Comments on: Bush 'Not Satisfied' With Iraq Progress
President Tells Key Shiite Leader That More Needs To Be Done To Stop Sectarian Violence
- *The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq.*
They aren't found, they are carefully created by a culture that is relative to all other cultures on earth; it's a carefully orchestrated movement, that's been a syndrome since mankind first began to gather and form various forms of government..
And that is the failure of all mankind to govern itself! - Reply to this comment
- *The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq.*
They aren't found, they are carefully created by a culture that is relative to all other cultures on earth; it's a carefully orchestrated movement, that's been a syndrome since mankind first began to gather and form various forms of government..
**An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure.**
Not everyone likes to drink the wine of ******, some go mad once they get a taste of it, others dilute it with their own mix. - Reply to this comment
- Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.
- Reply to this comment
- **It is abundantly clear that the vast conspiracy theories and obsessive hatred of the President has made the vast majority of you on here unable to recognize diplomacy or how government actually works.**
Diplomacy and government runs best when conspiricy flourishes so that the ruling bodies obsessive hatred for its enemies might be fully negotiated to the taking of trade routes, and natural reserves to ensure the survival and growth of the capital gains that the rulers of that land bargain for.
Maybe you are the one that hasn't learned from history, that all good things must come to an end and they come to an end because they turn out to not be good things.
America will stumble and fall, and be no more.
It will be totally destroyed by fire. - Reply to this comment
- Kudos to President Bush for continuing his efforts to improve the situation in Iraq. The majority of you on this site kept saying he needed to talk more and brandish the sword less, so now he is talking but that is not good enough for you.
It is abundantly clear that the vast conspiracy theories and obsessive hatred of the President has made the vast majority of you on here unable to recognize diplomacy or how government actually works. Stay on your computer keyboards though and you might change the world, or more likely, in 2008 sanity will have returned, Republicans will be back in power in the congress and all of you will be on here still saying the same garbage over and over again. - Reply to this comment
- Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.
- Reply to this comment
- Does anybody still think we are better off with SECULAR SADDAM out of power?Why don't people in BUSH administration understand these things?I am scared BUSH may not be capable to understand their TUQIYYAH BOOBY TRAP.
- Reply to this comment
- jn122736
People who use the weapons and money given by UNITED STATES are not only IRAQI INSURGENTS but their HEZBOLLAH brothers in LEBANON and their HAMAS brothers in PALESTINE.The demand is too high so early shortage is expected. - Reply to this comment
- Hakim wants more weapons and or money to help Iraq. Has he used up all the millions that went missing not too long ago.
- Reply to this comment
- I think the only people who were capable to understand and fight the RADICAL ISLAM were the ATHEIST RUSSIANS who were defeated by the EXTREMIST RADICAL MUSLIMS by the help of their EXTREMSIT RADICAL CHRISTIAN BROTHERS in the REAGAN ADMINISTRATION.
- Reply to this comment
- Bush has big smiles on his face as Al-Hakim, whom the U.S. government's own intelligence sources have linked to death squads, was being praised by Bush! Bush is friends with the ones who want to destroy us!
- Reply to this comment
- Al-Hakim is gonna do the ARM-JOB as long as the Iranian masters counter-part agree on the said JOB. Iran providing the men and the martyrs and Walking-Liar providing the Tools. Nice team-work. This is the walking-liar's way of liberating the Iraqi population.
- Reply to this comment
- Wasn't it better to shake Saddam's hands then this RADICAL ISLAMIST's hand whose purpose of life is to kill infidels.I bet Bush&Co. don't know very basics of how these RADICAL ISLAMIST SHIA will keep on taking our tax payed money and our weapons to kill our soldiers in Iraq and to supply those weapons to their RADICAL HEZBOLLAH brothers in LEBANON.I feel so frustrated when I see how stupid people in our govt are how our country is going towards hell hole because of lack of knowlege and undersatnding of these RADICAL MUSLIMS and to start a war in a way which only benifits RADICAL ISLAM AND RADICAL MUSLIMS.
I bet these NON-SENSE CHRISTIAN RADICALS who have started a war in a way which only help their RADICAL MUSLIM BROTHERS in achieving their ultimate goal of forming an ISLAMIC EMPIRE by our tax money and weapons,don't even know that the SHIA ISLAM is based on a concept called TUQIYYAH which means telling lies to the infidels or to keep INFIDELS in darkness by showing a friendly face but to stab at the back is one of the most rewarding action in SHIA ISLAM.Our terrorism experts waste their time in researching about how SHIA and SUNNI sects were fromed 1400 years ago but they are not taught about concept like TUQIYYAH which makes a big difference in how the fight against a SHIA RADICAL should be different in the way we should fight against a SUNNI RADICAL. - Reply to this comment
- This is a very odd scene with Bush! Al-Hakim, whom the U.S. government's own intelligence sources have linked to death squads, was being praised by the U.S. president.
- Reply to this comment
- 'We talked about the need to give the government Iraq more capability as soon as possible so the elected government of Iraq can do that which the Iraqi people want to secure their country from extremists and murderers'
Walking-liar forgot to mention the LIARS as well. - Reply to this comment
- Wouldn't the walking liar be shaking a hoof if it were truly the devil?
- Reply to this comment
- whose hand is Walking-liar shaking? It's all confusing... whose hand is this leader shaking?, the devil's?
- Reply to this comment
- Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.
- Reply to this comment
- "Danes acquitted over Iraq secrets"
Denmark, what a country!
Now, that's national media and court of "public interest" worthy of their names.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6206848.stm - Reply to this comment
- Lord Bush is a FASCIST.
I'm not even sure he's human. If he is, I think he was born without a soul. - Reply to this comment



