drill a deep well from the other side of the earth and drain their reserves ... that'll teach 'em - Reply to this comment
- grumpas - BILL MOYERS!? There's a reliable, un-biased source!! HAHAHAHA - the media is 90% left, outside FOX, name one MAJOR newspaper or TV outlet that isn't liberal, name ONE!! So, don't be blaming the GOP for the Democrats supporting the war in Iraq in 2002 - that's ***; read below - Iraq was a bad idea, but our public (70%+) and our congress (both houses, both parties) were overwhelmingly sure Saddam was a threat with WMD (Other "allies" as well, even the bought off ones like France) and supported taking him out. Hillary's quote is in an earlier post.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime . He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to iscalculation . And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
...So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real .."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 - Reply to this comment
- Bush is leading the war on terrorism. He's the man in charge. He relies on the most savvy political and military people in the world. The job is tough and everyone knew it going in. If you have ever been in a fight, you know you have to expect the unexpected and adjust. Fights don't go as planned. As I have said before, I don't think one more American life is worth the entire population of the Middle-east. They have oil, and that has made these barbarians wealthy and powerful. I consider them a sub-human form of life and recommend we use the neutron bomb on the whole area. Let's eliminate them all and take the oil.
- Reply to this comment
- I don't want to hear any presidential candidate, Republican or Democrat, bashing Bush. Bush will be out of office soon. I want to hear the candidates talk about what they would about the mess left them in Iraq. I want to hear them talk about their national health care plans. I want them to talk about they would do about illegal immigration. I want them to talk about what they would when the US gets hit with another 9/11 terrorist attack. But please, don't waste my time bashing Bush.
- Reply to this comment
- "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
AND DON'T TELL ME SHE DIDN'T HAVE THE SAME INTEL AS BUBBA'S WIFE!! BILL CLINTON BELIEVED THE SAME THINGS BUSH DID - HIS ACTION WERE JUST DIFFERENT IN RESPONSE (AND IN THE END, SMARTER)
Hillary is the most disingenuous candidate out there, only Edwards (oh and Romney now - he needs to drop out) come close to rivalling her capacity to change her views for whatever audience she's in front of. COMPLETELY untrustworthy...there are candidates out there, both sides of the aisle, that are in my mind actually honest - I may not agree with them all - but they sincerely appear to hold actual beliefs and stick to them - Obama, McCain come to mind, Biden, a couple of the lower-tier candidates as well on the GOP side. We need someone who isn't a flip-flopper for whatever audience they're in front of, and someone, either party, who can win in a landslide so as to at least SOMEWHAT re-unite our divided, angry nation - Hillary can NOT do that either! - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




