Comments on: Pakistan Denies Bin Laden's In Country

Rejects U.S. Claims That Al Qaeda Is Setting Up Camps Near Afghan Border

[pakaal]

For the third time I ask you to give me evidence to support that. Put up or shut up, kid.
"you cant make me shut up,punkbytch."

And it appears you can't come up with the evidence I asked four times for. Don't worry, since you can't find any, I won't ask you again. I know this must be humiliating for ya.

"you still have not named a time, place or battle where he has defeated us forces?"

Defeat is the opposite of victory, yes? Have we been defeated? No. Have we won? And if we have, why are we still there? You're equating some grand ground war with house to house searches and a war of attrition. Not the same thing, as a military expert such as yourself surely knows. No lost battles equals victory and improved peace? I don't think so.

"all you came up with is , a casualty count, that any 12 year old could look up."

then how come you couldn't do it until I posted the link, and had to ask me "when was the last time they shot a US soldier in combat?"

"they have never captured a single us soldier. sounds like we completely kicked the #%^$ out of them to me."

Yeah, so why are we still there, if as you imply, we've done such a spectacular job? And why is the guy behind the 9/11 attacks still free?

[pakaal]

usadvisor101 wrote: no where in my comment does it even come close to claiming that.

...usadvisor101 wrote earlier: "the media has over hyped ive been hidin"

And Bin Laden is... who again? You say the media overhypes Bin Laden. Bin Laden was behind 9/11. C'mon kid, stay focused, I know it's hard to connect those two little dots, but I think even you can do it.

[pakaal]

Thanks for the vague summary.

For the second time: You're a liar. Show me anywhere in my posts where I "stick up for" Bin Laden. You can't just throw that *** out and expect not to be called on it. So prove yourself.

You want to support the troops. Great. I support them too. We agree on that. We agree on it being a mistake to invade Iraq. As for the rest:

I ask for the fourth time: show me how you know Bin Laden is marginalized. Still waiting, there, usadvisor101. What's taking so long? Prove it.

As for battles: I repeat, increased attacks, increased casualties, a country that's barely holding the capital city after six years of occupation is not "winning". That's not our military's fault it's our leaders'.

Last but not least, I didn't say you mentioned 9/11 first did I? You didn't have to. You're talking about Osama Bin Laden. Hello? What's he famous for again? Can you tell me that? Is anyone home?

[pakaal]

"your spending your time sticking up for the coward ive been hidin. and i am commenting about how us forces slap the idiots around afghanistan anytime they try to fight us."

OK your turn. You're a liar. Show me anywhere in my posts where I "stick up for" Bin Laden.

And your comments imply - continually - that Bin Laden has been marginalized. For the third time I ask you to give me evidence to support that. Put up or shut up, kid.

[pakaal]

"none of your comments have said anything good about us forces."

what part of my comment (06:59 pm):

"our military - the finest in the world"

is too complicated for you usadvisor101? I can always dumb it down for you.

Yeah, sorry kid, resorting to insults instead of backing up your points means you really don't know what you're talking about at all. And your casual use of words like "liar" when you can't back that up either, means you don't really care to hear anything but the sound of your own voice. Grow up.

[pakaal]

"why dont you write down what i am saying read it then wipe your behind with it,clown."

Because I'm having more fun writing down what you are saying and ripping it up, and also because you say Bin Laden isn't "a real threat now" (your words), even though you haven't any evidence to back that up.

[pakaal]

usadvisor101 wrote: "show me where i said there were no us casualties last month."

...and usadvisor101 wrote earlier: "when was the last time they shot a us soldier in combat?"

duh.

[pakaal]

"are you sure it was us forces, not coalition forces?"

are you sure you know what a "link" is? I've given you the link you need to confirm US troop fatalities in Afghanistan for yourself (over 500 since 2001), take it or leave it.

are we doing well militarily? no. our military - the finest in the world - is overstretched and diverted thanks to our invasion of Iraq. Coalition troops in Afghanistan are seeing increasing attacks (214 in 2004, 267 in 2005, 401 in 2006 and already 26 in 2007). This reflects a growing threat, not "mission accomplished".

And in the end, this discussion was about how you feel about capturing Bin Laden as a primary goal. You don't think he's important, that's fine, but I'm still waiting for all that evidence you're sitting on that this guy's been marginalized.

[pakaal]

since you didn't even know that there were US troops killed last month, you ought not to tell others they don't know what they're talking about. I recommend you read before you comment:

http://www.icasualties.org/oef/Default.aspx

[pakaal]

"i see you cannot come up with any examples. other than the one car bomb. obviously you have no clue about afghanistan or the us military."

Considering the fact that Kabul is the only place in Afghanistan that's secure, i'd say you're the one having trouble seeing the picture over there. We left Bin Laden uncaught, and left Afghanistan behind to start a war in Iraq. Conditions in Afghanistan are worsening. Bin Laden's still free.