Comments on: Obamanomics Renders Economy Inefficient
Weekly Standard: The President's Policies on Energy, Unions, and Health Care Won't Help an Ailing Economy
- I agree. It seems like the right wing touts free markets and when they run amok they say "we we did not tell them to do that". Maybe not, but when you set the stage for no other outcome then you are culpable just as much as the people that did it.
- Reply to this comment
- Perhaps it is time for people to demand and protest our fraud in chief like those who did the mullas in Iran. People are now convinced that Bo is a complete and utter failure on everything from Iran to North Korea and Honduras to swine flu to the goverment takeover of GM and fianlly last but not least our continued failed economy. Where are the jobs that were promised answer their are none as we now learn and unemployemt is now rising along with gas prices. One thing seems evidant now this guy who knows nothing about how goverment and business work was put into place to reward the gangsters of Wall Street and Goldman Sachs the rest is history.
- Reply to this comment
-
- It was the disaster that was Reagan and his failed deregulation and pro-corporation government takeover that started the problem. Then there was the war criminal Bushoccio who put corporate crime on steroids, gave huge welfare payments to the failed banks and started illegal and costly invasions for oil.
- Bush in 2004 tried to fix the banking regulation, Barney Frank was the most vocal in saying banks did not need regulation, it never made to the floor, every DEMOCRAT voted against the idea. Obama is for "trickle-up poverty"
- Reply to this comment
- These right wingnuts are socialists through and through. They want to take our taxpayers money and give it to Wall Street and Exxon and Wal Mart. Damn corporate socialist pigs.
- Reply to this comment
- I think he means the clueless, frightened little right wingnuts. With their war criminal Bushoccio Crime Family joke. And their heroes the failed Reagan fiscal policies and corporate masters.
- Reply to this comment
- It seemed to help get us out of the last Republican Depression. With unemployment over 20% (yes, it is at least twice what the corporate run government reports), we need to spend to create jobs for the poor and middle classes.
- Reply to this comment
- by rhs648 July 1, 2009 7:18 AM PDT
You don't agree with the article so it is more "wrong wing nut" propaganda. Does that mean everyone who disagrees with you is wrong. Does that mean everyone who disagrees with you is a "wrong wing nut"? We certainly want you at the helm. That way we will have another idiot telling us a better way to do things.
You should know! You've been calling everyone who won't agree with you a "Liberal" for years!! The point is there IS no option other than the Presidents Plan. What little there is left of the Confederate Party is still pushing Trickle Down. Now there we do NOT need to guess... we already KNOW that turkey won't work... NEVER has and NEVER will. - Reply to this comment
- The President's Policies on Energy, Unions, and Health Care Won't Help an Ailing Economy
Of course it won't.....since when did going on a shopping spree and spend massively, help someone who was broke ? never - Reply to this comment
-
- It seemed to help get us out of the last Republican Depression. With unemployment over 20% (yes, it is at least twice what the corporate run government reports), we need to spend to create jobs for the poor and middle classes.
- by iam4honesty July 1, 2009 11:00 AM PDT
Oh, look... it's singing! That should keep it occupied for a while.
____________________
That isn't singing Lib....it's the stupid idiot suzyku who discovered a new bad word and needs to repeat it, over and over...wingnut ! - Reply to this comment
-
- I think he means the clueless, frightened little right wingnuts. With their war criminal Bushoccio Crime Family joke. And their heroes the failed Reagan fiscal policies and corporate masters.
- Oh, look... it's singing! That should keep it occupied for a while.
- Reply to this comment




