Comments on: 100 Killed In 3 Days In Afghanistan

Afghan Officials Say Casualties Include Civilians, Police, Militants; 7 Kids Killed By U.S. Air Strike

Add a Comment See all 64 Comments
by toolmangler-2009 June 18, 2007 2:19 PM EDT
You forgot one, Al Qaeda=CIA proxy for Afghanistan against Russia.

Duh...
Posted by brianbwb at 11:10 AM : Jun 18, 2007

Another reason they hate us. We didn't help them after Russia left. That put us at the top of Bin Ladens list. (That plus the fact we weren't Muslim and likely not to be either).
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 June 18, 2007 2:10 PM EDT
to s1ckd09,

you ask "Are you seriously saying that we should bomb a country based on the country they came from?"

I answer, since they all died during their "deed" there was then no need to bomb anyone. How could the be in Afghanistan, when they died in NY and Wash DC?

You forgot one, Al Qaeda=CIA proxy for Afghanistan against Russia.

Duh...
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 June 18, 2007 2:05 PM EDT
to Toolmangler,

And not only did we put him in, but then denied the atrocities until the evidence was overwhelming
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 June 18, 2007 2:02 PM EDT
To install a puppet government that will let Bush and his former oil consultant, now president Karzai operate his oil pipeline without resistance?
Posted by brianbwb at 10:41 AM : Jun 18, 2007


Remember "Pol "Pot"?
Kill tally: One to three million (or between a quarter and a third of the country's population)
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat June 18, 2007 2:00 PM EDT
U.S. Air Strike Kills 7 Afghan Kids
Coalition Says Suspected Al Qaeda Militants Targeted In Strike

-With all the updated intelligence, Nato (US) still look like amateur. Just wondering who is more performing into botching operations: Nato or Talibans?
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 June 18, 2007 1:55 PM EDT
You say,"Not one of them wants to leave the job half done."

Now comes the big question, what "job"?

Posted by brianbwb at 10:41 AM : Jun 18, 2007

The only job they are trying to do now is stabilize the country enough to prevent a bloodbath (remember Vietnam, Cambodia)?
They would leave tomorrow if some 'one' was in control and had a workable plan for the country.
(Should'a left Saddam in charge)
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 June 18, 2007 1:41 PM EDT
to Toolmangler,

You say,"Not one of them wants to leave the job half done."

Now comes the big question, what "job"?

What is the goal, to kill everyone who doesn't like our being there killing them? To install a puppet government that will let Bush and his former oil consultant, now president Karzai operate his oil pipeline without resistance?

Just what is the goal of being there, when we supposedly went in to "take out" Bin Laden, who, it seems wasn't and now isn't even there?
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 June 18, 2007 1:35 PM EDT
to Toolmangler,

Many people's passports were registered that day, but only Saudis were "the hijackers"?

There were no Irish, or Brits, Americans, Iraqis, or even Afghanis on board?

Of all the Saudis who were accused, how many are definitely "hijackers", or do we assume that all Saudi passports definitely belonged to hijackers?
The only "evidence" we have is what Bush put out there, and we all know now Bush's word cannot be trusted.

Why did Bush pull the funding of the investigation just as the investigators were beginning to "follow the money"?

At one time your intuition led you to ask that question, was such an easy answer really enough to eliminate your doubts?
Reply to this comment
by s1ckd09 June 18, 2007 1:34 PM EDT
wow... you ignorance astounds me. I'll make this simple.
9-11 = Al-qaida operation.
Afghanistan = Al-qaida held country.

Therefore, attack the people responsible for 9-11 which were in Afghanistan. There is absolutely no question from anybody about that, is there?
Are you seriously saying that we should bomb a country based on the country they came from? And by the way, the passports didn't have to be found, to know who had them and where they were from. They kinda keep records of those things, which is the reason people are required to have them. duh.

The biggest lie being told over there is that these people are being called "insurgents" and not "terrorists".
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 June 18, 2007 1:25 PM EDT
since all the so-called hijackers had Saudi passports, (which also may have been a lie,
Posted by brianbwb at 10:16 AM : Jun 18, 2007


My cousin tells me that the passports were registered 'as' the hijackers got on the Planes.
I asked him the same question in 2001.
Reply to this comment
See all 64 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (713 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: