Comments on: U.S. Warns Of "Evolving" Terror Threat

Al Qaeda Will Use Iraq Contacts To Mount Attack On U.S. Soil, Intelligence Estimate Claims

[down-ndirty]

"Pro-creation is intended for just that - *** as "pleasure", in the bibles terms, is "immoral" (although certainly not in my terms)." Posted by mcdazz at 12:03 AM : Jul 18, 2007
_________________________________

So then don't you think it's strange that, if God created humans, he made sexx pleasurable? And men and women (and some monkeys/apes) are the only species that have sexx for reasons other than to procreate?

[starleo146]

I hope all this rhetoric on the terrorist are coming is just as toldyouso said again so well. I do feel myself I could be wrong this is a ploy to scare us to believe the republicans are the only ones that can handle this terrorist thing by that I mean the Bush crowd wants to believe they can do this by fear. I see the campaign going full force now in the White House every thing they are saying and doing is to overplay the campaign this is strategy folks watch there words carefully and why now, first to extend the war till Bush is gone and the next guy will inherit the whole mess. He won't give up this war and the Jerky Senate republicans try with all their might to help him succeed.

[ammianus]

The Sorrows of Young Dumus, Art. XVII:
Yet all might have been well had the Saaudi fulfilled their side of the agreement. In the event, they were neither able nor willing to restrain their subjects within Al Ghazna. Only when Dumus the Younger first learned of the attacks on his capitols (A. J. 6715, 23 Lo:os,), did he realize that his longstanding allies had betrayed him. Retaliation was prevented by an agreement documented in various incontrovertible forms (J-B. E. Roppe, op. cit., p. 361). Were the pact published, it would be clear to all that the order for deliberate inattention enabled the success of attacks that would otherwise have been thwarted through the customary operations of the Hegemon agents. The world would know that the greatest atrocity yet perpetrated on the Continent Hesperides was made possible by the gullibility, by the incompetence, and by the alien loyalties of the Dumus administration.
It is said that a second pact quickly followed. The lieutenants of ibn Shaitan, his family and friends (all proximate to the Saaud throne) were in possession of the documentation above mentioned. They vowed to publish if ibn Shaitan were ever killed or captured or if any of their number were detained for questioning. The House of Dumus capitulated, undertaking to immediately evacuate ibn Shaitan associates still on the Continent, prevent the death or capture of ibn Shaitan himself and deflect public attention from him.

[ammianus]

The Sorrows of Young Dumus, Art. XVI:
When the appointment of Stultus Dumus the Younger appeared inevitable, it is said the House of Saaud, through Prince Bandar, complained to the House of Dumus that, in their view, the security agencies of the Hegemon were harassing Saaud subjects. The Saaudi asserted that in view of the intimate friendship between the two Houses and the anticipated electoral victory for which the Saaudi had furnished a weighty contribution, the House of Dumus should undertake, once the office of Chief Magistrate was secured, to discourage the attentions of the Hegemon intelligence services toward Saaudi subjects belonging to Al Ghazna. In return, the Saaudi pledged to moderate the fanaticism of their subjects, particularly the acolytes of ibn Shaitan. Journandes reports the agreement was memorialized by several forms of documentation to ensure the continuing fidelity of both parties. When Dumus assumed office, the agreement on the side of the Hegemon was facilitated by the practice of compartmentalism. Each group within an intelligence agency assigned a specific task was alone permitted information relevant to its mission and was forbidden to share knowledge, including the bare facts of its own actions, with any other group. The House of Dumus had but to direct a handful of overseers to practice deliberate inattention where Saaud subjects were involved. These servitors performed admirably in deflecting enquiries into the activities of Saaudi Al Ghazni.

[condumism]

These ISRAEL FIRST Republican Senators are all up for Reelection in 08. Ask them how much Israel influences their vote on Iraq? Also, ask them how much US DEFENSE CONTRACTORS influence their votes in needless defense spending. These sell out America for Israel traitors and sell out America for the US MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX are listed below:

Alexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
Dominici, Pete- (R - NM)
Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
Warner, John- (R - VA)

TAKE BACK AMERICA. BAN ALL CORPORATE and FOREIGN LOBBYISTS FROM the HALLS of CONGRESS!

[lars008-2009]

Posted by zootallures2 at 09:24 AM : Jul 18, 2007

what part of they broke the ceasefire don't you understand haji...

the war is legal

the resumption of hostilities was only a matter of time since iraq broke the ceasefire agreement.....

blame saddam for iraq%u2026%u2026. Even clintoon and the dems wanted the resumption of hostilities back in 1998

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html

[zootallures2]

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its **vital interests**

Posted by lars008 at 09:10 AM : Jul 18, 2007

Which are far from even being it's own people. And "vital interests" ....LOL! An arm robbery is not the same as knowing where the nearest bathroom is when you have the runs. That would be a vital interest.

[lars008-2009]

The ex-GOP CollinPowell is a new adherent to this view. He no more believes the whole thing invasion was necessary. He's been led to tell lies to the whole world representatives in the meeting at the United Nations general Assembly when the Iraqi case was decided. Despite all what the idddioottt arse008 says, the United Nations resolutions were extracted under arm twisting and bullying by the blood-thirsty Bush Admin and his previous thief-Wolfowitz.
Posted by grazinggoat at 08:54 AM : Jul 18, 2007

hahahahaha your calling the inventor of the internet and global warming and idiot hahahahaha

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html

[grazinggoat]

Fearmongering. This administartion has been accused by numerous agencies of doctoring reports to suit their agenda. Want to bet it escalates through 2007 and into 2008? Then watch Bush pull a Bin Laden out of his hat before the elections. Remember this.
Posted by tru_america1 at 08:17 AM : Jul 18, 2007

-Amen!

- The ex-GOP CollinPowell is a new adherent to this view. He no more believes the whole thing invasion was necessary. He's been led to tell lies to the whole world representatives in the meeting at the United Nations general Assembly when the Iraqi case was decided. Despite all what the idddioottt arse008 says, the United Nations resolutions were extracted under arm twisting and bullying by the blood-thirsty Bush Admin and his previous thief-Wolfowitz.

[lars008-2009]

the war is legal

the resumption of hostilities was only a matter of time since iraq broke the ceasefire agreement.....

blame saddam for iraq%u2026%u2026. Even clintoon and the dems wanted the resumption of hostilities back in 1998

US Vice-President Al Gore has told Iraqi opposition politicians that the United States remains committed to the overthrow of President Saddam Hussein. BBC 6/2000
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1854092/posts

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html