Comments on: Bill O'Reilly In Abortion Record Tangle
Kansas Clinics Want Fox TV Host, State Attorney General Investigated
- To Roadking:
An excerpt from your comment describing John Jerry:
He opens his yap and starts talking before he realizes what he has said.
Books have been writtn on Bushism's so I want go into detail here. If you want to see someone who speaks before thinking you only need to look at Bush. "Bring em On" "Mushroom cloud" " Liberators"
I will say to you as so many of your neocon buddies said to me prior to the invasion of Iraq which I fiercely protested, " If you do not like this country , get out." Such rhetoric has gotten us to this point in time. The tides are changing so I would advise you to adjust accordingly. - Reply to this comment
- I challenge you neo-cons to come off of your hate filled, projections and neo-con propaganda (roadking) and explain to the American voter a few things:
1. Why has the NIA declared Iraq a cause celeb and recruiting bonanza for terrorists?
2. How does the GOP congress justify giving themselves a raise every year but hasn't been able to raise the minimum wage since Bush has been in office?
3. How are exporting jobs and a burgeoning federal debt good for America?
4. Why do the top 2% of tax payers deserve a tax cut in a time of war?
5. Why does Halliburton deserve no-bid contracts in Iraq and New Orleans?
6. Why do D. Chaney and big Oil Company executives get to write the energy policy for America?
7. What makes a GOP majority more important than getting a pedophile away from Congressional pages?
8. Why does your party run racist ads in the South?
9. How does putting our troops in the middle of a civil war make us safer at home?
10. Abramoff, Cunningham, DeLay, Reed, Frist... the list of GOP scandals is vast. What's up with that?
- Reply to this comment
- roadking,
You sound like a Limbaugh, O'Really regurgitation machine. Your post is a heaping pile of carp. Nothing of substance to say on voting day? - Reply to this comment
- O'reilley acts the fool to become rich. It's working. The right wing idealogues dont care about law, fairness, or common sense. They have
a vengefull god on thier side, "just like the taliban." - Reply to this comment
- Whether or not the crime of the 10-year old was reported to the authorities is one matter. I fully believe it should have been. It is called sexual assault of a minor and is a felony.
A second important matter is whether O'Reilly has had access to anyone's medical records. These are supposed to be confidential. I worked in a hospital for over 13 years, and patient confidentiality is something that is pushed constantly. Some hospitals and doctors' offices have had to physically alter their offices to maintain this confidentiality. I would be extremely irate and ready to sue anyone who gave access to my records to someone in the media, no matter whether they are on Fox, CNN, ABC, or any of the others. - Reply to this comment
- Bill is about as fair and balanced as a one-legged bully on the playground.
- Reply to this comment
- GRAB YOUR ANKLES REPUBLICANS SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED A HEAPEN PLATE OF TEXAS DICKTATERS THE REST OF AMERICA HAS HAD OUR FILL YOU CAN HAVE ALL YOU WANT FROM NOW ON!
- Reply to this comment
- Hey RHARRIN,
Dubya has caused thousands more to die than Manson did. Manson ain't in Dubya's League.
Why is it we worry about someone else that isn't causing you 1 minutes sleep. Ain't costing you 1 penny! It's nobody's business what a women want's to do with her life. People would be better served if they mind their own business. - Reply to this comment
- When the Republican Party stated they were the party of Morality to get the Fawells and Dobsons to garner the Religious Vote,they must Practice what they Preach. They should be held to a higher standard. They should of never moved into that Glass House.Looks like it come back and bit them on their Butt! Anyone that votes Republican believing them to be the Christian Party. Well, I gotta bridge I'd like to sell ya.
- Reply to this comment
- Here is the text from The Abortionsts own website:
"No person shall perform or induce a partial birth abortion when the fetus is viable unless such person is a physician and has a documented referral from another physician not legally or financially affiliated with the physician performing or inducing the abortion and both physicians determine that: (1) the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant women; or (2) a continuation of the pregnancy will cause substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman."
Its very simple. Either he is following the law or he is not. If there are allegations of illegal activity, then the Atty Gen. should investigate and take the appropriate actions. If there is no illegality, then the matter should be dropped.
In any case, the files should be turned over to the authorities so that the truth can be discovered. Whoever wins the election for Atty. Gen. in Kansas has the obligation to the law and to the state constitution to follow through even though the doctor himself has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the race. - Reply to this comment
- Was there ever a time when "common sense" ruled?
I mean there have to be limits to everything, doesn't there? What good does "name-calling" do? We should get back to allowing good horse-sense to prevail. How much more stupid can mankind get?
The political campaign going on right now barely touches on the choices we have. Most of it is name-calling, mud-slinging, back-stabbing ***. And I mean from all parties.
O'Reilly reported on something that should be throughly investigated. That is the bottom line. - Reply to this comment
- Was there ever a time when "common sense" ruled?
I mean there have to be limits to everything, doesn't there? What good does "name-calling" do? We should get back to allowing good horse-sense to prevail. How much more stupid can mankind get?
The political campaign going on right now barely touches on the choices we have. Most of it is name-calling, mud-slinging, back-stabbing ***. And I mean from all parties.
O'Reilly reported on something that should be throughly investigated. That is the bottom line. - Reply to this comment
- Book.
Ever heard of the term "Borked?" - Reply to this comment
- One more comment about the poster who said that conservatives were intelectuals and liberals were dirt digging mud throwers.
Amen. Just a quick glance of these posts will show you that conservatives are routinely called neo nazis, perverts, pill poppers, theives, liars, chickens and charletons.
While you can find disgraced politicians in any party that have personal failures, its hardly helpful to attack someone of a conservative point of view with the lowest form of name calling. High School is over, join the grownups in the debate. - Reply to this comment
- Fox & O'Reilly chose this story at this time because Kansas is such a bastion of conservatisum & they were trying to stoke the conservative vote a bit.
A great many conservatives are under the mistaken impression that if they vote for Republicans, that such politians will work toward the eventual overturn of Roe vs Wade.
Republicans like keeping the issue alive because it brings them votes nationwide but let's take a look at Republican achievements over the last 40 yrs in this regard.
Of the 4 Republican presidents over this period, (Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II) every single time a position opened on the Supreme Court, giving them an opportunity to effect a change on this issue, those presidents appointed (& Republican senators approved) capitalists (primarily interested in protecting the rights of corporations, the wealthy & powerful) to those slots rather than moralists (who might be interested in ending the majority of abortion.)
It doesn't take 40 yrs (or even 20 yrs) to change a law. Republicans are really not interested in changing the status quo in this regard. They are simply using the issue to deceptively obtain votes. If they really wanted to change the law it would have been done 25 yrs ago. - Reply to this comment
- I like Oreilly. I saw the program and he did lose his cool. But the woman whom he was interviewing was absolutly against doctors reporting the impregnation of even 10 yr olds. It pissed him off and it pissed me off too.
Protecting Rapists under the name of "choice" is extreme to the extreme, and way out of step with the american people. - Reply to this comment
- well 'Tomorrows, the last two presidental elections I voted for Bush.
and all I can say is ..... "I'm Sorry"
the GOP is an embrassing mess and the first step on the road to recovery is admitting there is a problem.
I'm man enough to take the first step...are you?
and while you're at, think about a little something
the first few hours after 9/11
where was Bush?
where was Rudy? - Reply to this comment
Our tomorrows
So what you are saying is If charles manson was a republican you would vote for him. I say you are one sick puppy.- Reply to this comment
- Well, "aint", should a crime be reported? Was the crime reported? Will you agree that an adult impregnating an eleven-year-old is a crime? Take your pick, but see if you can answer at least one of these.
- Reply to this comment
- B USH AND R USH
BOTH LOVE TO G USH ==
THEIR NAMES THE SAME
WE SPELL THEM %u2026LAME ==
THEY PREACH AND SCOLD,
THEIR LIES ARE OLD.
WE DON'T BELIEVE
ONE THING THEY'VE TOLD. ==
ITS UP TO USH
TO MAKE THEM SHUSH ==
CAUSE WHAT THEY GUSH
MAKES FOLEY BLUSH ! ==
BUT LETS NOT HUSH
THAT ONE'S A LUSH ==
THEY MAKE A FUSH
AND TALK PURE MUSH ==
SO KISH MY TUSH =======
PILL POPPIN' RUSH!
- Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 



