Comments on: Bush And Democrats Near Iraq Showdown

President Demands That Congress Replenish War Funds With No Strings; Pelosi Tells Him To "Calm Down"

[formrusmcsgt]

notblue

Bush and Co. lost this war when they allowed the counrty to spiral into CIVIL WAR.

It's all over but the denying.
Posted by micma at 11:00 AM : Mar 29, 2007

We've been losing since March 20, 2003. The neocons just refuse to sdmit they stepped in it.

[formrusmcsgt]

Former, once again your cherry picking, Patreous aid there is no military solution ALONE, there is a difference when ALONE is included in your little fact.
Posted by notblue at 10:54 AM : Mar 29, 2007

The exact quote is:

"There is no military solution to a problem like that in Iraq".

He did continue to say "Military action is necessary to help improve security... but it is not sufficient. There needs to be a political aspect".

[micma-2009]

notblue

Bush and Co. lost this war when they allowed the counrty to spiral into CIVIL WAR.

It's all over but the denying.

[forthepeaple]

mimca- you have to remember, in the first place we had no buisness starting a war with irac, none whats so ever..

that why he and vp will be impeach for war crimes agaist this country.

[formrusmcsgt]

I would like to ask notblue, pwrslm, or anyone else who supports this boondoggle what they think Iraq is worth in terms of dead or maimed American warriors and American treasure. They obviously feel that it's worth more than the 3,200 dead, 25,000+ maimed and trillion dollars spent so far.

So, how much more? 10,000 dead? 50,000 maimed? 2 trillion dollars?

C'mon neocons, tell us what Iraq is really worth to you. I bet not one of you has the gonads to answer the question.

[micma-2009]

notblue

Now that Iraq is in a state of CIVIL WAR, who should we back?


Should we back the Pro-Sadam Sunni extremists that hate us?

or

Should continue to back the Pro-Iranian Shia extemists that hate us?

or

Maybe we should play referee in the middle while we get shot at and blown to hell?


Bush and Co. lost this war when they allowed the counrty to spiral into CIVIL WAR.

[notblue]

Former, once again your cherry picking, Patreous aid there is no military solution ALONE, there is a difference when ALONE is included in your little fact.

[forthepeaple]

sorry nyckate about the caps, i just get so angree knowing by brother and sister over in iraq are dieing for nothing...

[forthepeaple]

NYCKATE, HAVE YOU READ THE STORY AT THE LINK I POSTED, IF NOT GO AHEAD AND READ IT..ALL AMERICA SHOULD READ IT.

[micma-2009]

"Civil war is not started by elements from another nation."

pwrslm

Really? How about Where does this new definition come from? I've not found any such qualifiers. Is this another one from the vault?

What I actually said was, "All CIVIL WARS involve a minority of outside players trying to influence things."