Comments on: U.S. Warns Of "Evolving" Terror Threat

Al Qaeda Will Use Iraq Contacts To Mount Attack On U.S. Soil, Intelligence Estimate Claims

[torocaca]

The rejection of a personal creator God is also seen in Jainism and Buddhism in India. Posted by singinrick at 06:25 PM : Jul 18, 2007

True. But the golden rule, morality and ethics are the primary domain of both of these religions, something that most Christians, even very devout Christians, choose to ignore. Having a devout faith in Jesus as the saviour does not by itself make a person a decent human being.

[torocaca]

Welcome to the singinrick blog... Posted by fake-id at 07:14 PM : Jul 18, 2007

Actually it's more like "singinrick spewing hatred and prejudice from the bully pulpit..." ("bully" in the true sense of the word.)

Apparently singinrick is not aware, or perhaps he chooses to ignore, Christ's Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes that Christ spoke of, and Jesus' version of the golden rule (all major religions and cultures had their version, as did Confucius).

The third Beatitude: Blessed are the meek... Well, that leaves singinrick out; he's definitely not meek.

The seventh Beatitude: Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. singinrick is not a peacemaker. He advocates eradicating "radical Muslims." As far as singinrick is concerned, all Muslims are radical.

[fake-id-2009]

Welcome to the singinrick blog...

[randalds]

Sorry I don't give you the feel good message of the Bible. I prefer the whole truth, not just some of it.

God Bless you.

Posted by singinrick at 05:43 PM : Jul 18, 2007

You're more then welcome ricky, but to tell the truth (something you have no concept of) it's incredibly easy to rightfully insult you and your phony message. It's already so full of holes though that it is a bit of a challenge to find a place to poke more. You know ricky it's your fanatical (and ultimately ignorant) all or nothing attitude that destroys your arguments and your ability to convert anyone. You are unable to accept that there are indeed conflicts in the bible between the old and new testaments and within each. You are unable to accept that the stories (both of them) of creation are fairy tales and fables concocted to try to explain in an easy to understand from the beginning of the world for illiterates and was never meant to be taken literally. You are unable to accept that the bible does not have to be completely 100% accepted as literal truth or completely rejected as a complete lie and that it as never meant to be either. Thinking intelligent people look at the ridiculous fairy tales you selectively pick out of the bible and realize that if there was a god, he/she/it wouldn't be that illogical, that childish, that ignorant and expect humans to accept it.

[randalds]

I wonder who your religion of "atheism" has comforted.

Let's not even get into the comparisons....because I can promise you that you will lose out severely if we do.

But you don't have to lose out if you accept Christ.
Posted by singinrick at 05:46 PM : Jul 18, 2007

Tip tap tip tap tip tap. The sound of ricky dancing around the questions as usual. First of, in spite of your attempts to change the subject, atheism is not a religion. I doubt that even you are so ignorant that you're not able to grasp the concept that atheism is a lack of religion, so I can only conclude that you constantly go back to that line for reason of obfuscation and no other. It's not a different religion or even a refutation of religion itself. You can not answer the questions I raised about the conflicts between what you believe about G*ays still being condemned, but that other sins are now not as bad because Christ died for them, so now you can ignore PARTS of Leviticus because they're not too bad of sins and the punishments are very light. So instead you ignore the question and tap dance over to you're old standby of lying about what atheism is as an attempt to cover your failures and to ignore the obvious conflicts in you and your book of fairy tales. I understand that the real truth scares the pis*s out of you, but ducking it does not help your or your religions credibility.

[randalds]

I'm only out to tell you that Christ loves you.

You on the other hand are looking for self accolades and recognition.

Suit yourself Randy, and insult away....

Good day, and God Bless.
Posted by singinrick at 03:22 PM : Jul 18, 2007

No you're not ricky. Your message has nothing to do with love and it never has. Apparently you don't even read what you write, because your messages are always filled with hate toward other religions and people whose life's you constantly condemn. Sure you throw in a few words about love to try to cover your bigotry and I'm not even sure you realize that you're doing it. You read the words of the bible and understand their literal meanings, but you have no concept of the spirit that real Christians feel when they read it. You're a biblical lawyer and judge who wants to enforce the letter of the law while ignoring the spirit of it. You're a very very very poor representative of your faith ricky. A very very very poor one. With people like you trying to spread the word I can promise you that christianity will continue to fail to gain many new members. religion is supposed to comfort people, not frighten or condemn them, but those are the two things you wave like a weapon, constantly pushing people away from Christ while claiming to try to convert. You're a porcupine of a symbol of your church. Prickly and only capable of inflicting pain.

[randalds]

Atheists don't believe in the Bible at all and they definitely don't believe in the historical truths of the OT as you have freely admitted.

Posted by singinrick at 03:22 PM : Jul 18, 2007

This is what's known as a lie and you know it, so the hypocrisy is still flowing from your side ricky. It's also a lie (and you know it) that I could care less about what people here think of me or I wouldn't have taken a pro-immigration position. But you see ricky I always state what I believe in my heart, not what a book tells me that I should believe.

That clicking sounds is the echo of you tap dancing away, having once again ignored and refused to answer simple questions put to you, because the answers terrify the sh*it out of you. That's sad ricky. Sad and pathetic. Not surprising though from one who has closed his mind to the truth that exists outside of a dusty old book of fables. there is a whole world of knowledge and truth in outside of your book of fairy tales, but you can't look at it or even acknowledge that it exists, because to do so would topple the flimsy house of cards of religion you've built around your life.

[randalds]

-For one Randy you don't believe in God (or so you say, even though you admitted to some of the historical truths of the Old Testament) so I find it quite amusing that you are trying to use the Bible as a method of defense when you have boldly claimed that you are "certain" there is no God.

Posted by singinrick at 08:21 AM : Jul 18, 2007

Also and again dumbas*s, as I pointed out, acknowledging that places mentioned in the bible actually exist in history infinitely different then "admitting the truths" of the old testament. Again ricky, that's you tap dancing around the issue. I acknowledge that the city of London exited in the year 1984, but that's certainly not the same thing as acknowledging that Orwell's version of London in 1984 was real. Again ricky, you twist the words in a lame attempt to score debate points, without any effort to try to make one believe. If you're a prime example of those who are trying to bring people to Christ, then atheistism is certainly the wave of the future, because your debating the letter of the bible and ignoring the spirit of it drives people away and draws none nearer, because who wants to believe a biblical lawyer spouting arguments at a trial over a man of god trying to show people the way? You and your type (Falwell, Robertson, Swaggart, etc) are very poor representatives of Christianity and the reason fewer people believe in it.

[randalds]

The punishments in the Old Testament times were much more severe for sin. This is why Jesus paid the ultimate punishment on the cross.

Jesus did not come to abolish the laws, but to fulfill them. He paid the punishment on the cross. That's why the Old Testament "PUNISHMENTS" are no longer in effect, because of Jesus Christ.

This however does not mean that the LAWS are no longer in effect, which would include homosexuality STILL being a sin, as are other sexual sins. The sins of the OT and things that are against God are going to be here until Christ returns, for which He will then finally end the sin in this world at the final judgment.

Posted by singinrick at 08:21 AM : Jul 18, 2007

So then the laws of Leviticus are still in effect, but they're not as big of a sin because the punishments are less now. Good, so then every morning when you shave or when you go to the barber for a haircut or scr*ew one of your slaves without paying her first, you still knowingly and on purpose sin against the law, knowing that the sin is not as great so you don't have to worry about as much punishment. Yet you expect homosexuals to have to pay the ultimate price (in your bigoted mind) for have ga*y ***. Excuse me dumbas*s, but that hypocrisy of the highest order.

[randalds]

-For one Randy you don't believe in God (or so you say, even though you admitted to some of the historical truths of the Old Testament) so I find it quite amusing that you are trying to use the Bible as a method of defense when you have boldly claimed that you are "certain" there is no God.

Posted by singinrick at 08:21 AM : Jul 18, 2007

Keep finding it amusing ricky, but that's still tap dancing because I'm not defending anything, you are. Also if you believed in Grimms Fairy Tales (which wouldn't surprise me) then you wouldn't find it amusing that I sink down to your level and use those fairy tales to prove you're an idiot for believing in them.