Comments on: U.S. Supply Convoy Hijacked In Pakistan
Attack On Trucks Carrying Humvees For U.S.-Led Troops Shows Militant Control Of Key Route
- JoeDumber: Are you saying that the terrorists are ruining their future with acid baths, car bombs, etc.
- Reply to this comment
- Civilian deaths=Family members terrorists. Think about what you would do if a bomb blew your house up, and killed the ones you loved.
- Reply to this comment
- "Two men threw acid on 6 girls going to school" Islam at its finest.
- Reply to this comment
- "There were some U.S. military materials that were taken - Humvees and water tank trailers,"
WTH? Are all of our C-17s and C-5A/Bs tied up in Iraq? We can''''t even scrounge up some C-131s?
lolll...gee...I hope nobody with a real Army takes a swat at us.
Posted by ibsteve2u at 01:15 PM : Nov 12, 2008
Where would they land? even a C-130 needs a runway. If they are going to mountainous areas it is too dangerous to maneuver around. - Reply to this comment
- "There were some U.S. military materials that were taken - Humvees and water tank trailers,"
WTH? Are all of our C-17s and C-5A/Bs tied up in Iraq? We can''t even scrounge up some C-131s?
lolll...gee...I hope nobody with a real Army takes a swat at us. - Reply to this comment
- This is the perfect oppurtunity for the US to give the pakistan government to step up or shut the h---lll up.They need to go and retrive our goods or get back in thier tents and duck .The pakistan president is a political puppet whose strings have beome tangled.Major General petraus will not let this go unanswered.tommorow there qwill be headlines telling of our reprimand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by tootall1014 at 08:36 AM : Nov 12, 2008
+
The US was blaming Pakistan for letting its territory used by Taliban freedom fighters, yet she is using the same territory to transport weapons. US hypocrisy knows no bounds. - Reply to this comment
- The U.S. should stop embarrassing itself on the Afghanistan Pakistan border and withdraw or fund and resource forces for a fight to win it. The most noticeable trait to the way the Bush administration fights the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq is doing it on the cheap. At first there were no body armor and not enough ammo and not enough vehicle armor, then there were complaints about not enough troops to carry out missions and multiple tours in battle zones for those shouldering the burden. Is it any wonder the suicide rate is so high for our brave troops? Hopefully Pres.-elect Obama will do much better, fight these wars to win them or withdraw. The Bush strategy seems to be one of treading water, not trying to lose.
- Reply to this comment
- I guess we should attack and occupy Pakistan as well as Afghanistan? Do you not want to exact revenge for this action just like 9-11? Come on LIBS, the answer is waiting?
- Reply to this comment
- Al Qada is a clique of Felons who commit heinous murders for fear and respect. Their terror activities threaten the People into submission. Bin Laden is a crime syndicate boss. His operation deals illicit smut (magazines, DVD, Internet porn), illegal narcotics, and stolen property. Osama has the money to buy political influence. Islamabad protects Waziristan with modern military weapons and technology.
- Reply to this comment
- The convoy was abviously hijacked by liberals who thought it was the government bread and cheese truck.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




