Comments on: Senate Foes Of Bush Iraq Plan Team Up

Senators Warner, Levin Agree On Joint Resolution Criticizing Troop Buildup

[bluestardad]

It is common knowledge that these Iraqi units are infiltrated by all types of Insurgents, Terrorist, and Execution Death Squads members of Both Religions. Those people who support this Surge of Troops in Iraq are forcing American Soldiers to sleep with the enemy in small units exposing them to undue kidnap threat. Americans soldiers who are captured by these enemies are without mercy, tortured and mutilated beyond recognition by their captors. Still our political leadership are planning to send these Brave Men and Women in to this environment. If American proceeds with this deployment and breaks down small American Units to live and work with these Iraqi Death Squad Units our troops will be kidnapped and handed over to such beheadings, torture and captivity as has never been seen before on Cable, Internet, and National Television. If you support this surge in troops and the tactics it brings you are responsible for every one of these deaths. Here is the contact address for your Senator! Send them a message of your opinion. All Class Two Senators are up for Reelection in 2008. http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_in
formation/senators_cfm.cfm

[karlimhof]

is this real or am i imagining it ?

our troops are being killed and the senate is trying to find the right wording of some "resolution" that will spare republican sensitivities about BUSHES IRAK WAR FAILURE.

[coffeehead-2009]

Forget iraq-

kill the samolians -
crush the koreans
slaughter the cubans - steal the land
rough up the afghanistans
and while you are distracted with all that HATE

we'll slaughter the iranians and get that oil!!
now line up for that chip and bring those kids down to the "STATE" for those "injections" -



*TODAY - on "selected" media outlets ..
at least until they are pulled like the protest coverage ;)

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Citing Iranian involvement with Iraqi militias and Tehran%u2019s nuclear ambitions, the Bush administration has shifted to offense in its confrontation with Iran %u2014 building up the U.S. military in the Persian Gulf and promising more aggressive moves against Iranian operatives in Iraq and Lebanon.

The behind-the-scenes struggle between the two nations could explode into open warfare over a single misstep, analysts and U.S. military officials warn.

[mikekleber]

When will Bush accept the fact that Iraq is a total disaster, and no matter how much money or soldiers you throw at it, it is never going to get better. Bush always says that he is a religious person. He should read the serenity prayer, and think long and hard about the meaning: "God grant me the serenity to accept the thing I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference."

[bildooreilly]

I don't believe in the lesser evil thing first state, they're all the same con men. It's obvious once you know their gang signs.

[bildooreilly]

If the Israelis attack Iran it will be because our "leaders" told them to. They don't refer to it the STATE of israel for nothing. Notice you never hear them referring to it as the nation of israel or the country of isreal, it's always the STATE OF ISRAEL.

BTW, this is what Israel stands for..

ISIS - Egyptian Goddess, the original mary.
RA - Comes from the word Amen Ra Egyptian sun god, "AMEN"
EL - Lord in hebrew.

It's all about their secret mystery religion that really runs this world. As practiced by people like Aleister Crowley, Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Marx, Napolean, just to name a few... and also almost all of the democrats and the republicans. When an occultist like Bush starts talking about "Americans needing to make some SACRIFICES" you fools better wake up and take notice.... after all holocaust in hebrew means "burnt offering" who was hitler making his burnt offering to?

W is not really a Double U, it's a double V... V in hebrew = 6.. VV = 66, the number of the "GREAT WORK" of the cabbalist, this is why we make a big deal about Route 66, and why we used to have Phillips 66... Hitler took it a step further with his VW and the VW logo... and now we got W...

I highly suggest you do a little research into the occult if you want a better understanding of this world we live in.

[firststate]

in my last post, slong the way should have been along, my keyboard's spelling could improve and I guess I could remember to spell check.

[firststate]

bildooreilly
I understand your feelings. Your vote is your choice and I can understand using it to make a statement. I also hope that the message is heard slong the way. I however, am less idealistic than in my college years. Strictly from a practical point of view, I choose the lesser of the evils, as I think most voters probably do, rather than make a valid statement and, in so doing, possibly insure the greater of the evils is elected. As I said, that's just the pragmatism of my years winning out over the idealism of my youth. Your position works for you and that is all that's necessary, as long as you bother to vote. Those who don't vote decide that their opinion isn't worth expressing at the polls, as far as I'm concerned its value hasn't increased since they decided it was worthless.
Have you noticed that shrub's speachwriters are cutting and pasting his speeches. His rumblings about Iran are nearly word-for-word replays of his Iraq rumblings from 4 years ago. In some sentences a couple of words are juggled but the only real differences are changing the "Q" from Iraq to the "N" in Iran. Given his torture of the language the words moved around in some sentences might just be the result of his getting it wrong, getting something wrong besides the war, I mean.

[feelfree1]

bildooreilly,

Re: "It's a joke feelfree1... nothing but a smokescreen to make it look like the dems tried to do something after they got elected when they're the exact same thing as the republicans. They voted for this war everytime, they voted for bushs patriot act twice, they supported almost everything the chimp has done the last 6 years. You people that voted for these *** are just as stupid as the people who voted for bush."

Hard to argue with any of that.

I have a feeling that while the Democrats are dinking around with this red-herring, the 'dumb as a stump' Israelis will attack Iran, and "both" of our "major" parties will have no choice but to rush to the aid of the Israelis.

What do you think?

[bildooreilly]

It's a joke feelfree1... nothing but a smokescreen to make it look like the dems tried to do something after they got elected when they're the exact same thing as the republicans. They voted for this war everytime, they voted for bushs patriot act twice, they supported almost everything the chimp has done the last 6 years. You people that voted for these *** are just as stupid as the people who voted for bush.

[feelfree1]

re: "Two senators leading separate efforts to put Congress on record against President Bush's troop buildup in Iraq joined forces Wednesday, agreeing on a nonbinding resolution that would criticize the plan."

Whew! They are really determined to hurt the feelings of the Bush eunuch! I'm sure that he will feel sad, if this passes!

[bildooreilly]

first state, just because all your two party candidates who are really all on the same team suck you guys go and blame it on 3rd parties... well if your candidates weren't so crappy and corrupt in the first place we wouldn't have to go vote for 3rd parties now would we...

[bildooreilly]

Well first state, I'll be voting 3rd party, and I don't consider an israeli shill like Joe Lieberman an independent... My concious is clear, I didn't vote for any of these ***, why should I? None of them represent me or anything I agree with... If the dems and pukes are for it, I'm definitely against it. If you want to keep voting for these corrupt *** then you go right ahead but don't be telling me I caused your worthless party to lose... they're all losers.

[firststate]

bildooreilly
You aren't wrong, both parties are often useless, but the reality is that in terms of Federal offices, a vote for a third party can be either useless or worse and cause the election of the worse of the 2 major options. Third and even fourth or fifth parties are a great idea, but unless and until they can build organizations from the state legislatures up, they will continue to be marginalized. As it stands, even the "independent" can be one of the 2 party insiders who chooses the independent label after their party fails to choose them a la Lieberman, (I) Connecticut. It sucks, the deck is stacked, but that is reality. Change won't happen overnight, but it needs to happen.

[bildooreilly]

These losers in both lame a ss parties all should just go on vacation with their cheerleader leader for the rest of the year instead of wasting our money playing their big lets pretend game.

[bildooreilly]

Why are they wasting our money and our time on a "non binding resolution" when they could be putting an end to this *** with a real binding resolution...fvckin worthless crooks.. both parties too... nothing but worthless fvckin a ssholes...

[firststate]

How is it possible that there is any difficulty getting more than 60 U.S. Senators to recognize that the decider hasn't been making wise decisions. Saying we should look forward, not back is a tacit admission that looking back will show how bad those decisions have been. After correctly stating that our military would hand the Iraqi's a$$es to them in the initial invasion, the decision making went all to he11. Even that portion was flawed because we didn't have enough troops to maintain order, especially after disbanding their police and army. The military leadership's usefulness has become limited to presidential photo opportunities. He's the decider and has consistently made poor decisions.

The men and women of our military deserve a level of competence equal to theirs in the decision making area. These men and women are giving their best, and too many are giving their all to dare ask them to keep executing a failed strategy.

It shouldn't be difficult to find 60+ Senators who are willing to say to our military that they will get as good as they give. Quality performance in the field deserves quality decision making. If we can't find 60 Senators willing to put their nation before their party, we need at least 40 NEW SENATORS.

[bildooreilly]

It's all just smoke and mirrors... the democrats were elected to stop this war and now they're calling for bush to end it by march 2008... What a bunch of worthless ***. You two party morons that voted for all these crooks in both parties should feel like a real sucker about now because you are... I knew this would happen.

[bildooreilly]

Who cares about their bogus "non binding resolution" it's just a smoke screen to make it look like these corrupt jackasses are actually trying to do something when they're actually not doing *** about it.

[cantshutup]

THE DRAFT IS HERE. Universal Nat'l Service Act of 2007.


NOT TO ALARM YOU OR ANYTHING. Just passing this along.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.393:

Universal National Service Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)

HR 393 IH

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 393

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the favorable treatment afforded combat pay under the earned income tax credit, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 10, 2007