Comments on: Judge Orders Gitmo Detainees' Release

Five Algerians Accused Of Planning To Join Al Qaeda May Go Free; Gov't Appeal Likely Says CBS News Legal Analyst

Add a Comment See all 78 Comments
by babooph November 20, 2008 9:08 PM EST
Many years too late-what happened to the USA??
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave November 20, 2008 9:05 PM EST
AHHH SHUCKS---Little George loves playing ruler of DEVILS ISLAND. This is a new America. Forget the old human rights innocent until proven guilty stuff. Remember born more than one time George talks to some God. This God told him to give the CIA money to buy humans and then cage them without charges or trial. This will impress the stupid masses who believe some evil terror dudes were behind 9/11.
Reply to this comment
by guadalcanal3 November 20, 2008 9:02 PM EST
LloydBest1...Wow!...Are you brain-dead or something?...9/11 was ALL Bin Laden and Al Qaeda...PERIOD...Bush did what he had to do to protect America...and..."You"...Whether you like Bush or not...President elect Obama will have to also "respond" and protect America...in much the same way...You''ll see....
Reply to this comment
by guadalcanal3 November 20, 2008 8:54 PM EST
AJmarine...With all due respect...When the world needs a policeman...they don''t call Sweden....So maybe we should keep our phone..."off the hook".
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 November 20, 2008 8:51 PM EST
maybe the people of the world will raise their voices enough that war crime charges will be charged to Bush and company.I find it asinine that our government would try and convict someone for torture charges ,while bush''s administration was busy doing the same thing.talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 November 20, 2008 8:46 PM EST
does that mean if we take Bush''s big stick away we can be good people again?
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine111 November 20, 2008 8:37 PM EST
has anyone ever pondered the thought...if we are the most peace loving country on earth...why does the US government have a war on just about everything?




Posted by tincup356 at 05:29 PM : Nov 20, 2008



That''s what you get when you try to be the policeman for the World.
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 November 20, 2008 8:29 PM EST
has anyone ever pondered the thought...if we are the most peace loving country on earth...why does the US government have a war on just about everything? would someone lobby to get the middle class off that list?
Reply to this comment
by mahalapril November 20, 2008 8:23 PM EST
LloydBest1- I was not talking about the 1993 bombing of WTC. I was talking about the 1998 bombings of 2 US embassies in Africa under Bill Clinton''s presidency. I can''t believe you people does not even know this.What is happening to these young Americans voting for Obama. They don''t even know who controls congress during the election, who Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are, but they know everything about the the garbage that the liberal biased media were feeding them about Sarah Palin.
Reply to this comment
by mahalapril November 20, 2008 8:09 PM EST
Gramto8- You don''t even know how to research this.Now I understand how the younger generation of Americans are misled.I saw a program where an author and teacher said that the US history books were written by Liberals.They never mentioned President John Kennedy''s confrontation with the then communist Soviet Union in the Cuban missile crisis. The US history books did not even comment about the US astronaut landing on the moon. What was portrayed in this history books in the 60''s were about KKK.America was perceived as evil empire and causing all the wars.I would suggest that you read a US history book written by other nations and you would know the truth.This will explain why these young democrats are calling Bush a criminal when he was just doing his job. You will find soon enough how Obama will be bullied around. Russia,Iran,and Al-Qaeda had already threatened the weak and naive Obama.
Reply to this comment
by lloydbest1 November 20, 2008 8:07 PM EST
"LloydBest1- You are contradicting yourself.Bush is being blamed for the faulty intelligence about Iraq''s WMDs." Posted by mahalapril at 04:39 PM : Nov 20, 2008

Nope! Bush had plenty of warning...The Minneapolis office of the FBI had a direct line on several of the hijackers. Had the evidence to arrest and convict them of sedition but were told to lay off.

"The person to blame is President Bill Clinton. He failed to protect our people and homeland..." Posted by mahalapril at 04:39 PM : Nov 20, 2008

From the 1993 attack? How many did that kill? And under whose watch were the culprits switly captured and brought to justice? All of them were tried, convicted and sentenced before Slick Willie left office.

"During Bill Clinton''''s second term Sudan offered to give up Osama Bin Ladin [who was living then in Sudan] to Clinton but Clinton refused." Posted by mahalapril at 04:39 PM : Nov 20, 2008

Sudan did no such thing. You''re getting that info from Sean Hannity who is a politically motivated pathological liar. I READ the 9-11 Commission, remember, and even that disgustingly pro-Bush rag stated; "Clinton administration officials deny ever receiving such an offer. We have not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim."

I don''t have much more room to go on but the 9-11 disaster is ALL bush. Clinton had no more to do with it than I did.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislame November 20, 2008 7:57 PM EST
" The Shrub Sheds No Truth "
Will be a Blockbuster next year,
Finally Exposing Shrub & his Hedge-row full of Corporate Thugs,..These Shady characters will have sunlight shining on their Black Hearts as the pus oozes from their flesh !
Reply to this comment
by gramto8 November 20, 2008 7:52 PM EST
Posted by mahalapril at 04:39 PM : Nov 20, 2008

I looked for evidence pro or con on this. The only thing I found about it was a couple of right wing blogs. One news site mentioned the Sudan offering FILES about bin Laden, but not the person himself.

How about you prove what you are saying by giving us some references to check?
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 November 20, 2008 7:50 PM EST
I realize I may be in the minority on this but I think the world would be a better place if a meteor landed on Bush or Cheney. Two months is too long.

Posted by impeach___w at 04:22 PM : Nov 20, 2008
------------------------

Actually I don''t think you are in the minority. Reading these threads might make you think that, but remember that these neonuts posting here are very vocal, but small in number.

The problem with your meteor wish is you used the word ''or'' between Bush and Cheney, when you should have used the word ''and''.
Reply to this comment
by mahalapril November 20, 2008 7:39 PM EST
LloydBest1- You are contradicting yourself.Bush is being blamed for the faulty intelligence about Iraq''s WMDs. You are still alive today because Bush did his job as president and protected us since 9/11.The person to blame is President Bill Clinton. He failed to protect our people and homeland . He is responsible for the massacre of the 3,000 innocent civilians on 9/11.Research this. During Bill Clinton''s second term Sudan offered to give up Osama Bin Ladin [who was living then in Sudan] to Clinton but Clinton refused. In 1998 when 2 US embassies in Africa were bombed by Al-Qaeda, Clinton instead of invading Afghanistan just launched symbolic missile strikes on a building in Sudan owned by Bin Ladin and the Al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan. Prove me wrong.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang November 20, 2008 7:26 PM EST
cant hold people without credible evidence....otherwise you could be in jail right now.
Reply to this comment
by xxunknown November 20, 2008 7:09 PM EST
RIGHT ON.
Reply to this comment
by lloydbest1 November 20, 2008 7:06 PM EST
"CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen says the suspects in question are not the dangerous terrorists the Bush administration has been warning Americans about since 9/11"
Bet they are, now.
Anyone who has read the 9-11 Commission report already knows that Bush and his administration were woefully, perhaps criminally, neglegent in failing to stop the attackers. As much of a whitewash that document was (I''ve read it and it was sickening) even it is clear that Bush knew enough soon enough that he could have foiled Atta and his henchmen with little or no effort.
I point this out to bring up the very real probability that this was the hook that His Bushness was looking for to garner support for his reckless war with Iraq. Long before he assumed the Whitehouse, getting Saddam was his wet dream and 9-11 was a perfect opportunity to fulfill it. In short, he willfully ignored the threats
So everything that followed; the disasterous war, the abuses of Guantanamo and Abu Gharib, our own rights being eroded, the wiretapping, Valerie Plame, the Wellstone and Tillman murders, our 9 trillion and counting national debt....All of that stem from the diseased mind of one man who; motivated by personal revenge, apocalypse obsession and slavish obesiance to his oil buddies and corporate masters; has brought us to the sorry state we''re in today.
I will not be sorry to see him leave office.
Reply to this comment
by penniemumm November 20, 2008 7:05 PM EST
Praise the Lord!
Reply to this comment
by potus_obama November 20, 2008 6:52 PM EST
reading the comments on here from libs is like reading spam.. WORTHLESS!!!!

Posted by libsh8theUSA at 03:27 PM : Nov 20, 2008

SPAM!!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 78 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: