Comments on: U.K. Official: Don’t Exaggerate Terror
Ex-Intelligence Official Says Playing Up Al Qaeda Risks Inaction Against Other Threats
- CBS_Oliver,,,,, Oh, OK. I had to put on my glasses, I thought you said Richard Nixon
- Reply to this comment
- Thank God for Richard Mottram.
Good man! - Reply to this comment
- Today''s (Sunday 16 Dec) New York Times article:
Afghan Mission Is Reviewed as Concerns Rise
By THOM SHANKER and STEVEN LEE MYERS
Deeply worried about the prospect of failure, the Bush administration and NATO have begun three top-to-bottom reviews.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bush is now worried he has failed in Afghanistan. He only wanted to show that Clinton''s missiles fired into Afghanistan from afar had no effect, and he was going to do it right!
If he read history, he may have found out the Soviets with their ICBM''s, nuclear subs, supersonic planes and large armies ended up the same way.
And, if he read history, he also may have found out that the "US Army of One" with its missiles fired from afar into Afghanistan, Iraq, Viet Nam or Korea is absolutely incapable of fighting anyone except Grenada or some similar small isolated island. - Reply to this comment
- terroris1am7--Lars,,, As I''ve said many times Dont Exaggerate the problem, all you do is feed into it
- Reply to this comment
- It''s not possible to overstate the problem with Muslimist terrorists.
I quake, literally quake in my boots every time I even think that a Muslimist might be in my neighborhood. What if they looked at me sideways? What if they walked by my house? What if they spoke to me?
I''m sorry, I can''t go on. I need to get a tissue now and dab my eyes. - Reply to this comment




