Comments on: Bush 'Not Satisfied' With Iraq Progress

President Tells Key Shiite Leader That More Needs To Be Done To Stop Sectarian Violence

[patriotic9]

sandycat2
You have a right to claim my comments as BS but you should prove your points with reasons like I did.I hope you will do that.I wish you all the best.

[sandycat2]

Patiotic, Bush has always been a moderate. What rock have you been under? Do you really believe all that BS you are spouting?

[patriotic9]

superchez1
"Leave the muslim animals alone to slaughter themselves"
You are absolutely right.But what should we do with the EXTREMIST CHRISTIAN ANIMALS who SEXUALLY MOLEST and SODOMIZE our YOUNG LITTLE AMERICAN BOYS in those CHURCHES where they frist preach against the evils of HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVOIR then tear the ANAL SPHINCTERS of those INNOCENT AMERICAN BOYS.What should we do with the REPUBLICANS like FOLEY who SEXUALLY harasses AMERICAN boys.What should we do with the people like BILL O'RIELLY who preaches people about MORAL VALUES and then SEXUALLY HARASS a female at work and then gives her ten million dollars to keep her mouth shut.We can't leave these EXTREMIST WILD CHRISTIAN ANIMALS alone because the people who suffer by their hands are our entire nation.If we leave them alone they will keep on doing what they doing and if we give them the chance to participate in POLITICS,they screw up the whole country on the name of SECOND COMING OF CHRIST.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.

[themooniac]

Bushrocks troll alert.

[patriotic9]

sandycat2
You are right.Now Bush is a moderate after realizing the falsehood of the RADICAL CHRISTIANITY when he lost the IRAQ WAR which instead of bringing CHRIST back in the world made ISLAMIC RADICAL POWERFULL and SUCCESSFUL in their plans.Now BUSH doesn't refer to GOD or BIBLE in his speeches like he used to do in the past.He will be a moderate when he will take all the UNCONSTITUTIONAL REMARKS out of our politics like"One nation under GOD" and "In GOD we trust",he will allow the homosexual couples to marry just like the HETEROSEXUAL CITIZENS,He will denounce the ILLEGITIMATE and UNJUSTIFIED EXISTANCE of ISRAEL which is based on RACISM and INJSUTICE,will announce that from today onward people will be treated on the basis of their actions,they won't be treated as GOD-CHOSEN or GOD-NEGLECTED on the basis of the RACE or FAMILY they are born in.AMERICANS won't be treated as GOD-NEGLECTED and NON-AMERICANS won't be treated as GOD-CHOSEN,United States won't be considered as UNHOLY LAND and ISRAEL which is not a US territory will not be treated as a HOLY LAND.U.S Constitution will be the SUPREME LAW,not that BIBLE which discriminates against the AMERICANS by not promisisng them a SINGLE PENNY and PROMISING the NON AMERICAN EUROPEAN INVADERS in PALESTINE a LAND in the MIDDLE EAST

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.

[sharncedar]

"President Bush ... was not satisfied with the progress of efforts to stop the sharp escalation of violence in Iraq"

Oh man - this guy sounds like a manager I had before. He messes the situation up, and then calls in the employee to tell him he's not satisfied.


We need to promote Bush, he has real management potential. He's not satisfied ... wow, that takes some supreme stupidity and arrogance. Wow.

Put this guy in charge of Ford Motor Company. He would sink the entire product line into som insane vehicles like 100,000 pound super-SUV's, then fire 38,000 employees when no one buys them. I can see Bush calling all 38,000 Ford employees into his office. Bush - "I'm not satisfied with the sales numbers, no one is buying that wonderful car I designed, the 100,000 pound super-SUV, so you are all fired. Next time do a better job or I'll fire you again. (satisfied smirk). Hmmm ... what was the number for that Chinese manufacturing plant ... "

[sandycat2]

Patriot, Bush is not a radical. He's a moderate.

[kalatur]

observantX: You said "January 2008 can

[observantx]

Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim probably spent that hour in our White House amusing himself by running rings around Clueless Leader. As for the meeting with Condi, who made what clear to whom?

Here is a man from a family of spiritual leaders, who was active in the Safar Intifada, a founding member of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, who headed its military wing while in exile there, and was the top candidate for the United Iraqi Coalition in 2005. Contrast that with boy George who couldn%u2019t manage a baseball team and couldn%u2019t bother to show up for duty in the Champagne Squadron.

January 2008 can%u2019t come quick enough.

[rharrin1]

USAWarrior

You forgot LIAR THIEF COWARD

[patriotic9]

How nice a CHRISTIAN RADICAL(BUSH)sitting with an ISLAMIC RADICAL(AL-HAKIM).These ISLAMIC RADICALS are fooling these NON-SENSE CHRISTAIN RADICALS to kill the AMERICANS by AMERICANS'TAX PAYED MONEY and AMERICAN'S SODLIER'S LIVES but BUSH won't ever understand it as he doesn't find any description of this situation and complication in his BIBLE,oh by the way which version of BIBLE he should check?How would he know which version of the BIBLE is the one revealed on JESUS according to the RADICAL CHRISTIAN BELIEF.

[rsoxfan1123]

bush is "not satisfied with the progress of efforts to stop the sharp escalation of violence in Iraq."
Someone once posted on here that this is like the captain of the Titanic being "dissatisfied" with the iceberg situation. What a moron.

[tucson23]

Hadley keeps saying, "we have been making adjustments, but the goals have not changed." What he doesn't seem to understand is that it's the goals that need to change. What the president wants is impossible, and even if it wasn't, it could never be achieved through military force--we all know it, but they're too stubborn, stupid, or both to see it.

[shingles1]

I guess reporting bushrocks1's comments as spam hasn't worked.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.

[randalds]

The war in Iraq has been a rousing success for those it was fought for, the rich. Defense contractors are making money hand over fist and oil company profits have never been higher. Sure the war is costing human lives on both sides, but what do they care when none (or few) of their "class" are fighting and dying in it? Of course it's costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, but what do they care when the money is simply being transferred from us and into their bank accounts? Our soldiers deaths and those of Iraqi civilians are just a minor cost of doing war for them and they actually cost them nothing, so this has been a very profitable war indeed for Bush's handlers and those who control his puppet strings. I wonder how much of a payoff he and Cheney get?

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.

[usawarrior]

In past years, many of us have said that the Carter presidency was inept, naove, hesitant and we even gave President Carter labels that should no be said amongst people of good upbringing%u2026 All well deserved! But now; how should we label President Bush%u2026 blind, ignorant, naove, childish or %u201Call of the above%u201D? According to him, there is no global warming; the war in Iraq is a good idea and going well, his foreign policy is right on target%u2026 I%u2019m sure that by now he sent his annual letter to Santa. Wow!!!! A couple of years ago I used to be one of the %u201Cwilling%u201D.