Comments on: Fox News Boss Hits Edwards' Boycott

Roger Ailes Criticizes Presidential Hopeful's Decision To Skip Debate Co-Hosted By Fox News

[kaliveotin]

Fox is bad, really bad, but even CBS has a corporate, Pro-republican bias. Look at the top six "political" stories offered by CBS online. Five pro-republican stories and one about a Madamn in D.C. The Democrats should boycot any FOX event that presents itself as unbiased. O'reilly can lie on his own show, but all political debates in america should be sponsored by unbiased, non-corporate, non-political organizations. Such as the league of woman voters, or the veterans of foriegn wars. Not a national propaganda organisation such as FOX news or MSNBC.

[scottroyer1]

It never fails. When liberals cannot win an argument (see FoxNews rating vs others) They go into attack mode and attemp to discredit the voices of dissent that oppose them.

FoxNews has a conservative editorial board .. no doubt. But it is no more conservative than the 3 networks are liberal. The difference is that the libs are in full panic that they have lost their 100% control over the media.

Get over it, and get used to it. Conservatives took your BS slanted news coverage for at least 40 years and we are not about to go back to being your sheep.

[clemenhagen1]

POST BY NTGLPRIMATE: clemenhagen1 "If you don't think that al qaeda is in Iraq now and actively pursuing the demise of American interests then I truly feel sorry for you...They would like nothing better than for you Murtha liberals to pull out of Iraq so they can take control of that country"

Talking-point ignorance, front and center, by our boy primate! Sure al Qaeda has taken advantage of the chaos of this ill-advised invasion to take a few shots at the U.S. They have also taken advantage of the distraction to regroup in Afghanistan, along with a resurgent Taliban. But what utter and sheer lunacy to suggest that "al Qaeda would take over Iraq" if we redeployed our troops. Study just a little bit about the country and region before making such absurd statements, Primate. First of all, the Kurds and Shiites HATE al Qaeda. They will not tolerate an al Qaeda presence in their regions. The Sunni insurgency consists primarily of former elements of the Baathist Party, and the Baathists were secular. That's why there was no connection between Iraq and al Qaeda: Saddam and the Baathists distrusted the fundamentalist al Qaeda types! Your comment reveals the level of ignorance that makes any reasonable or rational conversation about this war impossible. On the bright side, you do make the Bush administrations bumper sticker - slogan approach to world problems possible. So you got that going for you.

[ihave4rugratshelp]

And the fact that Bush and Libby have abosultely NOTHING to do with this article means nothing correct?

[ihave4rugratshelp]

But would you actually know a "real Republican" if they came up and bit you? Based on the comments made by RandalDS and DefndLiberty--I wonder.

[ihave4rugratshelp]

It would be nice if those posting on here would try to utilize a DICTIONARY before calling each other the following: FACIST, COMMUNIST and NAZI. Also, an actual working knowlege of US and world history would be a plus. Proving one's intellectual superiority by resorting to stereotyping and name calling is plain pathetic. And we wonder why the Dems and Reps can't play together? Is it because each group is capable of showing their intolerence and idoiocracy? Anyway, back to the news article--if Edwards allows his debate forums to be dictated by MoveOn.org, that speaks volumns about the kind of Presidency he would be offering the country--spineless and cowardly. Not every world leader or conflict faced by the President would be of the "nice" nature--if Edwards can't debate on a network MoveOn.org thinks is just way too "Republican" for them, then what would Johnny do as President? Withdrawl everytime he didn't like the challenge? Things the Democratic voter may want to think about before throwing their support and/or vote towards Edwards. Not a problem I have--I'll be voting Republican this time--oh, and btw, I am able to add two and two and speak and write in complete sentances--an accomplishment that many members of the Dem party accuse us of not being capable of--and I hate NASCAR and I live in the South. I love being stereotyped by psuedo-intellectuals--it just makes my day!!

[randalds]

Time to go to sleep I think. At my age I need my rest and besides it's exhausting work serving my communist masters, corrupting Americas youth, spreading atheistic filth and trying to destroy democracy as we know it by fighting the Bush regime (how dare I!!!).

[randalds]

"They're a cancer that needs to be cut out "for the good of the children."

-----------------------

That sounds like something that Castro or Chavez would say. Is it your intent to silence all who have a different opinion than you?

Is the neo-commie title I bestowed on you then accurate?


Posted by Jebby_One at 01:19 AM : Mar 10, 2007

You support cancer? That's a new one on me. It's my intent to stop the criminals on the right. They're the cancer I speak of and twisting my words doesn't change that. Why do you have a problem with stopping crime?

Are you sure you're not singingrick, he slips around like a snake (or worse a used car salesman) too.

[randalds]

You neo-commies seem more interested in hurting Republicans than in facilitating a one America.

If you destroy everyone who disagrees with you than what's the use of a democratic government where everyone has a voice?
Posted by Jebby_One at 01:14 AM : Mar 10, 2007

Again, liberal yes, but not a commie. Write that down so you don't forget. That said you, like most republicans, phrase things the same way as that old prosecutors question "Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Answer yes or no!". TRhere ios no yes or no answer and you know it. It's not a question of getting rid of people how disagree with us, it's a matter of getting rid of the corrupt criminals in the republican party and yes even in the democratic one. Besides there are no republicans left in Washington or at least very very few. There are neocons who call themselves republicans or conservatives, but their actions show them to be nothing more then thieve is republican clothing. I've always maintained the the people who should be the most pis*sed at the as*sholes in the White House should be the real republicans. After all it's your party they hijacked, not mine. You're the ones they ripped off worst of all.

[jebby_one]

"They're a cancer that needs to be cut out "for the good of the children."

-----------------------

That sounds like something that Castro or Chavez would say. Is it your intent to silence all who have a different opinion than you?

Is the neo-commie title I bestowed on you then accurate?