Comments on: Retired Generals Slam Bush's Iraq Plan

Troop Buildup Called "A Fool's Errand" By Commander In First Gulf War

Add a Comment See all 214 Comments
by feelfree1 January 19, 2007 4:40 AM EST
Must read analysis!!!

"Bush is winning in Iraq"

http://mwcnews.net/content/view/11861/2/
Reply to this comment
by defirststate January 19, 2007 4:32 AM EST
Not only generals, but general's who don't have to say what the gijoe-in-chief wants to hear of retire unexpectedly. If the poster who thought these were Vietnam era generals read the article they would know better. I guess a short attention span is almost a defense mechanism for a bushie.

The only people who agree with the shrub surge ar his playmates in the white house and people who depend upon him for their continued employment. As it turns out, many of these aren't even true neo-converts. They just don't express contrary opinions for attribution. I prayed for his mental health. Instead of getting rid of his sociopathy, only his paranoia was improved. Now people really are out to get him, at least to the extent of some sort of intervention to get him to face the fact that he has gotten so many things FUBAR!
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 19, 2007 4:30 AM EST
Good night, I'm outta here
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 19, 2007 4:21 AM EST
inventagod,,, Looks like the Bushies have cut & run again.. Not surprising, kinda surprised they even showed up.. Especially after Maliki said Bush & Rice where embolding the enemy.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 19, 2007 3:54 AM EST
inventagod,,, The generals, what do they know about the military?? That's what republicans will be saying next.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod January 19, 2007 3:50 AM EST
The generals?

That leaves only the neocons to support those right-wing hawk traitors. Impeachment may be too good for this administration, who have lied about everything, bled the treasury dry, killed thousands of innocents, burned our constitution and led us into pointless wars for oil.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 19, 2007 3:49 AM EST
annd,, If it's his military service of 38 years, Im my 20 years of service, I never ran into a sole with 38 years of active duty & I retired 20 years ago... Maximim is 30 years, then you have to retire.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 19, 2007 3:36 AM EST
annd,,, You're going to answer for me ?? I don't thinks so,, What's your question?
Reply to this comment
by annd2302 January 19, 2007 3:31 AM EST
Posted by j-whitman at 09:10 PM : Jan 18, 2007


E ran into another one who called himself "Ourtomorrow", he said he had 38 years in the militay & 20 years civil service... LOL

And your point, let me answer
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 January 19, 2007 3:30 AM EST
emhawks,

Good suggestion.

After they are removed from office, they will be available to face war-crimes proceedings.
Reply to this comment
See all 214 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: