Comments on: McCain Raps Clintons On North Korea

Leader In GOP Presidential Derby Takes Swipe At Democratic Front-Runner

[jsilver2th]

Why do you call this guy the front runner? Rudy Giuliani seems to lead him in the polls. McCain had a lot of primary losses when he ran before and if he thinks cuddling up to Jerry Falwell gives him more appeal the guy just does not get why he had appeal to start with. It might make one think he just another phony.

[pakaal]

No less than six years into the Bush administration, two years into his second term, with the American people up to our necks in the Iraq quagmire, leaving North Korea free to develop what seems to be a fledgling nuclear program, and who is Senator McCain blaming? Who else? Bill Clinton! I swear, the only thing the Republicans haven't accused him of yet is Global Warming.

Let's see here, exactly what has George Bush done on the North Korean issue since he took office six years ago? Well, let's see I do recall him saying that North Korea was part of a modern "Axis of Evil". And.... Umm.... Yeah, I think that's about it. It's great to play the oldies but goodies, but seriously, Bush has had a Republican House and Senate to work with his entire presidency, the closest thing to carte blanche a president could ask for. If there is a failure here, it's because we were misled about and misfocused upon Iraq, at the cost of not addressing a real threat - North Korea.

The Bush Administration didn't deal with this, so let's be honest and say so, rather than try to blame someone who hasn't been in office for two whole terms.

[janemcgreeve]

Hey Bellal,

Not angry. Actually I get a kick out of the anal-retentive neo-fascists who call themselves Liberals and don't even know what the word means. They're laughable, and you're right, both parties have their share of losers and half-wits. From my perspective though, it is the Dems who are much, much worse because they lie through their teeth and try to say its the truth.
Bull____.

One other thing that they won't admit, girl, is that Clinton was a predator, a sad sack who claimed he loved women. If demeaning is Love, then I wonder what is hate to the finger-wagging pervert. He's a gutless joke, and so is that cuckolded shrill shrew who still defends him!

[bellal-2009]

Whoa! Jane! down girl. You is one angry white chick. What's up with that. Both parties have their fair share of corruption let's face it. that's politics.

[janemcgreeve]

nynative,

the shoe obviously fits in your case. After all, what did Clinton do to get at Bin Laden? One half-assed missile strike and crying that Arafat would be offended when Clarke suggested another strike after the Cole bombing. Nothing else. Nothing more.

And North Korea? He gave them economic aid - not bomb their nuke sites. But hey, he reserved that for innocent Serbian civilians.

Go and sieg heil your cuckolded shrill shrew Hil and that hapless *** who looks like the befuddled defense attorney on "Law and Order SVU" - you know, Chuckie Schmucker. Oh, but you're too busy sieg heiling your other hero Sharpton.

[janemcgreeve]

Neo-Cons might not be perfect. But they are *** good patriotic Americans who care about their country and our future.

What do you Neo-Fascists stand for - you from MoveOn.Org, from Air Hate America, from ANSWER, from the Daily Kostroite? The second coming of Hitler, but if he doesn't arrive another Clinton or Carter will do, right. Since you hate Jews and Christians so much, why not elect your hero KKK Byrd - or is the white-sheeted *** just a little too much for you?

[janemcgreeve]

Should we reward a Democratic Party that gave us the Ayatollah's Iran; that moddycuddled Arafat, that refused to go after Bin Laden - and they had much better chances of getting him than Bush did. After all, we knew where he was in the Clinton years - and the pervert was too busy with Monica or bombing Serbs to want to do anything about it.

Funny how every response to my comments is typical Democratic Neo-Nazi (and if the shoe does fit, wear it, kiddies - after all, you've retained a Klansman in our government, not the GOP) Evasiveness and Lies. Even when we admit Bush or McCain have faults, the Dems and their Neo-Nazi allies can't bring themselves to saying the same about Clinton, Carter, or the traitor Kerry.

Not once. Not at all. Just lie - just hate Bush and love the finger wagging perv and his shrew; just love the Jew-baiting Carter. That's all - and that's all that you are.

Pretty pathetic. But then again, you wouldn't have it any other way.

[nynative1340]

So, janem, what has Bush done to get bin Laden? What has Bush done to mitigate the North Korean nuclear threat? The answer is: Bush's only focus since he took office in 2001 was to wage war on the man who embarrased his father; to wage war on the man who tried to assasinate his father. It didn't matter that bin Laden was responsible for almost 3000 American deaths, Bush's focus was on getting Saddam. We all know the rest... Apparently you don't.

All these negative things you say about Democrats, but you haven't put forth (or put out), any positives that Bush has done on the same subjects.

You must live one bitter life to feel the way you do and say the things you say. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is a Nazi?? HA HA HA. We know where you are coming from.

[nynative1340]

Yes, janem is an Ann Coulter fanatic in the true sense of the word. Very mean spirited...

[the74blaster]

I several comments here and hopefully somone can answer them without resorting to name calling or going back into history to rip on previous presidents.

Should we reward the Bush administration a GOP majority considering how it has performed over the over the last 6 years?

Better yet can anyone tell me about a foreign policy success in the Bush administration?

Does the fiscal irresponsibility of the GOP and the Bush administration warrant another 2 years of GOP majorities?

As an engineer I am paid to provide a solution that addresses a need for my customers. I cannot afford to exceed my budget or timing requirements for my assigned projects without being held accountable. Why is that we are not holding this administration accountable for their failures over the last 6 years? Are they royalty or above the law?

The fact is the GOP has had 6 years to solve all those problems the democrats are being blamed for.

All I ask is to keep that in mind and disregard the negative campaign ads when deciding who to vote for. Focus on the issues.