Comments on: Iraq Dominates Dems' Presidential Debate

8 Presidential Candidates Try To Distinguish Themselves In First Debate Of '08 Race

[wayfedup]

I DID admire his saltiness though... More B*ALLS than BUSH could ever DREAM about having!

[wayfedup]

Did anyone else think of Ross Perot when GRAVEL SPOKE?

[kansas1946]

Actually, out of the whole group, Hillary is probably the only one that I definately wouldn't vote for. The Democrats have a really good line up that is deep, the poor Republicans ain't got sh**. They don't even have anyone that is interesting.

[wayfedup]

If Hillary is elected, I will get to laugh and laugh, along with the Republicans, as they suddenly shift from their craven "blame Iraq" campaign, and move to lay the FULL BLAME for the Iraq catastrophe on the Democrats.

They will never see it coming.

I look forward to it!

Hopefully it will be a nice distraction from the unprovoked AEI/AIPAC induced war of agression against Iran, once she gets that underway.

Go Hill!
Posted by feelfree1 at 10:27 PM : Apr 26, 2007


Of course you're COMPLETELY DELUSIONAL, AS IS YOUR SAVIOR, BUSH!

[feelfree1]

I really hope that Hillary wins. Electing Hillary will lock in Democrat Party culpability, for the illegal war of aggression against Iraq, and lay bare that the Democrats are just a other brand of Corporate/AIPAC slavery.

If Hillary is elected, I will get to laugh and laugh, along with the Republicans, as they suddenly shift from their craven "blame Iraq" campaign, and move to lay the FULL BLAME for the Iraq catastrophe on the Democrats.

They will never see it coming.

I look forward to it!

Hopefully it will be a nice distraction from the unprovoked AEI/AIPAC induced war of agression against Iran, once she gets that underway.

Go Hill!

[radiob-2009]

All of them on both sides note where they give speeches and who they endorse and research those groups. Follow the money on both sides. No thanks.

[wayfedup]

With the choices that are available I am going to write in my dog.
Posted by radiob at 10:10 PM : Apr 26, 2007


Shave his A$$ and teach him to walk backwards, and he'd make a DANDY REPUBLICAN!!!

[radiob-2009]

With the choices that are available I am going to write in my dog.

[wayfedup]

I kinda like both. It'd be interesting to watch Obama and Clinton squirm on a P/VP ticket (who's P? Who's VP?), but in the end Edwards/Obama is pretty appealing.
Posted by pakaal at 10:08 PM : Apr 26, 2007

Agreed, its a WIN/WIN ticket either way.

[pakaal]

I like Edwards,or Obama, but I'll vote for Hillary if she's the nominee.
Posted by wayfedup at 10:04 PM : Apr 26, 2007

I kinda like both. It'd be interesting to watch Obama and Clinton squirm on a P/VP ticket (who's P? Who's VP?), but in the end Edwards/Obama is pretty appealing.

[feelfree1]

Correction:

My last paragraph should have read-

"While not as many national level Democrats deserve to face (PRISON) as compared to the members of the Bush regime, many still don%u2019t belong making decisions for the rest of us."

[radiob-2009]

When is a real candiate going to run? One that is not bought by the corporations any party and represents Americans?

[wayfedup]

Who's your pick?

You know, someone I wouldn't mind voting for but isn't running is Harry Reid. A real insider, but hey.
Posted by pakaal at 10:00 PM : Apr 26, 2007


I like Edwards,or Obama, but I'll vote for Hillary if she's the nominee.

[feelfree1]

The only candidate running with any credibility about the Iraq war is Congressman Dennis Kucinich, who was apparently not invited. Kucinich is the only candidate running who has opposed the Iraq debacle from the start, and has maintained a consistent resistance to the Bush League war of terror. He is the only Congressman who has filed Articles of Impeachment against ******** Cheney, which he did earlier this week.

If the Democrats need any advice on the Iraq war, they should seek guidance from Mr. Kucinich.

While Obama was allegedly opposed to the invasion of Iraq, he was not in office at that time, so he did not have the opportunity to vote on it. Obama does strike me as a bit more genuine than Clinton or Biden, but he has also publicly %u2018sworn his allegiance%u2019 to AIPAC/Israeli extremists, which disqualifies him from my list of possibilities.

If the Democrat Party wanted to offer the American people a respectable alternative to the Bush regime, Obama would represent the CONSERVATIVE element of the Party. I hope the Democrats join the Republican drift towards irrelevance, so that we might elect a few more non-Corporate/AIPAC concubines into leadership positions.

While not as many national level Democrats deserve to face as compared to the members of the Bush regime, many still don%u2019t belong making decisions for the rest of us.

It%u2019s time for some house cleaning!

[pakaal]

looks like he missed the debate... I guess he couldn't bear to see his NEXT President !
Posted by wayfedup

Who's your pick?

You know, someone I wouldn't mind voting for but isn't running is Harry Reid. A real insider, but hey.

[wayfedup]

Hmm, he comes to post his lack of knowledge on a comments board. Ohhkayyy....
Posted by pakaal at 09:55 PM : Apr 26, 2007


looks like he missed the debate... I guess he couldn't bear to see his NEXT President !

[pakaal]

I wonder what Hillary flip flopped on during this debate...
Posted by singinrick at 09:50 PM : Apr 26, 2007

Hmm, he comes to post his lack of knowledge on a comments board. Ohhkayyy....

[wayfedup]

Well, HELLO Singinprick! Long time, no miss!

[dirtydog55]

they are GREEDY FOOLS who ONLY care about their stock portfolios. Posted by wayfedup at 09:30 PM : Apr 26, 2007

You're right, wayfedup. Greed did play a big part. Greed and religious fanaticism--what a combo!

[feelfree1]

"Iraq Dominates Dems' Presidential Debate"

If that is the case, this must have been a real snoozer of a debate. I see 4 corporate/AIPAC slaves at the podium, 3 out of four which voted in FAVOR of giving surrendering their Constitutional right do decide in matters of war, over to the illegitimate puppet-Commander-in-Chimp.

Hillary was enthusiastically PRO-WAR as little as 6 MONTHS AGO, while campaigning for Senate seat, for furk sake!!! Edwards/Kerry 2004 ran on a platform of ADDING 40,000 MORE TROOPS to the fraud-based, catastrophic, disgraceful, and ILLEGAL war against Iraq, a a time when it was already clear that the invasion was a FAILURE and a crippling multi-front defeat!!! What a couple of JACKASSES!!!

Sen. John Edwards, Sen. Joe Biden, and Sen. Hilary Rodham Clinton, should all apologize for their abominable performance, resign, and take their place next to the Bush regime facing war-crimes tribunals, for their aid and comfort which they have so often given to the Bush regime terrorists.