Comments on: Report: No Proof Of Qaeda-Saddam Link

Senate Committee Finds Hussein Had No Relationship With Zarqawi

Add a Comment See all 68 Comments
by ronniehm September 8, 2006 10:23 PM EDT
There was no terrorism under Clinton's watch? Oh.

What were the first attack on the World Trade Center, the Oklahoma City bombing, the suicide bombing of American soldiers in Saudi Arabia, the other suicide bombing of American soldiers in Saudi Arabia, the bombing of the US embassies in Africa in 1998, the USS Cole?

What were those? If they're not part of Clinton's legacy, then how can 9/11 be part of Bush's legacy? What did Bush do in his first 8 months to make 9/11 his fault? What did Clinton do differently?
Reply to this comment
by agnim September 8, 2006 10:10 PM EDT
Hey, Ronnie, for shame.

Clinton has been gone for almost a decade now.
However the main maniac muslims continue to make worse bush's lousy 911 legacy by repeatedly taunting bush from the bushes of Pakistan.

What did Clinton do about terrorism you ask? "Terrorism" wasn't 'created' then.

"Terrorism" is creation of the present administration; and by the look of things, our beloved president is creating even more terrorists via the crucible of Iraq, just as his dad did before him.
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 8, 2006 9:44 PM EDT
By the way, I think 63% of Americans can't find Baghdad on a map, so that should tell you something about how much your approval rating is worth.
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 8, 2006 9:42 PM EDT
Approval rating? What does that have to do with anything? You can't vote on facts. They're facts. Clinton did NOTHING to fight terrorism. Who cares if people approve of that?
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 8, 2006 9:37 PM EDT
The first attack on the World Trade Center happened on Clinton's "watch." The second attack was planned during Clinton's "watch." Flight training was received during Clinton's "watch." Osama bin Laden was in our sights during Clinton's "watch." The hijackers entered the country during Clinton's "watch." What the heII was Clinton WATCHING? I can understand a president not being able to discover and prevent 9/11 in 8 months, but 8 YEARS? Did Bill even lift his head above the desk and ask what's going on in the world? Argue all you want that Bush did the wrong thing, but you can't deny that he's trying to fight terrorism and Clinton didn't do a d@mn thing. Name ONE THING Bill Clinton did to fight terrorism.
Reply to this comment
by patriotic9 September 8, 2006 9:31 PM EDT
Saddam hussain is Anti religion and Al qaeda is extremist religious group.Saddam hussain was only good with Iraqi catholics because he knew that in a muslim country nobody would like to see a catholic being president.He killed those Iraqis who wanted to establish a radical islamic state.Saddam Hussain has been removed from power by US effort and those extremist shias were brought into power on the name of democracy who are taking the American Tax payer's money on the name of rebuilding,to form an extremist state based on the hatred of west.Now all the elected Prime Ministers of Iraq'll practically be the Governor's from Iran.
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 8, 2006 9:27 PM EDT
Agnim, what makes the source for bin Laden's current whereabouts more reliable than the source that told us al Qaeda received training in Iraq? You got a system for knowing which terrorists to believe and which ones are lying? Or should we just roll the dice and hope we pick the right one?
Reply to this comment
by agnim September 8, 2006 9:20 PM EDT
Fryken, your brains are fried, guy. LOL

The 3000 Americans of 911 perished on bush's watch!
That 911 day of infamy is the legacy of president of the time.

And no matter how much we try to pass the buck and delude ourselves that the previous administration was responsible, and no matter how many more Americans we sacrifice in hopeless causes, and no matter how many tens of thousands of innocent women and children we rain bombs on in Iraq, those pointless and destructive acts will never ever ever erase the fact that 911 is bush's legacy.

That legacy is only made worse when we thrash wildly about and kill, kill, kill while insane islamists in Pakistan taunt, taunt, taunt!
Reply to this comment
by agnim September 8, 2006 9:07 PM EDT
'No proof of al qaeda-Sadam link' you say?

Why not tell us something the vast majority of Americans didn't know or should have known before the raining of bombs on the women and children of Iraq, and the wasting of so many more young American lives?

What is also known or should have known by most Americans is where the main maniac muslims allegedly responsible for 911 are taking leisurely strolls and mocking a seemingly inept leadership: In the cool mountains of Pakistan thy are.
The double agent Pakistanis who should know have always admitted as much.

Maybe the plan is to create fire in Iraq, and those responsible for 911 will surrender in Pakistan. Tsk Tsk
Reply to this comment
by fryken-2009 September 8, 2006 8:28 PM EDT
Everyone who believes a Congressional report stand on your head!!
Reply to this comment
See all 68 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: