Comments on: Spy Chief Shares Surveillance Secrets

National Intelligence Director Reveals Previously Classified Details About Foreign Surveillance

Add a Comment See all 102 Comments
by donnie900 August 23, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
Nancy Reagan gave me a dildddo. Ya think she''s in cahoots with my doctor?
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:38 PM EDT

Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:24 AM : Aug 23, 2007

And it really tells us that we have no chance to change the things that happened. The History Channel ran a 9/11 hit piece the other day and guess who owns the HC? GE, and yellow journalism hacks Hearts Publishing own popular mechanics.

Mrs. Laura Bush presents a plaque to Abbe Raven, center, president and CEO of A&E Television Networks, and Nancy Dubuc, president of The History Channel, honoring them with a 2007 Preserve America Presidential Award in the Rose Garden at the White House Wednesday, May 9, 2007, honored for the establishment of the Save Our History grant program for historic preservation, and promotion of the historic hertiage of America. White House photo by Joyce Boghosian.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/
news/releases/2007/05/images/20070509-4_
p050907jb-0332-1-515h.html
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:34 PM EDT
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:24 AM : Aug 23, 2007

And it really tells us that we have no chance to change of of the things that happened. The History Channel ran a 9/11 hit piece the other day and guess who owns the HC? GE and yellow journalism hacks Hearts Publishing own popular mechanics.

Mrs. Laura Bush presents a plaque to Abbe Raven, center, president and CEO of A&E Television Networks, and Nancy Dubuc, president of The History Channel, honoring them with a 2007 Preserve America Presidential Award in the Rose Garden at the White House Wednesday, May 9, 2007, honored for the establishment of the Save Our History grant program for historic preservation, and promotion of the historic hertiage of America. White House photo by Joyce Boghosian.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/images/20070509-4_p050907jb-0332-1-515h.html
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 August 23, 2007 2:30 PM EDT

"http://www.theameri0canmonitor.com/articles/truth_disinfo.html
Posted by red164 at 11:24 AM : Aug 23, 2007"

This one is good too ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html

"CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July.- Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro."
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:24 PM EDT
Responding to such explosive information, the 9/11 Family Steering Committee, largely credited for forcing the very creation of the 9/11 Commission, submitted the following questions to be answered during the course of the government%u2019s investigation: !--[endif]--

7 Why did Mahmood Ahmed, Director of Pakistan''s secret service, the ISI, order Saeed Sheikh to wire $100,000 to hijacker Mohamed Atta?

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]--

7 What was Mahmood Ahmed''s relationship with Al Qaeda?

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]--

7 Where did the money come from?

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]--

7 Did officials in Pakistan know in advance about the terrorist attack?

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]--

7 On September 11th, Mahmood Ahmed had a breakfast meeting in Washington, D.C., with House and Senate Intelligence Committee chairmen, Rep. Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham. What were they discussing?

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]-- All of the above questions were completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission in their Final Report. It should therefore come as no surprise that members of the Family Steering Committee are demanding an explanation%u2026

http://www.theamericanmonitor.com/articles/truth_disinfo.html
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 August 23, 2007 2:24 PM EDT
Posted by parrot2

Just can''t get enough of me now can you Polly Wanna. You like to have everything out in the open -- isn''t that what you loonies call encroachment er, oversight? So now it''s all out there for you. And audiences like me are only outraged by the hypocrisy of you loonies. D/amed if you don''t and d/amed if you do. So then it''s only okay when the New York Times leaks info.
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw August 23, 2007 2:24 PM EDT
Following the money is perhaps the most basic and essential tactic used by criminal investigators to solve major crimes,. . .

Posted by red164 at 11:21 AM : Aug 23, 2007

And, if we follow the money as relates to the events of 9/11/01, it leads to Israel, ExxonMobil (other war profiteers) and US government agencies including the DoD and CIA.

But, it does not lead to OBL or al qaida.

It appears the military is fighting the wrong "enemies."
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey August 23, 2007 2:22 PM EDT
[Well from now on anyone who serves in Congress and the Senate will have to have their children serve in the military otherwise they will relinquish the right as governing body that gives the Executive war authorizations. If their children don''''t serve, then can no longer be in Congress. ]
[Posted by mudrose at 11:06 AM : Aug 23, 2007]

doesn''t the village idiot have two daughters ... maybe the new fiance (that works in the white house) would like to stand up for his country too.
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:21 PM EDT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Following the money is perhaps the most basic and essential tactic used by criminal investigators to solve major crimes, yet, according to the 9/11 Commission, the source of the money used to facilitate the 9/11 attacks was of %u201Clittle practical significance%u201D to their investigation.

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]-- Consequently, the 9/11 Commission completely failed to examine the conspirators financial network, admitting with no shame that the %u201Corigin of the funds [used to plan and carry out the attacks] remains unknown.%u201D

!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-- !--[endif]-- This is curious for a number of reasons, most notably because of reports directly linking the financers of the attacks to the governments of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United States, specifically to underground networks historically used by the CIA.

http://www.theamericanmonitor.com/articles/truth_disinfo.html
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 August 23, 2007 2:21 PM EDT
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm
Posted by king77shaw at 11:02 AM : Aug 23, 2007

Check this one too:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609105

"Cherry Tree vs. Crjpes Suzette: Global Model of Collapse of the World Trade Centers"
Reply to this comment
by processor2 August 23, 2007 2:20 PM EDT
Tokyo Rose would have been proud
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey August 23, 2007 2:18 PM EDT
["Part of this is a classified world. The fact that we''re doing it this way means that some] [Americans are going to die," he said. ]

how many mike?

how many will die if you make everything secret? what''s that ... you don''t know ... like you really don''t know much at all ... couple of sattelite pics, some wire taps, videos from al jazera ... two pieces of white bread crust from osama''s bologna sandwich ...
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw August 23, 2007 2:17 PM EDT
I''m sure those "terrorists" learned a lot from that interview.

It seems to me the word "classified" has become way overused. And, appears to mean, "Because we want everyone to think we know what we''re doing when we really don''t have a clue."

At one time, I was the custodian of classified documents for a government organization and the information we controlled was a lot more specific and enlightening than "we''re watching you."

"Govenment intelligence agency" is an oxymoron.
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:17 PM EDT
9/11 ''paymaster'' back in court, may be cleared of Pearl''s death
Omar Sheikh, a reported CIA asset and primary financer of the 9/11 attacks, is back in court to appeal his conviction in the Daniel Pearl murder case. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf''s recently released book has provided Omar''s lawyers with new evidence that may overturn the 2002 verdict.

http://www.theamericanmonitor.com/articles.html
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 23, 2007 2:14 PM EDT
Posted by king77shaw at 11:02 AM : Aug 23, 2007

Check out the History Channel discussion board 9/11 good info and the plenty of 9/11 hacks but they have a great IGNORE MEMBER button.
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 August 23, 2007 2:13 PM EDT
"Is he threatening us when he says some Americans will die?
Posted by GunOwnerDan at 11:03 AM : Aug 23, 2007"

Yes.
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." %u2014President George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/multimedia/bushism_harmamerica.mp3
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 August 23, 2007 2:13 PM EDT
"Is he threatening us when he says some Americans will die?
Posted by GunOwnerDan at 11:03 AM : Aug 23, 2007"

Yes.
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." %u2014President George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/multimedia/bushism_harmamerica.mp3
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 August 23, 2007 2:06 PM EDT
THE STANDARD NEOCON REPUBLICAN SENDING OTHERS KIDS TO FIGHT WHILE THEY ARE SAFE AT HOME!
GO FIGURE!
Posted by bluestardad

Well from now on anyone who serves in Congress and the Senate will have to have their children serve in the military otherwise they will relinquish the right as governing body that gives the Executive war authorizations. If their children don''t serve, then can no longer be in Congress.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan August 23, 2007 2:03 PM EDT
Is he threatening us when he says some Americans will die?
Reply to this comment
by lorinkundert August 23, 2007 1:54 PM EDT
Americans die every day but not a one from terrorist activity on the mainland, so take the fear mongering someplace else where people are willing to give up their rights, we are not going to give them up here. As a footnote I have heard people talk about Bush''s program working as we have not had an attack on US soil since 9/11 for 6 years, well it was 8 years from the bombing at the WTC to 9/11 so that benchmark is meaningless.
Reply to this comment
See all 102 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (328 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: