Comments on: Brownback Echoes Pace: Gay Acts Immoral
Presidential Contender Backs General's Remark About Homosexuality
- George, Alberto, Karl, and the rest can't wait to climb Brownback Mountain... What a bunch of deviants. Pace is probably one also, go watch the interview with Kay Griggs, I'm sure you can still find it online called Military Wife Tells All.... She tells how guys like Peter Pace really "work their way up the ranks" in the military.
- Reply to this comment
- anopinion1, do you care to hear how Clinton feels about lobbyists exceeding 30,000 in Washington overriding your vote in a manner that increasingly undermines your future participation in government? What is it with the small mindedness of individuals to think any of these people care one way or another about abortion, homosexuality etc. These are distractors to divide a populace and rob them of a government meant to represent all of its people. If you think your interests are what other people are doing in their own lives then you have serious boundary issues.
- Reply to this comment
- Moral? I know plenty of gay people who have morals which we should all aspire to. My question is this:
What is less of a moral act:
Senying someone their unalienable rights because they are gay
or
having *** with a willing partner of the same ***
What a backwards individual. - Reply to this comment
- Then there's Ted Haggard, George Bushs personal preacher.... spent every monday at the white house with his cheerleader buddy george bush.. maybe that's who he was getting the meth for....
Then you have George Bush making his flaming gay college cheerleading dorm mate ambassador to Poland, remember the last phony presidential debates where George "Lips" Bush kep bringing up Poland? He just couldn't take his mind off of his old gay lover..
Also there's a woman in Nevada who recently ran for office that claims she was involved in bisexual threesomes with Bush and Ashe and supplied other gay males for them.
GAYEST ADMINISTRATION EVER! - Reply to this comment
- They say these things yet they support that Gay male cheerleader named George Bush and his gay administration... Alberto Gonazales, Karl Rove, and many more. Bush was even busted for having a confirmed male prostitute (Jeff Gannon) posing as a fake reporter, secret service records show he spent the night at the white house over 200 times, and they even had this homosexual prostitute writing their "Anti gay" agenda.
Brownback and Pace won't say a word about that... I bet they probably have their own gay male prostitutes.... So either condemn the cheerleader in chief too or STFUP... - Reply to this comment
- There is an urgency to rally the ignorant base still necessary but to a lesser degree in this century. Someday we won't have to listen to a debate on these issues that fail to honor a separation of church and state.
Instead there will be totalitarian rule that will think and decide all issues for the people. There will be no need for concern, just follow the rules and work the fields like good little peasants. It will be utopia for the lemmings who are stressed to face these issues rushing to the polls on behalf of pastors like Ted Haggard to insure america's moral compass is calibrated. - Reply to this comment
- Clinton told ABC News Wednesday that it's for "others to conclude" whether homosexuality is immoral. On Thursday, she put out a statement saying that she'd heard from gay friends who said her answer sounded evasive.
that was in the article
What the heck is this "it's for others to decide" ***. This is a issue in the election to me.
I would like to know exactly where these people stand on issues like this. They will run into them while in office, and if it comes to a vote I want to know where they stand. I don't want someone in office that will sway where the wind blows on issues they should have definate view on. - Reply to this comment
- How can he say being a homosexual is not immoral, but homosexual acts are? In order to be a homosexual you have to perform homosexual acts. I will agree though, when a gay man first comes out he may or may not have ever had relations with another man, but I don't know of any homosexuals who have never engaged in sexual intercourse with another man.
This guy's statement just doesn't make too much sense. - Reply to this comment
- Strange how the neocon goosesteppers think that inflicting pleasure on someone is more immoral than inflicting pain on them. Is Brownback a sado-***?
- Reply to this comment
- global_chick...are you a chick from Iraq because you don't sound western wordly. Many readers might be curious. Is there anything inherently immoral about you or are you pure as the driven snow and the apple of God's eye?
- Reply to this comment
- Rev. Ted Haggard agrees with them too.
- Reply to this comment
- ---"He's a Republican presidential candidate, of course he's going to say that homosexuality is immoral, that's one of the pillars of the conservative agenda. If he didn't say that he wouldn't get conservative votes. Look at Mit and Guliani, they both switched thier "views" on abortion and *** as soon as they decided to run for office.--"
Notice that these issues never really get addressed once in office. Multinational corporate interests sure advance rapidly. The suckers, who vote for these snakes based on these issues are leaving their children and future generations destined to toil for bread crumbs the fields of private wealth no complaints tolerated.
Someday these politicians won't run on these "moral issues" they won't need the citizens vote. They'll be appointed by huge consolidations of wealth that managed to buy this and other countries. - Reply to this comment
- I agree with Pace and Brownback. Homosexuality is immoral, and as Americans they have every right to express their opinions without apology to anyone.
- Reply to this comment
- Yeah, but it's o.k. for multinational corporations to run in a state of anarchy giving sociopaths free reign. Corporate idolatry over american citizens, that's not a sin? Hey, if it works for Brownose, it's moral.
- Reply to this comment
- ""I do not believe being a homosexual is immoral, but I do believe homosexual acts are."
Is that like "I smoked marijuana, but I didn't inhale"?
Posted by oleander8 at 11:17 AM : Mar 16, 2007"
I think it means that he just likes to watch but not participate..... - Reply to this comment
- He's a Republican presidential candidate, of course he's going to say that homosexuality is immoral, that's one of the pillars of the conservative agenda. If he didn't say that he wouldn't get conservative votes. Look at Mit and Guliani, they both switched thier "views" on abortion and *** as soon as they decided to run for office.
If the conservatives made it a primary tenant of their agenda that people who wear orange are immoral, Brownback and Guiliani and Mit and all the rest would come out as "staunch anti-orange candidates". - Reply to this comment
- If the US Military refuses to have open gay service personnel in their ranks, then the US Military troops ought not be shoulder to shoulder with our allies that welcome gay soldiers, but then that would be virtually all of US' allies.
- Reply to this comment
- "I do not believe being a homosexual is immoral, but I do believe homosexual acts are."
Is that like "I smoked marijuana, but I didn't inhale"? - Reply to this comment
- Well Sam, you can just forget about coming to the Cheney family Christmas party!
- Reply to this comment
- No surprise here. Brownback is the furthest to the right socially of the GOP candidates. I'm not making any comment as to whether that will help or hurt him in the nomination process. Just stating it.
- Reply to this comment




