Comments on: House Panel OKs Subpoenas For Bush Aides

Sets Up Potential Constitutional Showdown With White House

[wayfedup]

TREASONOUS DICTATOR, I MEANT.

[wayfedup]

GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

"I don't give a *******," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a ******* piece of paper!"


Any of you "BUSHIES" REALLY PROUD of this TREASONUS DICKTASTER?

[scott4261]

Thank you MissUT2, from another southern liberal!

[wayfedup]

Viva Bush!
Posted by badaxmofo at 09:07 PM : Mar 21, 2007


hey badaxhomoblojomofo, Your guy Bush is gonna be remembered as the WORST WORLD LEADER, FROM ANY COUNTRY ANYWHERE, EVER!! S*CREW HIM!

[missut2]

hey seven-pesos...I'm from the South, and proud of it. But you, sir, are an idiot! Re your little list:

1.John W Booth--Dead--How could you presume to know if he's Christian?
2.Jefferson Davis--Dead--See above
3.George Bush Jr--Sorry, he hails from South Haven CT, and lived in Texas--not the REAL South
4.Pat Robertson--VA is not really part of the Confederacy...
5.That's JIMMY Swaggart--
6.Grand Wizard of the KKK--are you applying for the position?
7.George Wallace--Dead--SOUTHERN DEMOCRAT, ran for Pres as an Independent.
8.Tammy FAYE Bakker--Sorry, she hails from International Fall Minnesota, now living in CA
9.Geo Wallace Jr--??
10.Jerry Falwell--You can have him.......

You are way off base in your comments re the Grand South. You don't like the South??? Then stay at home in your own little world. ...we don't plan to change our way of life for you or anyone else...with that said,
"Bless your little ole heart" - "Y'all come see us when you can" - "Help yourself to a tall glass of sweet tea"

Try to stay on topic...belittling the South and our way of life is one clear indication that you don't have anything intelligent to add to the subject at hand...Dubya and his bunch of liars and thieves...That should keep you busy for a while!

Proud to hail from Dixie!

[scott4261]

badaxmofo,

Were you dropped on your head as a child?

[realpatriot1]

You're so clever badaxmofo,derrr!

None of the prosecutors were investigating Bush, just his crook allies. That was enough to make them disloyal to him. After all, they don't take an oath to defend the Constitution, there in office to protect crooked politicans.

So what do you think that means...please explain,We can't read your warped mind.

[southgagal]

Not a poet, and I know it; but,
If it's truth that you'll tell,
then why in Hell,
Would you fail,
to take the oath,
when the words are spoken,
Have it recorded,
for all to accord;
Could it be that
What you really fear,
Is that when we all hear,
We all will know,
it was all for show;
it wasn't the nation's security,
that gave you concern,
but, it was
what would be the injury
to you
When you committed P-E-R-J-U-R-Y.

[seven-pesos]

they kicked that cheerleading, *******,piece of *****, bush, out of the north...

but bush found a home in the slave state south.

land of rednecks, white trash, phony christian idiots, twisted evangelist creeps, republican snakes...

bush's kind of people.

yep, they still love bush in the south.

phony christian, faith professing, war making, republican snakes.

i ***** on the south.

i wipe my azz on the confedererate flag.

nothing good comes out of the south!

[sshard]

I hope Congress gets their way and get White House official testify under oath. I just finished reading the DOJ documents that House put on their web site. Most it is routine, but there are some surprising things DOJ officials put into words. Stonewalling and misleading public officials is just one thing they chatted about.

Now if Congress really read these e-mails, not the way they did with the Patriot Act, they will have no trouble in finding the right questions to ask.

[pakaal]

Oh, your questions, right. As far as I know, none of the 8 fired by Bush in 2006 were investigating Bush, and none of the 93 fired by Clinton in '92 were investigating Clinton, and all hired were kept through his second term. You have different info?

Also, a simpler question. Do two wrongs make a right?

[xgi123]

Pak - so how many of the 8 fired are/were currently investigating Bush?
Posted by badaxmofo at 09:27 PM : Mar 21, 2007

What'r your point, jihadi?

[gkc99]

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A 16-day gap in e-mail records between the Justice Department and the White House concerning the firing of U.S. attorneys last year has attracted the attention of congressional investigators.

In an investigation into whether seven U.S. attorneys were fired for political rather than professional reasons, the Justice Department on Monday handed over 3,000 pages of documents to the House and Senate Judiciary committees.

But the documents included no correspondence about the firings in the critical time period between November 15, 2006, and December 2, 2006, right before the attorneys were asked for their resignations.



WooHoo--a 16 day gap, not an 18 minute gap.

Wait--doesn't every Bush-*** in neocondom think that lying under oath is grounds for impeachment--so impeach Gonzo now! Subpoena Dickless and make him lie (anything he says is presumptively a lie).

"You're doing a heck of a job, Bushit!"

[seven-pesos]

never a war the south couldn't lose.

what a bunch of bush loving, war making, phony christian, twisted evangelist, ignorant republican snake trash lives in the south.

yep, the south has lost every war they ever started...

bush's iraq war will be no different.

ha,ha,ha.

i ***** on the south.

i wipe my azz on the confederate flag.

bush loving christians suck my dong.

ha,ha,ha.

nothing good comes out of the south!

[wizest]

The cannons are loaded, primed and ready to fire!!
Who is ready to bend to the wind? Bush? Congress?
Not the Supreme Court, their backs so tight against the wall. if they tilt forward a little bit, they would be in the line of fire!!!

[realpatriot1]

Hillary in 08, we know that's not who you really are. Come on Karl, fess up, this is another of your dirty tricks. Very clever the way you spell Carl with a K, just like the other brownshirts.

You need to get some therapy to get out of the fantasy world you're living in if you think nothing is going to happen to these traitor pieces of ***. Obviously Bush doesn't agree with you, he's sweating so profusely that he just might get most of the alcohol out of his system and be able to speak English.

We+ don't need to jump off a bridge, we're the majority and I can tell how much that ticks you off!

Democrats never promised anyone's head on a platter but Bush did promise to bring integrity back to the White House. That was his first outrageous lie.

The Democrats have done more for the public in 60 days than the Republicans did in 12 years, so they have some free time. And it won't cost any more than a Tom Delay golf trip to Scotland. The Republicans delivered on none of the contract with America...so who got played? They let Osama get away....so who got played? They lied about WMD then destroyed the CIA's cover operations in Iraq, Iran, & North Korea(the Axis of Evil triple play)...so who got played?

Seven-pesos..what do you know about the south, you moron! We don't love him here in North Carolina, I can tell you that!

We hate the Confederate flag too. There is no red or blue, everywhere is pink. There are ********* like Hillary08 and mudrose everywhere.

[pakaal]

"The President%u2019s need for complete candor and objectivity from advisers calls for great deference from the courts. However, when the privilege depends solely on the broad, undifferentiated claim of public interest in the confidentiality of such conversations, a confrontation with other values arises. Absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic, or sensitive national security secrets, we find it difficult to accept the argument that even the very important interest in confidentiality of Presidential communications is significantly diminished by production of such material for in camera inspection with all the protection that a district court will be obliged to provide."

Supreme Court vs Nixon, July 1974 (Nixon was found guilty, in case you forget....)

And lest we forget, badax, these were Republican attorneys we "on the Left" are outraged about. Who's playing politics now?

[xgi123]

How many of those fired were/are actively/currently investigating Bush?

How many of those fired by Clinton were actively investigating Clinton?

Hence the difference between then and now!

!Viva Bush!
Posted by badaxmofo at 09:15 PM : Mar 21, 2007

Hey,,,jihadi, your on the wrong site!

[pakaal]

The ever-shrinking argument. First it's number of attorneys, then it's when they were fired, now it's why they were fired. And on it goes. How about this?

Of the 468 confirmations made by the Senate over the last 25 years, only 10 left office involuntarily for reasons other than a change in administration prior to the firings that took place in December.

In virtually all of those 10 previous cases, serious issues of personal or professional conduct appeared to be the driving issue. Prior to Bush's firings, only two U.S. Attorneys were outright fired for improper, and in one case criminal, behavior. Six other U.S. Attorneys who resigned during the 25-year period who were implicated in news reports of %u201Cquestionable conduct.%u201D

In other words, the Bush administration pushed out almost as many U.S. Attorneys in December as had been let go over the past 25 years.

[pakaal]

Ladies and gentlemen, j-whitman is in da house.

;-)