Comments on: Intel: Al Qaeda Ups Efforts To Strike U.S.

New Intelligence Reveals Terror Group Gaining Capabilities To Attack

[nottellin1]

The terror group has been able to restore three of the four key tools it would need to launch an attack on U.S. soil: a safe haven in Pakistan's tribal areas, operational lieutenants and senior leaders. It could not immediately be learned what the missing fourth element is.

That is the most ridiculus quote I have seen this week. If they don't know what the forth element is, how can they know there are four and not six. Give me an F'in break!! I can't beleive the how stupiod the media considers the public to be.

[navyretired2]

"Posted by radiob at 08:40 AM : Jul 13, 2007"

Radiob, that link for the Israel/Iran pdf file came up not found. Do you have another link for that?

[lochlan-2009]

I appreciate your letting us know the "terrorists" are going to be raising energy prices. Thanks.

[prinzowhales]

For years the thoroughly MI-5 infiltrated Provisional Wing of the IRA has launched sophisticated bombs in Ireland and the UK. Now, we are faced with an international terrorist front that can only manage flour and H2O2 bombs and are asked to blindly ignore the incapacity of an organization that stood accused only a few scant years previous, of standing down NORAD, hijacking four planes, and bringing down the WTC towers and ramming the Pentagon. (While a minimum of seven of the accused are alive and well according to BBC reports and the apology to one of them by the US State Department)

If there is a terror strike in this country, it will be sponsored by, or overseen, by the Neo-Cons as were 9-11 and the '93 WTC attacks. Tell us Chertoff, will it be an American Beslan...will it be very taxing for the al Qaeda masterminds to cross the border that is little more than a sieve that drugs and illegals pass with little trouble?

[pepperp1]

Yes many people in the ME hate our guts, really hate our guts and some are viscous killers and we should always be aware on alert given the chance well%u2026. But this latest veiled incompetent propaganda attack by Bush and his bots to distract from his again failed performance as Commander in Chief was beyond bottom feeding. As an obvious companion piece to the Al Qaeda will steal your children speech Bush was delivering in Cleveland, Chertoff' a probable stand in for the radio active Cheney, was supposed to quote some source in the media for his profound Boo fear of a no specific soon to happen attack not his gut, where oh where is is Judi Miller when you need her, and then quietly leak the obvious IE, then Bush could wail against not talking about national security because it is classified but indicate ya know something to be very afraid without details looking all presidential, it unfortunately has worked with many people now the clumsy buffoonery is just pathetic. We should be afraid very afraid with these leaders at the helm.

[panhandlpete]

Just listened to Fox audio report about Amdocs, owned by Israel, and how they have contracts with at least 25 of the top telecommunications system. The most chilling statement was that they may have had knowledge of the 9/ll attack from their surveillance.

My question would be......why did they not pre warn us, and if they did, who did they tell? By being silent, they would be just as guilty as the perpretrators.......now this warrants further investigation.

This is a prime example of outside investments being used against our national security interests. It's time Congress reviewed the laws governing trade.

[radiob-2009]

Prinzowhales - do you honestly beleive that Iran is not a threat not only to us but the entire middle east.
Posted by guyfrompa45


Read the Chatham House report in regards to Iran.
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/pdf/research/mep/BPisraeliran.pdf

It is in PDF format and takes about a 1/2 hour to read. It was paid for by the British government.
The question in the war on terror is how do we fight the war? Do we use a conventional military or unconventional means? What measures do we use to prevent "radicalism" from growing" ?

[navyretired2]

"A progressive and positive way of thinking would be that not all muslims, like people of other faiths, do not practice their dogma with 100% devoutness, and actually want a life different from their past......our only hope!


Posted by panhandlpete at 08:23 AM : Jul 13, 2007"

Then it must be deemed a cult and not a religion. Society refuses to recognize the facts that they are bound to eternal slaughter in the name of "religion."

[prinzowhales]

Senator Rockefellar of the Senate Intelligence Committee passed on the obvious crock from the Neo-con apparatus in the intelligence agencies with their obviously manufactured and/or low value intelligence on Iraq's WMDs. The utter lack of evidence is illustrated by the 'leads' given to the UN inspection teams...every single one of them was wrong! One of the team leaders termed them "worse than useless." Yet Rockefellar, Edwards and the other rubberstampers on the committee passed on this nonsense as justification for invasion.

Now the Senate is buying into the lies regarding Iran and following that incarnation of Corporatism and Israel-first, Liebermann, in threatening Iran, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME AIDING MAOIST TERROR GROUPS--THAT OPENLY BOAST OF THEIR US ASSOCIATIONS AND MILITARY OVERSIGHT--THAT HAVE LAUNCHED TERROR ATTACKS IN IRAN.

The Senate is complicit once more in the opening of another front in the Stupid People's War.

[panhandlpete]

If the guidebook of muslim says kill (not convert) all non-muslims, then why in h**l are we bringing all those well-trained muslims back to the US just because they helped us in Iraq? More than 66,000 of them, enough to have their own little Iraq, but they most likely will get jobs working in D.C. Do you suppose some of them might just be the ones that Al Qaeda recruit?

A progressive and positive way of thinking would be that not all muslims, like people of other faiths, do not practice their dogma with 100% devoutness, and actually want a life different from their past......our only hope!

[navyretired2]

"NavyRetired2
Is the strategy correct to fight terrorist? Using conventional military in a unconventional war?"

I wouldn't think so no, although that wasn't the point I was making below. As I said in the post, I don't support how Bush has went about conducting operations over there, I simply agree with going after the terrorists. Does this mean I'll blindly follow and support Bush in the name of the "War on Terror?" Certainly not.

I don't have the answers for how we should've directly went against al Kookda, but obviously Bush doesn't either. Our troops fighting over in Iraq in a conventional manner is definitely NOT the answer. Afghanastan I agreed with, Iraq I did not.

[radiob-2009]

NavyRetired2
Is the strategy correct to fight terrorist? Using conventional military in a unconventional war?

[navyretired2]

"Posted by tuckerndfw at 01:25 AM : Jul 13, 2007"

I understand everything you said, and how does any of that provide the alternate to what I said?

You say the muslim religion has no central leadership and is not centrally organized. How does that change the fact that it's in their guiding book that they will destroy all non-muslims? You're dodging the point.

You say Bush declared war on al Kookda, which is why he's their #1 supporter. Had a Dem or some other Rep been president, would you have expected them to do nothing? Turn the other cheek a few times? The nation overwhelmingly wanted to persue justice on them for what they did, not just Bush.

I'm not arguing for how Bush has conducted anything, but he was the sitting president at the time this happened, and I think any president would have declared war on al Kookda, and the public STRONGLY agreed. I guess we're all responsible for helping the terrorists by not bending over and giving them their way right?

[radiob-2009]

ABC has a interview with Richard Clarke former terrorist czar on the recent spikes of terrorist threat.States that he thinks the US is in the same position as it was prior to 9-11.

[rharrin1]

Here is some very good Fox News video coverage of the 9/11/01 dancing Israelis (that's right, I said Fox):

Posted by FeelFree1 at 04:41 AM : Jul 13, 2007

Being from fox can you believe it is true?

[hypnotoad72]

Were those Indian chaps arrested in Australia Al Quaeda? Islamic? Hindu? Athiest? Klingon? Or Dalek?

And thanks to the radio show I listen to, they keep saying if we have satellites that can spot license plates from orbit, why can't we bomb these known terrorist camps and reduce the threat?

[neoconrcrazy]

bushit is again lying his heart out to America - saying, again, Al-Qaeda in Iraq did 911 - when everyone knows Al-Qaeda was not in iraq before The Bush War.

this joke of a president is beyond help -

why doesn't one reporter ask him THE QUESTION:

How does it feel, Mr. President, to be the biggest failure of the World ?

[mcvet]

Is THIS the SAME Al Qaeda that Bush said was distroyed? Is this the same Al Qaeda that Bush said wasn't relivant when he started HIS war in Iraq? Folks in the future when dictionary's define the word Incompetent there will be a picture of Bush right next to it so EVERYONE will understand the meaning of the word. He has lied so much that he can't keep it straight anymore... he has twisted and distorted things to the point that no one with any love of this country believes him. Can we make it until he leaves? I sure hope so, because there just isn't enough time and to many southern fascist in congress to remove him. Sieg Heil Bush!!

[mcvet]

Here are two typical stupid good leftist remarks - look above how intelligent we are. Now as I said above: to make all you leftist feel really good:
1). Watch all of Michael Moore's movies
2). Watch Al Gore's be nice to the Earth movie
3). Try to get the early exit poll results for the 2004 prez election. You all will feel good like nice leftist.
Posted by jb01201a at 02:34 AM : Jul 13, 2007

Now all you kids out there who want to know and experience FASCISM as it was practiced by the KLAN during the 60's and Joe McCarthy in the 50's here's a very good example. The poster raises specific points, points the responder obviously doesn't agree with. But as is the case with all fascist they do not, nor have they ever, had a solution so??? They attack the person who dares raise the issue of the "Party" not having the answers. Now McCarthy used the "Red Scare" to silence those who disagreed with them. The Klan and Bush's pals during the 60's? Well they used "Commie" or "*** Lover" to silence those who raised issues with their Terrorist Activity. Today the Limbaugh Crowd, they use "Liberal" or did until some started pointing out that this nation was founded by "Liberals" and that the GREATEST GENERATION was also the most LIBERAL GENERATION... they then switched to "leftist". In the end the goal is always the same. Attack the messenger so people will not notice that you have no answers or any ability to lead. Sieg Heil Bush!!

[neoconrcrazy]

(Don't you guys have Google in Israel??? Do some research, for dogs sake....idiot...)
Posted by veteran71

hey, vet - the guys doing israel's dirty-work are right here among us - in DC.

wofowitz, abrams, feith, perle, and other american zionists - most of them have israeli passports along with their "cover" american ones.

this zionist state of israel is costing us much much more than it's worth. size of new jersey and it's gobbling up 3 billion in "aid" a year - mostly being used to build a "greater israel" on stolen palestinian land - and another 5 billion a year for free american military hardware.

just because these zionist jokers won't give back what they've stolen - we get stuck with the bill ?????? are we crazy ?