Comments on: No "Do-Over" For Hillary On Iraq

Senator Clinton Campaigns For The White House In Iowa

Add a Comment See all 54 Comments
by rharrin1 January 28, 2007 4:58 AM EST
Sharncedar

She did not say she would deck americans you moron you get confused real easy must be related to bush huh?
Reply to this comment
by thomderr January 28, 2007 4:03 AM EST
And I'm just asking.

Wasn't Hillary president once before?

Not in name, and no insult intended to the former First Lady, but I always thought that SHE was the driving force behind Bill Clinton!
Reply to this comment
by bellal-2009 January 28, 2007 3:37 AM EST
Well, there is only one 2008 candidate on either side of the aisle who satisfies those criterion. And that's WES CLARK. Posted by nocore at 06:24 PM : Jan 27, 2007

Whoa, an "I should have had a V8 moment". I forgot about Wesley Clark. Is he running?
Reply to this comment
by j0hnwi11iams January 28, 2007 3:17 AM EST
The republicans are 100% tactical. They don't want to raise minimum wage? Sink the bill with 74 amendments. Disgusting.

Everywhere the minimum wage has been raised, the economy has improved. That is because money is going into the hands of people who will improve their lives and become more productive.

Of course the republicans see everything polarized: themselves vs. the wage slaves.
Reply to this comment
by j0hnwi11iams January 28, 2007 3:12 AM EST
To the freeper leveling the tired old accusations at Hillary, she is much more the man than you ever were. $60 million on Ken Starr running very public investigations on allegations and all you have to show for it is the guy lied about ***.

You disgust me.
Reply to this comment
by gdmoore2 January 28, 2007 3:11 AM EST
exusmcsgt - Thanks for the clarification and your opinion. I thought I picked up on something different. At least, I had not encountered it before.

Is there a site on the web that represents or sets out your views?
Reply to this comment
by j0hnwi11iams January 28, 2007 3:09 AM EST
I am at the point where I vote a straight Democratic ticket. They could have Johnny Knoxville running and I would vote for him over a Republican.

Personally I'm hoping Al Gore runs.
Reply to this comment
by January 28, 2007 2:55 AM EST
Edwards has much more appeal than Hillary and I plan to support him. Hillary's voting record on several key issues turned me off...however, if she gets the nomination, I will vote for her. I like her fighting spirit. It is hoped, however, that Democrats will select a candidate who doesn't have the negative factor of being a woman who carries all the baggage of her White House years. Will America put in a woman? Gaining the presidency is simply too important to take a chance at this time.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 28, 2007 2:48 AM EST
hillaryin08-

Not that I'm one to defend Hillary, but to what do you refer with "both sides of the isle"?

Do you refer to the fact that she and many other Senators voted to give Bush the go ahead based on doctored intelligence designed to produce just such a result?

And now that the truth is out, that she and several other Senators hold a different view?
Reply to this comment
by hillaryin08 January 28, 2007 2:12 AM EST
Yes......I will play both sides of the isle and get their votes.

Exxxxxxxceleeeeeeeennnnnt.

Now you will witness the full power of the dark side of the force!
Reply to this comment
See all 54 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: