Comments on: Bush 'Not Satisfied' With Iraq Progress
President Tells Key Shiite Leader That More Needs To Be Done To Stop Sectarian Violence
- Bush has big smiles on his face as Al-Hakim, whom the U.S. government's own intelligence sources have linked to death squads, was being praised by Bush! Bush is friends with the ones who want to destroy us!
- Reply to this comment
- Al-Hakim is gonna do the ARM-JOB as long as the Iranian masters counter-part agree on the said JOB. Iran providing the men and the martyrs and Walking-Liar providing the Tools. Nice team-work. This is the walking-liar's way of liberating the Iraqi population.
- Reply to this comment
- Wasn't it better to shake Saddam's hands then this RADICAL ISLAMIST's hand whose purpose of life is to kill infidels.I bet Bush&Co. don't know very basics of how these RADICAL ISLAMIST SHIA will keep on taking our tax payed money and our weapons to kill our soldiers in Iraq and to supply those weapons to their RADICAL HEZBOLLAH brothers in LEBANON.I feel so frustrated when I see how stupid people in our govt are how our country is going towards hell hole because of lack of knowlege and undersatnding of these RADICAL MUSLIMS and to start a war in a way which only benifits RADICAL ISLAM AND RADICAL MUSLIMS.
I bet these NON-SENSE CHRISTIAN RADICALS who have started a war in a way which only help their RADICAL MUSLIM BROTHERS in achieving their ultimate goal of forming an ISLAMIC EMPIRE by our tax money and weapons,don't even know that the SHIA ISLAM is based on a concept called TUQIYYAH which means telling lies to the infidels or to keep INFIDELS in darkness by showing a friendly face but to stab at the back is one of the most rewarding action in SHIA ISLAM.Our terrorism experts waste their time in researching about how SHIA and SUNNI sects were fromed 1400 years ago but they are not taught about concept like TUQIYYAH which makes a big difference in how the fight against a SHIA RADICAL should be different in the way we should fight against a SUNNI RADICAL. - Reply to this comment
- This is a very odd scene with Bush! Al-Hakim, whom the U.S. government's own intelligence sources have linked to death squads, was being praised by the U.S. president.
- Reply to this comment
- 'We talked about the need to give the government Iraq more capability as soon as possible so the elected government of Iraq can do that which the Iraqi people want to secure their country from extremists and murderers'
Walking-liar forgot to mention the LIARS as well. - Reply to this comment
- Wouldn't the walking liar be shaking a hoof if it were truly the devil?
- Reply to this comment
- whose hand is Walking-liar shaking? It's all confusing... whose hand is this leader shaking?, the devil's?
- Reply to this comment
- Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.
- Reply to this comment
- "Danes acquitted over Iraq secrets"
Denmark, what a country!
Now, that's national media and court of "public interest" worthy of their names.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6206848.stm - Reply to this comment
- Lord Bush is a FASCIST.
I'm not even sure he's human. If he is, I think he was born without a soul. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




